|
|
|||||||||||
Correspondence |
Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust, The Caludon Centre, Clifford Bridge Road, Walsgrave, Coventry CV2 2TE, UK
Division of Psychopharmacology, Queen's University and Kingston Psychiatric Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
Wileman et al
(2001) evaluated bright white
v. dim red light therapy for seasonal affective disorder in primary
care and reported no significant difference in the proportions of responders
in either group. Working on the basis of small trials having a large type II
error, the group size for each group can be estimated. For most statistical
tests, tables are available that show the power of the test to detect
specified differences for a given
and sample size, as well as tables
that show the required sample size to achieve selected power for specified
difference and given
(Machin &
Campbell, 1987; Cohen,
1988). In designing a clinical trial, we should select the power 1
ß to be at least 0.80, so that there is a chance of one in five
or less of missing an important difference between treatments.
The differences in response rates between the two groups even using the
broad remission criterion was 16.9%. To detect this difference at a
significance level
=0.05, power 80%, 160 patients are required in each
group (Freeman & Tyrer,
1992). However, only 57 patients in total were enrolled by Wileman
et al. This reduced the power of the tests to about 20% and strongly
suggests a type II error. It would therefore be misleading to conclude that
bright white light is not associated with greater improvement.
REFERENCES
Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd edn). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
Freeman, C. & Tyrer, P. (eds) (1992) Research Methods in Psychiatry (2nd edn), p. 52. London: Gaskell.
Machin, D. & Campbell, M. J. (1987) Statistical Tables for the Design of Clinical Trials. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
Wileman, S. M., Eagles, J. M., Andrew, J. E., et al
(2001) Light therapy for seasonal affective disorder in
primary care. Randomised controlled trial. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 178,
311-316.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |