This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
The British Journal of Psychiatry (2003) 182: 368-369
© 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


One hundred years ago

Royal Asylum of Montrose (Annual Report for 1900)

Researched by Henry Rollin, Emeritus Consultant Psychiatrist, Horton Hospital, Epsom, Surrey

Suicidal tendencies were marked in a large proportion of the patients admitted, and the inquiries of Sir John Sibbald now published for the first time show that Forfarshire and the neighbouring county of Kincardine have a larger proportion of suicides compared with the population than the rest of Scotland. The same authority states that ‘the counties of the east coast of Scotland all show higher suicidal rates than the western counties. It is curious that the city of Dundee shows a lower rate than the rest of Forfarshire. It is so far in favour of the view of those who say that Celticism and Catholicism prevent suicide, for Dundee contains the largest proportion of Irish Catholics of any part of Forfarshire’. Certain parishes in the two counties named send a very high proportion of suicidal patients to the asylum and suicides are specially frequent in these parishes. ‘A possible explanation of this,’ says Dr Havelock, ‘seems to be that of inherited predisposition for the suicidal tendency is strongly hereditary in most cases and is prone to increase unduly in districts where the population is stagnant and stationary. The whole subject is beset with problems of extreme interest and difficulty.’

REFERENCES

  1. Lancet, 25 January 1902, p. 252.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content