The British Journal of Psychiatry (2005) 186: 447-448
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Combating editorial racism
S. Ramaiah
Walsall NHS Primary CareTrust, Lichfield House, 2731 Lichfield
Street, Walsall WS1 1TE, UK.
Correspondence:
E-mail:
sam.ramaiah{at}walsall.nhs.uk
EDITED BY KHALIDA ISMAIL
Peter Tyrer (2005) has set
out a number of ways by which the British Journal of Psychiatry will
attempt to minimise editorial racism and he acknowledges that this is only the
beginning of a long journey. Nevertheless, he ought to be congratulated for
his vision. His proposal to increase the number of corresponding editors from
low- and middle-income countries is commendable, although I would like to see
an increase in peer reviewers who have, like corresponding editors, an
understanding of the issues in these countries. Otherwise, reviewers, who I am
sure are fair-minded professionals, will continue to judge papers from poorer
countries on the same basis as those submitted from rich countries, thereby
perpetuating the problem of disproportionate publication. Surely there must be
reviewers who will undertake this task if not, appropriate
professionals need to be encouraged to get involved so that they can make a
significant contribution to ending editorial racism. Additionally, their
participation will also encourage greater opportunities for publications from
researchers from poorer countries which in itself, I believe, is a worthy
cause.
REFERENCES
Tyrer, P. (2005) Combating editorial racism in
psychiatric publications. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 186, 1
3.[Free Full Text]