© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Correspondence |
Fear reduction by psychotherapies: a response
Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF
Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
Dr Snaith (2000) misquotes us (Marks & Dar, 2000) on an important point. We do not conclude that "all elements... have therapeutic potential and that any assertion of superiority of one approach over another is unwarranted". We specifically state that non-applied relaxation, avoidance (anti-exposure instructions), diary keeping, treatment set, giving a rationale, and regular homework assignments are not particularly therapeutic per se. Several approaches are less helpful than others.
We are grateful to Dr Snaith for reminding us of his results with anxiety control training (ACT). His paper (Snaith, 1974) noted that several ACT patients did imaginal or live exposure, which is covered by our discussion on exposure. He described his 1982 trial (Constantopoulos et al, 1982) of ACT briefly in a non-peer-reviewed chapter. Just 12 patients were randomised to either experience anxiety scenes or just cope with anxiety without exposure. His papers (Constantopoulos et al, 1982; Snaith, 1998) give too little detail to judge how much each treatment used imaginal exposure (implosion) or irrelevant fear exposure (stress immunisation). The reports give no mean ratings and standard deviations before and after treatment, preventing judgement of how much each group improved. Though both groups improved with no significant differences between them, the study lacked power - a very big difference would be needed to yield significance when comparing two cells containing just six patients each. Dr Snaith's results with "just coping with anxiety" may echo those with irrelevant fear exposure and support our idea that stress immunisation (irrelevant fear exposure) may reduce anxiety. Snaith et al's (1992) paper did not describe randomisation to ACT or a contrasting procedure.
Our call for psychotherapists to work towards a common psychotherapy language that defines each procedure in a standard accepted terminology is bolstered by examining Dr Snaith's terms. What he calls "meditation" has relatively little in common with Kabat-Zinn's (1996) mindfulness meditation, and his ACT, for example, includes components which are not specified regarding relevant v. irrelevant exposure. If psychotherapists agreed to call the same procedures by the same names, that would be a huge step forward. European and American associations in the field (the European Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Therapy (EABCT) and the Association for Advancement of Behavioural Therapy (AABT)) have appointed a joint task force to develop a common psychotherapy language.
REFERENCES
- Constantopoulos, A., Snaith, R. P. & Jardine, Y. (1982) Self-control psychotherapy with and without exposure to anxiety. In Learning Theory Approaches To Psychiatry, pp. 111-115. New York & Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
- Kabat-Zinn, J. (1996) Full Catastrophe Living. How to Cope with Stress, Pain and Illness Using Mindfulness Meditation. London: Piatkus.
- Marks, I. & Dar, R. (2000) Fear reduction
by psychotherapies. Recent findings, future directions. British
Journal of Psychiatry, 176,
507-511.
[Free Full Text] - Snaith, R. P. (1974) A method of psychotherapy
based on relaxation techniques. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 124,
473-481.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Snaith, R. P. (1998) Meditation and
psychotherapy. British Journal of Psychiatry,
173,
193-195.
[Free Full Text] - Snaith, R. P. (2000) Invited commentary on:
Fear reduction by psychotherapies. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 176,
512-513.
[Free Full Text] - Snaith, R. P., Owens, D. & Kennedy, E. (1992) An outcome study of a brief anxiety management programme: Anxiety Control Training. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 9, 111-114.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||