The British Journal of Psychiatry (2000) 177: 566
© 2000 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Ethnic differences in forensic hospitalisation
S. P. Sarkar
Broadmoor Hospital, Crowthorne, Berkshire RG45 7EG
EDITED BY MATTHEW HOTOPF
It is sobering to note that Coid et al
(2000) have once again found
that variations in compulsory hospitalisation cannot be entirely attributed to
racial bias, as some would lead us to believe. This was a large multi-centre
study that did not limit itself to inner-city areas. The authors must be
congratulated on their courage in challenging a popular and attractive myth
and at the same time suggesting that services should be culture-sensitive.
Regarding their question of whether (predominantly White) forensic
psychiatrists actively select White people with personality disorders as more
suitable for treatments such as psychotherapy in secure setting, the answer
may lie in the fact that maybe White people do have a greater chance of having
a personality disorder (and thus meriting treatment) than the Black or Asian
population. There is a study currently taking place at the Institute of
Psychiatry and Broadmoor Hospital which is looking at Black patients with
personality disorders, and the results should be most interesting. The Asian
people in this study show a less than expected degree of morbidity,
personality disorder, substance use and previous conviction, in spite of
sharing the same socio-economic disadvantage, which is consistent with current
knowledge. To paraphrase Freud, maybe a cigar is just a cigar.
REFERENCES
Coid, J., Kahtan, N., Gault, S., et al
(2000) Ethnic differences in admissions to secure forensic
psychiatry services. British Journal of Psychiatry,
177,
241-247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]