|
|
|||||||||||
Correspondence |
Old Age Psychiatry, Fleetwood Hospital, Pharos Street, Fleetwood FY7 6BE
Kay et al's paper (2000) on long-term survival in pre-senile dementia adds a useful and important contribution to this under-researched area. While acknowledging the difficulties faced in drawing valid conclusions from a non-neuropathologically confirmed study, there are several points of interest and concern not raised by the authors.
Pre-senile dementia is a heterogeneous group of disorders and the report that only 19 of 233 cases were not pre-senile dementia of Alzheimer type or pre-senile vascular dementia is a concern. The authors previously recognised that cases defined as Alzheimer's disease by clinical criteria alone may include conditions with non-Alzheimer type pathology, such as Pick's disease (Newens et al, 1993), but felt this reflected only a small number of patients. However, recent evidence suggests that the frontotemporal dementia (FTD) may account for up to a quarter of patients presenting before the age of 65 (Snowden et al, 1996). Retrospective analysis of case notes using the NINCDSADRDA criteria (McKhann et al, 1984) for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease may well include many FTDs, as the criteria for a diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease are also features of this subgroup.
The diagnosis was reportedly confirmed in a proportion as part of a casecontrol study, although there is a risk of selection bias by possible exclusion of the more behaviourally challenging uncooperative FTD patients.
The unrepresentative nature of the pre-senile vascular dementia group is acknowledged by the authors, and patients with mixed Alzheimer's and vascular pathology are also likely to be included in this vascular category. To date it is unclear as to the degree to which the two conditions coexist. As it is apparent that the Alzheimer's disease group may also be unrepresentative, the question begs to be asked, what groups are actually being compared? The overall suggestion that pre-senile Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia have a similar prognosis needs to be taken in the context of these limitations and highlights the need for neuropathological studies in this area.
REFERENCES
Kay, D. W. K., Forster, D. P. & Newens, A. J.
(2000) Long-term survival, place of death, and death
certification in clinically diagnosed pre-senile dementia in northern England.
Follow-up after 8-12 years. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 177,
156-162.
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., et al
(1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of
the NINCDSADRDA work group and the auspices of Department of Health,
and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's disease.
Neurology, 34,
939-944.
Newens, A. J., Forster, D. P., Kay, D. W., et al (1993) Clinically diagnosed presenile dementia of the Alzheimer type in the Northern health region: ascertainment, prevalence, incidence, and survival. Psychological Medicine, 23, 631-644.[Medline]
Snowden, J. S., Neary, D. & Mann, D. M. A. (1996) Fronto-temporal lobar degeneration. In Fronto-Temporal Dementia, Progressive Aphasia, Semantic Dementia, pp. 1-227. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |