HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hutchinson, G. Articles by Morgan, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hutchinson, G. Articles by Morgan, C.

Social development, urban environment and psychosis

Psychiatry Unit, Department of Clinical Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Champs Fleurs, Trinidad

C. Morgan

Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK

Van Os (2004) persuasively argues for a greater recognition of the urban environment as a justifiable and empirically sound aetiological factor in psychotic illness. The unanswered question, however, remains about the mechanism through which this environment increases the risk for psychosis. It seems necessary to suggest that perhaps psychiatric illness cannot be assessed under the generally accepted cause and effect rubric that defines other medical illnesses. This is mostly because there are no definitive or specific markers that can define the presence of the illness and, although genetic factors are associated with the risk for developing psychosis, the expression of illness is clearly an interaction with environmental factors (Tsuang et al, 2001).

Van Os notes that the medium of risk exposure is likely to be widespread and cumulative over the course of development. This further suggests that the presentation of psychosis represents a culmination of an ongoing interaction between an individual and his/her environment. This remains the only reasonable explanation for the variation in incidence rates, particularly those reported for migrant populations in Britain and Europe (Hutchinson & Haasen, 2004). Interactions between perceptions of self, cognitive processes and the features of a modern urban environment underlie social development. The relative weighting of vulnerability and resilience factors is a function of this interaction and must in turn be affected by wider social issues such as racism, socioeconomic opportunity and perceived social isolation. There is also the generational transfer of unfulfilled expectations and distrust of institutional structures. The problems in mental health for migrants in Britain are mirrored in the education and criminal justice systems (Modood et al, 1997). This suggests a developmental trajectory that is affected by social and generational realities and at the same time increases the risk of presentation with psychotic symptoms.

This would mean that the risk exposure for psychosis lies not specifically in the urban environment but in the way this environment generates and/or facilitates a life course that ultimately disadvantages those whose vulnerability is not compensated for by the support of their social environment. This is also influenced by the individual’s perception of the negative experiences of the ethnic and socio-cultural groups with which they identify in both the narrow family and community sense as well as the wider national and international sense.

There might therefore be a need to reconstruct the neurodevelopmental model which has led to a preoccupation with the biology of psychosis to include a social developmental model that can demonstrate how the neurobiological endpoint of psychosis can have both biological and social origins.

REFERENCES

Hutchinson, G. & Haasen, C. (2004) Migration and schizophrenia. The challenges for European psychiatry and implications for the future. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 350 -357.[CrossRef][Medline]

Modood, T., Berthoud, R., Lakey, J., et al (1997) Ethnic Minorities in Britain: Diversity and Disadvantage. London: Policy Studies Institute.

Tsuang, M. T., Stone, W. S. & Faraone, S. V. (2001) Genes, environment and schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (suppl. 40), s18 -s24.

Van Os, J. (2004) Does the urban environment cause psychosis? British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 287 -288.[Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. SPAUWEN, L. KRABBENDAM, R. LIEB, H.-U. WITTCHEN, and J. VAN OS Impact of psychological trauma on the development of psychotic symptoms: relationship with psychosis proneness The British Journal of Psychiatry, June 1, 2006; 188(6): 527 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. D. Maharajh, J. P. Selten, E. C. Zeyl, and P. N. van Harten Urban environment and schizophrenia * Authors' reply: The British Journal of Psychiatry, October 1, 2005; 187(4): 387 - 388. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hutchinson, G. Articles by Morgan, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hutchinson, G. Articles by Morgan, C.