© 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Correspondence |
In defence of the case report
Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Cefn Coed Hospital, Waunarlwydd Road, Cockett, Swansea SA2 0GH, UK
During his ten years as Editor, Greg Wilkinson worked hard to produce a modern, polished journal with an impressive international reputation. In his valedictory editorial (Wilkinson, 2003) he sets out the goals he has pursued. Almost by definition, an editor cannot receive universal approbation. However, while I suspect that academic/research colleagues will have been happy with his stewardship, many clinicians are likely to have some reservations. The reason for this will be found in three lines in the middle of his final editorial: ‘I hastened the demise of the case report, to exclude what I see as psychiatric trivia. I published original research...’.
This is a cameo of the polarity that exists between academic, research-oriented psychiatrists and those clinicians who provide the bulk of the service in the National Health Service. They confirm the contemporary ethos that the only worth-while form of study is that of groups. The nomothetic approach takes precedence while the detailed study of an individual patient is marginalised as trivia.
Psychiatry is not unique in having been seduced by the scientific process. Unfortunately, it is doubtful how much the practice of our discipline has gained from this development (Shooter, 2003; Wilkinson, 2003). This is not surprising. Psychiatry is a discipline in which the information is ‘soft’ and much of it subjective. In contrast, the scientific approach insists that any parameter of illness that cannot be measured in terms of hard data is suspect.
As academic psychiatrists have become more influential within the profession and training is more university based, research and related activity are seen as the acme of psychiatric work. Working closely with patients and creating enduring therapeutic relationships is not valued and is sometimes seen as drudgery. This is a damning paradox. Is it surprising that it is hard to recruit into psychiatry – a specialty that is dismissive of the very core of its professional ethic?
Psychiatry needs to return to its core values (Simms, 2003). It needs to place the care and treatment of the individual patient centre-stage. Students, young doctors and psychiatric trainees must see at first hand the fascination and reward of working with patients, and see that the work is attractive and satisfying. A part of this process must be the rehabilitation of the detailed case report.
REFERENCES
- Shooter, M. (2003) On Pushto, principles and
passion: just what is an advance in psychiatric treatment? Advances
in Psychiatric Treatment, 9, 239
–240.
[Free Full Text] - Simms, A. (2003) ‘Back to basics’:
on not neglecting the elementary in continuing professional development.
Advances in Psychiatric Treatment,
9, 1
–2.
[Free Full Text] - Wilkinson, G. (2003) Fare thee well – the
Editor’s last words. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 182, 465
–466.
[Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. Procopio Publication of case reports The British Journal of Psychiatry, July 1, 2005; 187(1): 91 - 91. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. Enoch Case reports The British Journal of Psychiatry, February 1, 2005; 186(2): 169 - 169. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Bourne A new name for the Journal? The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2004; 184(5): 455 - 455. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||