The British Journal of Psychiatry (2000) 176: 523-526
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Obstetric complications and affective psychoses
Two case-control studies based on structured obstetric records
M. BAIN, MFPHM,
E. JUSZCZAK, MSc and
K. McINNENY, BA
Information and Statistics Division, National Health Service in Scotland,
Edinburgh
R. E. KENDELL, FRSE
Edinburgh University Department of Psychiatry, Royal Edinburgh Hospital,
Edinburgh
Correspondence: Dr R. E. Kendell, 3 West Castle Road, Edinburgh EH10 5AT
Declaration of interest Funding from the Scottish Office Department
of Health.
See pp. 516-522 and pp.
527-530, this issue. 

ABSTRACT
Background Unlike schizophrenia, little interest has been taken
in
the incidence of obstetric complications in affective psychoses.
Aims To find out whether obstetric complications are more common in
affective psychoses than matched controls.
Method Two hundred and seventeen probands with an in-patient
diagnosis of affective psychosis who had been born in Scotland in 1971-74, and
a further 84 born in 1975-78, were closely matched with controls and the
incidence of obstetric complications in the two compared using obstetric data
recorded in a set format shortly after birth.
Results Abnormal presentation of the foetus was the only
complication significantly more common in the affective probands in the
1971-74 birth cohort and artificial rupture of the membranes was the only
event more common in the probands in the 1975-78 cohort. Both are probably
chance findings.
Conclusion It is unlikely that the incidence of obstetric
complications is raised in people with affective psychoses of early onset.

INTRODUCTION
Over 30 case-control comparisons of the incidence of obstetric
complications in people with schizophrenia and normal controls
have been
published in the past 20 years, and these have convinced
many investigators
not only that the incidence of obstetric
complications is raised in
schizophrenia, but also that they
contribute to the aetiology of the syndrome.
So far as we are
aware, however, there has been no comparison of a substantial
population of affective psychoses with normal controls based
on obstetric
information recorded at the time of birth. Lewis
& Murray
(
1987) studied large groups of
patients with
bipolar disorders and unipolar depression, but their obstetric
information was derived from the routine case notes of adult
psychiatric
patients. Verdoux & Bourgeois
(
1993) studied
23 patients with
bipolar disorder and 23 normal controls, but
their obstetric information was
obtained retrospectively (by
a non-blind interviewer) from the subjects'
mothers. Rifkin
et al
(
1994) compared 100 patients
with schizophrenia and
67 with affective psychoses, but their information was
also
obtained retrospectively from the mothers and they had no normal
controls. Done
et al
(
1991) and Buka
et al
(
1993) both studied
large birth
cohorts for whom extensive obstetric information
had been recorded at the time
and both identified which members
of these birth cohorts had developed
affective as well as schizophrenic
illnesses in early adult life. However,
their numbers of subjects
with psychoses were small and neither obtained
convincing evidence
that the incidence of obstetric complications was raised
in
either schizophrenia or affective disorders, although Done
et al
(
1991) did find a significantly
reduced duration of pregnancy
in their 32 subjects with affective psychoses.
Our study was
planned against this background. We also assumed that it was
established that the incidence of obstetric complications was
raised in
schizophrenia, and likely that some of these complications
contributed to the
aetiology of schizophrenia. We wanted, therefore,
to find out whether the
aetiological role of intrauterine or
perinatal trauma was specific to
schizophrenia or whether it
contributed to the genesis of affective psychoses
as well.

METHOD
Basic design
The study was carried out alongside the study of obstetric complications
and schizophrenia described by Kendell
et al
(
2000, this issue)
and the
overall design of the two studies was almost identical.
Briefly, it consisted
of a case-control comparison based on
subjects born in Scotland between 1
January 1971 and 31 December
1978. The obstetric data were derived from a
cumulative register
of all hospital births in Scotland (Scottish Morbidity
Record
2, SMR2) containing fairly detailed demographic and obstetric
information in a set numerical format, and members of the birth
cohort who
developed affective psychoses in adolescence or
early adult life were
identified from a register (Scottish
Morbidity Record 4, SMR4) of all
admissions to psychiatric
hospitals or units in Scotland. Subjects with
affective psychoses
were individually matched with controls from the same
birth
cohort who had never been admitted to a psychiatric hospital
with a
discharge diagnosis of either schizophrenia or an affective
psychosis on six
different variables the obstetric
unit of birth, gender, date of birth
(±2 months), maternal
age (±2 years), maternal parity (first
baby
v. second
or subsequent baby) and father's occupation (manual
v. non-manual).
Salient items in the SMR2 (obstetric) records of the
probands
and their controls were then compared. Further information is
given
in the previous paper describing the schizophrenia study
(
Kendell et al, 2000,
this issue). As in Kendell
et al's study,
the 1971-74 and 1975-78
birth cohorts were analysed separately,
mainly because the content and layout
of the form used to record
obstetric (SMR2) information was changed on 1
January 1975.
Diagnostic criteria
For most of the relevant time period the National Health Service (NHS) in
Scotland recorded all hospital diagnoses by their ICD-9 code numbers
(World Health Organization,
1978). For the purpose of this study it was therefore
straightforward to define affective psychosis as ICD-9 code
numbers 296.0-296.9. It is important to note, though, that category 296 in
ICD-9 corresponded to the Kraepelinian concept of manic-depressive psychosis,
which embraced severe depressive illnesses whether or not they were
accompanied by hallucinations or delusions as well as manic and bipolar
illnesses. However, ICD-9 was replaced by ICD-10
(World Health Organization,
1992) on 1 April 1996 and this classification does not contain
either a category of affective psychosis or a category corresponding to
Kraepelin's manic-depressive psychosis. Nor is there any official translation
from ICD-9 to ICD-10. For this reason affective psychosis had to be defined
after 1 April 1996 by an arbitrary grouping of ICD-10 codes (F30, F31, F32.2
and 32.3 and F33.2 and 33.3) chosen to correspond as closely as possible to
the previous 296 code. Discharge rather than admission diagnoses were used
throughout and in subjects with more than one psychiatric admission the most
recent discharge diagnosis was used.
Matching with controls
SMR2 (obstetric) records were found for 343 (51%) of the 668 subjects with
affective psychoses born in 1971-78 originally identified from the SMR4
(psychiatric) file. The main reasons for failure to identify a matching SMR2
record were birth outside Scotland and domiciliary delivery. Vital demographic
information (mainly the father's occupation) was missing from 26 obstetric
records, which reduced the total available for matching from 343 to 317. It
proved possible to match all but 16 of these on all of the six variables
described above. We therefore obtained 301 matched pairs 217 born in
1971-74 and 84 born in 1975-78. There are far fewer in the 1975-78 cohort
because its members are, on average, 4 years younger and only just entering
the risk period for the development of an affective psychosis.
At the time the SMR4 (psychiatric) data were extracted from the master file
(October 1997) the age of the 1971-74 affective probands ranged from 22-26
years. Fifty per cent were male and 102 (47%) had manic or bipolar illnesses.
The age of the 1975-78 probands ranged from 18-22 years. Fifty per cent were
male and 45 (54%) had manic or bipolar illnesses. Probands and controls were
compared using the same standard case-control analysis of matched case-control
sets as the parallel study of obstetric complications and schizophrenia
(Kendell et al, 2000,
this issue).

RESULTS
1971-74 births
The results of the proband-control comparisons are shown in
Table 1. The incidence of
complications of both pregnancy and
delivery is very similar in the affective
probands and their
controls. Indeed, there is only a significant difference
between
them for two of the 24 items studied. Abnormal presentation
of the
foetus is more common in the probands (17
v. 7;
P=0.04)
and
a maternal haemoglobin level below 10 g is more common
in the controls (16
v. 7;
P=0.05). The mean maternal haemoglobin
level is also
0.26 g lower in the controls (
P=0.03). As in
the schizophrenia study,
all the complications recorded on
the SMR2 form by their ICD-8
(
World Health Organization,
1967)
code numbers were compared individually, but there was only
one significant difference. Delivery complicated by malpresentation
of the
foetus was more common in the affectives (9
v. 1;
P<0.02),
but this is really the same item as before.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1 1971-74 births. Complications of pregnancy, delivery and the
puerperium. Comparison of probands with affective psychoses and their controls
(217 matched pairs)
|
1975-78 births
The results of the proband-control comparisons are shown in
Table 2. Again, the incidence
of complications of both pregnancy and delivery is very similar in the
affective probands and their controls there is a significant
difference between the two for only one of the (slightly different) set of 24
items studied. Artificial rupture of the membranes is more common in the
probands (39 v. 27; P=0.03). It is important to note,
though, that in the 1971-74 cohort artificial rupture of the membranes was
more common in the controls (98 v. 80; P=0.06), suggesting
that this is a chance finding. Similarly, abnormal presentation of the foetus
is marginally more common in the control group (8 v. 7) suggesting
that the higher frequency in the probands in the 1971-74 birth cohort may also
have been a chance finding.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 2 1975-78 births. Complications of pregnancy, delivery and the
puerperium. Comparison of probands with affective psychoses and their controls
(84 matched pairs)
|
As before, all the complications recorded on the SMR2 forms by their ICD-8
code numbers were compared individually, but no significant differences
emerged.

DISCUSSION
The most plausible explanation of these findings is that the
incidence of
obstetric complications is not raised in affective
psychoses and that they are
not a risk factor for the development
of an affective psychosis. In both the
1971-74 and 1975-78
birth cohorts the incidence of complications of both
pregnancy
and delivery was very similar in the affective probands and
their
controls. The one complication that was significantly
more common in the
affective group in the 1971-74 cohort
abnormal presentation of the
foetus was marginally
more common in the controls in the 1975-78
cohort and the only
complication that was more common in the affective group
in
the 1975-78 cohort artificial rupture of the membranes
was
considerably more common in the controls in the
larger 1971-74 cohort. Both
complications are also different
from those (emergency Caesarean section and a
labour lasting
over 12 hours) which were significantly more common in our
probands with schizophrenia than in their controls
(
Kendell et al, 2000,
this issue) and the reduced duration of pregnancy
previously reported in their
affective patients by Done
et al
(
1991).
This conclusion is subject to two qualifications. First, none of the
subjects even in the 1971-74 birth cohort was over the age of 26 years, so
none had passed through the main risk period for the development of an
affective psychosis. It is possible, therefore, that the incidence of
obstetric complications is raised in the mainly unipolar or depressive
psychoses presenting later in life. Second, the obstetric (SMR2) and
psychiatric (SMR4) data on which this study was based were recorded, albeit in
a set numerical format, in the course of ordinary clinical practice and little
is known about their reliability (see
Kendell et al, 2000,
this issue). If their reliability was very low genuine proband-control
differences could have failed to emerge. With a total sample size of over 300
matched pairs, however, it is unlikely that major differences could have been
completely obscured, particularly as there was not even a trend for
complications to be commoner in the affectives than in their closely matched
controls.

APPENDIX
After this study was completed a very similar Swedish investigation
was
published by Hultman
et al
(
1999). As here, this
case-control
study was based on a national birth cohort from the 1970s and
obstetric information recorded shortly after birth. Affective
psychosis was
defined in the same way (ICD-9 category 296);
the number of affective probands
was smaller but still substantial
(
n=198). Apart from a relationship
with birth in January to
April (the season of birth effect) the
only obstetric
variable that was significantly commoner in the affective
psychoses
than their controls was uterine atony (odds ratio 2.2, 95% Cl
1.2-4.1), and when males and females were examined separately
the difference
was only significant in the former. This study
therefore strengthens our
conclusion that obstetric complications
are unlikely to be a risk factor for
the development of an
early onset affective psychosis.

Clinical Implications and Limitations
CLINICAL IMPLICATION
- It is unlikely that obstetric complications contribute to the aetiology
of early onset affective psychoses.
LIMITATIONS
- Little information is available about the reliability of the routinely
recorded obstetric data on which the study was based.
- People with affective psychoses were identified by clinical diagnoses at
the time of discharge from in-patient care.
- Subjects were all under the age of 27 years, and so had not passed
through the main risk period for affective psychosis.

REFERENCES
- Buka, S. L., Tsuang, M. T. & Lipsitt, L. P.
(1993) Pregnancy/delivery complications and psychiatric
diagnosis: a prospective study. Archives of General
Psychiatry, 50,
151-157.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Done, D. J., Johnstone, E. C., Frith, C. D., et al
(1991) Complications of pregnancy and delivery in relation to
psychosis in adult life: data from the British perinatal mortality survey
sample. British Medical Journal,
302,
1576-1580.
- Hultman, C. M., Sparén, P.,
Takei, N., et al (1999) Prenatal and perinatal risk
factors for schizophrenia, affective psychosis, and reactive psychosis of
early onset: case-control study. British Medical
Journal, 318,
421-426.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kendell, R. E., McInneny, K., Juszczak, E., et al
(2000) Obstetric complications and schizophrenia. Two
case-control studies based on structured obstetric records. British
Journal of Psychiatry, 176,
516-522.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lewis, S. W. & Murray, R. M. (1987)
Obstetric complications, neurodevelopmental deviance, and risk of
schizophrenia. Journal of Psychiatric Research,
21,
413-421.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Rifkin, L., Lewis, S., Jones, P., et al
(1994) Low birth weight and schizophrenia. British
Journal of Psychiatry, 165,
357-362.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Verdoux, H. & Bourgeois, M. (1993) A
comparative study of obstetric history in schizophrenics, bipolar patients and
normal subjects. Schizophrenia Research,
9, 67-69.[CrossRef][Medline]
- World Health Organization (1967)
Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases,
Injuries and Causes of Death (ICD-8). Geneva: WHO.
- World Health Organization (1978)
Mental Disorders: Glossary and Guide to their Classification in
Accordance with the Ninth Revision of the International Classification of
Diseases. Geneva: WHO.
- World Health Organization (1992) The
ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical
Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva: WHO.
Received for publication January 12, 1999.
Revision received October 25, 1999.
Accepted for publication October 26, 1999.
Related articles in BJP:
- Obstetric complications and schizophrenia: Two case-control studies based on structured obstetric records
- R. E. KENDELL, K. McINNENY, E. JUSZCZAK, and M. BAIN
BJP 2000 176: 516-522.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
- Invited commentaries on: Obstetric complications and schizophrenia/affective psychoses
- T.J. Crow
BJP 2000 176: 527-529.
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Goodwin and Consensus Group of the British Association for Psy
Evidence-based guidelines for treating bipolar disorder: revised second edition--recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology
J Psychopharmacol,
June 1, 2009;
23(4):
346 - 388.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Gentile
Antipsychotic Therapy During Early and Late Pregnancy. A Systematic Review
Schizophr Bull,
September 11, 2008;
(2008)
sbn107v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Scott, Y. McNeill, J. Cavanagh, M. Cannon, and R. Murray
Exposure to obstetric complications and subsequent development of bipolar disorder: Systematic review
The British Journal of Psychiatry,
July 1, 2006;
189(1):
3 - 11.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. D. Kelly, L. Feeney, E. O'Callaghan, R. Browne, M. Byrne, N. Mulryan, A. Scully, M. Morris, A. Kinsella, N. Takei, et al.
Obstetric Adversity and Age at First Presentation With Schizophrenia: Evidence of a Dose-Response Relationship
Am J Psychiatry,
May 1, 2004;
161(5):
920 - 922.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. M. Goodwin
Evidence-Based Guidelines for Treating Bipolar Disorder: Recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology
J Psychopharmacol,
June 1, 2003;
17(2):
149 - 173.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T.J. Crow
Invited commentaries on: Signs of asphyxia at birth and risk of schizophrenia/Obstetric complications and risk of schizophrenia
The British Journal of Psychiatry,
November 1, 2001;
179(5):
415 - 416.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|