Schizophrenia Research Group, Department of Clinical Neurology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford and Prince of Wales International Centre for SANE Research, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
Schizophrenia Research Group, Department of Clinical Neurology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford and Prince of Wales International Centre for SANE Research, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
Correspondence: Professor T. J. Crow, Prince of Wales International Centre for SANE Research, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK. Tel: +44 (0) 1865 455917; fax: +44 (0) 1865 455922; e-mail: tim.crow{at}psych.ox.ac.uk
Declaration of interest None. Funding details in Acknowledgements.
|
|
|---|
Aims To replicate these findings and extend them to both hemispheres.
Method Neuronal density, size and shape were estimated in the prefrontal cortex (Brodmann area 9) of the left and right hemispheres of brains taken post-mortem from 10 people with schizophrenia and 10 without mental illness (6 men, 4 women in both groups).
Results Overall neuronal density (individually corrected for shrinkage) did not differ between the groups. In the control brains, density was generally greater in the left than the right hemisphere, the reverse was seen in the schizophrenia brains; this loss or reversal of asymmetry was most significant in cortical layer 3. Pyramidal neurons in this cell layer were significantly larger on the left and more spherical in shape than on the right side in control brains, but size and shape did not differ between the two sides in schizophrenia. Non-pyramidal and glial cell densities were unchanged.
Conclusions We failed to find an increase in neuronal density, but found evidence at a cellular level of loss or reversal of asymmetry, consistent with the hypothesis of a primary change in the relative development of areas of heteromodal association cortex in the two hemispheres.
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
Table 1 Demographic details of sample
|
Blocks of tissue containing the superior and middle frontal gyri from the
middle of both the right and left frontal lobes were embedded in 12%
celloidin, sectioned at 60 mm and stained with cresyl violet. Shrinkage
(assumed to be three-dimensionally uniform) associated with embedding in
celloidin was estimated as follows: the cross-sectional area of the block was
measured before and after embedding and staining; the volume of the block was
inferred from these estimates of cross-sectional area: volume equals the
square root of the area cubed, i.e.
V=(
A)3. Shrinkage due to formalin fixation
was not estimated.
Three sections per hemisphere per case (that is, three from the left and three from the right) were assessed. All sections were from the superior frontal gyrus exhibiting cytoarchitectural features of BA 9: that is, a thin layer 2, pyramidal cells in layer 3 gradually increasing in size with depth, bilaminar layer 5 and indistinct layer 6. Cell counts were made using an Olympus BX40 microscope and x 100 objective lens under oil. The microscope was connected to a video camera and the image displayed on a computer monitor. A guard was used, with guard depths at the top of the section set at a minimum of 10 µm. Cells were counted within an optically defined volume of tissue, based on the principle of the optical disector as described by Williams & Rakic (1988), with a disector of 25 µm thickness. The dimensions of the counting box were 39 µm x 31 µm x 25 µm, height being determined using a digital gauge (microcator) attached to the microscope stage. All neurons whose nucleoli were either completely within the counting box or intersecting the back, right or bottom of the box were counted. Neurons were not counted if their nucleoli touched the front, left or top of the box (for glia, the boundary of the cell was used to determine inclusion or exclusion in the counting box). Neurons with a triangular profile were considered to be pyramidal; all other neurons were classed as non-pyramidal. Neurons were distinguished from glia by the presence of Nissl substance and a clearly visible nucleolus. All cells (other than vessel-associated cells) were placed in one of the three categories: pyramidal, non-pyramidal or glial cells. Counting boxes were placed sequentially from the pial surface to the boundary between the grey and white matter, to give a single vertical probe extending through all six layers of the cortex. Five of these probes were positioned in areas exhibiting the cytoarchitectural features of BA 9 (Rajkowska & Goldman-Rakic, 1995), where the plane of sectioning was perpendicular to the grain of the cortical laminae and where there were no major tears or artefacts obscuring the cortex. Cell density was estimated in five probes in both the left and the right prefrontal cortex - i.e. ten probes per brain - to give an estimate of neuronal and glial density in each hemisphere overall and in each cortical lamina. This sampling protocol was chosen to mirror that of Selemon et al. An indication of the precision of the sampling protocol is given by the coefficient of error (CE), which was calculated in ten cases using the method of Braendgaard et al (1990). A CE of less than 10% is considered acceptable. All estimates of neuronal density were performed masked to clinical details by one person (T.J.C.).
All estimates of neuronal density are reported after individual correction for shrinkage using the following formula: neuronal density = (average number of neurons per counting box/volume of the counting box) x (volume of block after embedding/volume of block prior to embedding).
Measurement of cell size and shape
Cell size and shape measurements were made masked to diagnosis using
KS400.3 imaging software (Imaging Associates, Bicester, UK). Pyramidal neurons
were sampled from layer 3 (easily identified from layers 2 and 4, having small
pyramidal neurons at the top of layer 3, which ranged down to large pyramidal
neurons at the bottom, and clearly distinct from the small circular
interneurons of layer 4). Three sections were taken from each hemisphere of
each brain. Pyramidal neurons were identified by their shape and the presence
of a single, large apical dendrite extending vertically toward the pial
surface. Three sweeps were made through layer 3 from each hemisphere, and
pyramidal neurons were sampled systematically from the top to the bottom of
layer 3. By focusing up and down through the section, we measured neurons only
when they had a visible nucleolus, and this was the point at which the neurons
had the greatest area. Measurements were made by manually tracing around the
perimeter of the neuron, and cell area and shape (Fcircle,
a function relating area to perimeter: 1 denoting a circle, 0 denoting a
triangle; Law & Harrison,
2003) were calculated. An average of 120 (range 60-200) pyramidal
neurons per brain were measured from each hemisphere.
Statistical analysis
A repeated-measures analysis of variance with side as the within-subject
factor was performed to test for differences in overall neuronal and glial
density and cortical thickness between the two groups. A P value of
0.05, two-tailed, was chosen as the threshold for statistical significance.
This analysis was repeated separately for each cortical layer. For these
post hoc analyses we used a Bonferroni correction of 6 to yield a
significant P value of 0.0083, two-tailed. The possible confounding
effects of duration in formalin, post-mortem interval, age at death, brain
weight, age at onset and duration of illness were analysed using Pearson's
correlation coefficient. Paired t-tests were used to compare cell
sizes and shapes in layer 3 in right and left hemispheres.
|
|
|---|
Shrinkage
Embedding in celloidin resulted in variable shrinkage from brain to brain
(pre- to post-embedding ratios 0.5 to 0.82), but the mean and scatter were
closely similar in the two sample groups.
Neuronal density
The mean total neuronal density for the schizophrenia series was 35 000
(s.d.=6500) per mm3 on the left and 38 200 (s.d.=3600) per
mm3 on the right; for the control series, the corresponding values
were 41 500 (s.d.=8600) per mm3 and 36 200 (s.d.=5700) per
mm3 respectively. In the control group brains total neuronal
density was generally greater in the left hemisphere, the reverse pattern
being observed in the schizophrenia brains (F=12.0, d.f.=1,18,
P=0.003) (Fig. 1(a)).
Overall total neuronal density - the average of left and right values - did
not differ between the two series (F=0.78, d.f.=1,18,
P=0.39) (Fig.
2(a)).
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide] |
Fig. 1 (a) Overall neuronal density in left and right hemispheres of the
schizophrenia and control group brains. (b) Neuronal cell density in layer 3
of the left and right hemispheres of the schizophrenia and control group
brains.
|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide] |
Fig. 2 Comparison of schizophrenia and control group brains. (a) Average neuronal
density. (b) Glial density.
|
Table 2 gives the estimates for neuronal density for each cortical layer together with an analysis of the group and side comparisons. After Bonferroni correction, only layer 3 was significantly different in schizophrenia (see Fig. 1(b)), although there was a trend towards significance in layers 2 and 6. There was no correlation between neuronal density and age at death (r=0.228, d.f.=1.18, P=0.333), post-mortem interval (r=-0.299, d.f.=1,18, P=0.201) or time stored in formalin (r=-0.252, d.f.=1,18, P=0.285).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
Table 2 Neuronal density
|
The mean pyramidal neuronal density for the schizophrenia group was 21 900 (s.d.=4000) per mm3 on the left and 25 600 (s.d.=3300) per mm3 on the right; for the comparison group the corresponding values were 24 700 (s.d.=5800) per mm3 and 23 100 (s.d.=3900) per mm3 respectively. Estimates of pyramidal neuronal density for each cortical layer and the results of statistical analysis are given in Table 3. Although there was a trend towards a significant effect in layers 3 and 6, the P values of 0.014 and 0.009 respectively were not significant after Bonferroni correction.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
Table 3 Pyramidal neuronal density
|
The mean density of non-pyramidal neurons in the schizophrenia group was 13 100 (s.d.=3700) per mm3 on the left and 12 600 (s.d.=2300) per mm3 on the right; for the comparison group the corresponding values were 16 800 (s.d.=6500) per mm3 and 13 100 (s.d.=3200) per mm3 respectively. These differences between groups and between sides were not significant.
Pyramidal cell size and shape
Table 4 gives the mean
cross-sectional area of pyramidal neurons in cortical layer 3. Pyramidal
neurons in layer 3 were larger on the left than the right in control brains
(P < 0.008) but were equal in size on the two sides in the
schizophrenia brains. Pyramidal cell size did not correlate with any of the
demographic variables, although there was a trend towards a negative
correlation with age at death (r=-0.432, d.f.=16, P=0.073).
The index of pyramidal cell shape revealed an asymmetry in layer 3 (left >
right), reflecting neurons being shorter and/or fatter in the left hemisphere
in the comparison group, but with no asymmetry in the schizophrenia group.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
Table 4 Cross-sectional area and shape of pyramidal neurons in cortical layer 3
|
Glial density
The overall glial density was 16 500 (s.d.=3460) per mm3 for the
schizophrenia group and 16 600 (s.d.=5100) per mm3 for the
comparison group. These values did not differ between the two groups
(F=0.004, d.f.=1,18, P=0.950)
(Fig. 2(b)). There was no
correlation between glial density and age at death (r=-0.076,
d.f.=1,18, P=0.749), post-mortem interval (r=0.002,
d.f.=1,18, P=0.995) or time stored in formalin (r=-0.306, d.f.=1,18,
P=0.189). Glial density correlated with overall neuronal density
(r=0.52, d.f.=1,18, P=0.020) and pyramidal cell density
(r=0.62, d.f.=1,18, P=0.004), but not with non-pyramidal
cell density (r=0.22, d.f.=1,18, P=0.35).
Cortical thickness
Total cortical thickness did not differ between groups, nor did the
proportion contributed by each cortical lamina
(Table 5). Cortical thickness
correlated inversely with overall neuronal density (r=-0.64, d.f.=18,
P=0.002) and non-pyramidal neuronal density (r=-0.75,
d.f.=18, P < 0.001), but not with pyramidal cell density
(r=-0.28, d.f.=18, P=0.23) or glial density
(r=-0.008, d.f.=18, P=0.973).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
Table 5 Total cortical thickness and percentage contribution of each cortical layer
to total thickness
|
|
|
|---|
Our results contrast with those of Selemon et al, who found that in people with schizophrenia neuronal density was increased by 17% in left BA 9 (Selemon et al, 1995, 1998). We believe that methodological factors are unlikely to explain the differences between the findings, since both groups used similar methods: celloidin embedding and a nearly identical counting protocol. Furthermore, subtle differences in the delineation of anatomical areas are an improbable explanation, since Selemon et al found raised neuronal density in the area of cortex beside BA 9 (i.e. BA 46) and also in primary visual cortex, although in a subsequent study not in BA 44 (Selemon et al, 2003). Pakkenberg (1993) also found an increase in neuronal density in the frontal lobe considered as a single entity. It is possible that the differences between the findings in different studies relate to shrinkage; although shrinkage due to embedding varied markedly from case to case in our study, the mean shrinkage for each group was nearly identical.
A possible explanation for an increase in neuronal density is a reduction in the volume of grey matter observed in vivo in some magnetic resonance imaging studies of schizophrenia (McCarley et al, 1991). In our study and those of Selemon et al (1995, 1998) cortical thickness correlated inversely with neuronal density. Cortical thickness was non-significantly reduced in the Selemon et al studies; in our study the cortex was not thinner and there was no evidence of a change that was selective to a particular cortical layer (see Table 5). Whether or not the changes observed in BA 9 by Selemon et al are attributable to a change in cortical width, this clearly cannot be the explanation for the decrease in density on the left side in our investigation. Our findings in the left hemisphere are similar to those of Benes et al (1986), who noted a non-significant 27% reduction in neuron density in layer 3 - in addition to a significant reduction in neuronal density in layer 6 - of BA 10 of the prefrontal cortex in the brains of seven individuals with schizophrenia. (One of the strengths of the Benes et al study was that tissue shrinkage was minimised by cutting sections on a vibratome, thereby eliminating the need for paraffin embedding.) Cotter et al (2002) used a two-dimensional method to estimate neuronal density in BA 9 of the prefrontal cortex of the brains (hemisphere unspecified) of 15 people with schizophrenia and 15 normal controls. They found no evidence that neuronal density was altered in schizophrenia relative to controls.
We thus failed to confirm the hypothesis that schizophrenia is associated with an increase in neuronal density in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; instead, we found evidence of loss or reversal of asymmetry. We think it unlikely that a change that is differentially distributed between brain hemispheres is related to neuroleptic or other treatments that the patients might have received, and conclude therefore that it must in some way be related to the disease process. With other indices of morphological change in this brain series we have evidence of either a loss of asymmetry (e.g. in the pulvinar; Highley et al, 2003) or a reversal of asymmetry (e.g. in length measures over the dorsal surface of the cortex; Highley et al, 1998) and of loss or reversal of asymmetry of the volume of the superior temporal gyrus (Highley et al, 1999) and the parahippocampal and fusiform gyri (McDonald et al, 2000). The relative change in density of neurons in the two hemispheres (which survived Bonferroni correction) in layer 3 was paralleled by a loss of asymmetry of pyramidal cell size and shape. Thus the findings suggest an alternative to the pathophysiology proposed by Selemon et al - that the reduction in connectivity in schizophrenia is not generalised or specifically related to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Selemon et al, 2003), but relates to the connections between the two hemispheres, or to differential changes within each hemisphere. Asymmetry of the Sylvian fissure was first reported by Eberstaller (1884), and this and other asymmetries - for example of the planum temporale (Geschwind & Levitsky, 1968) - reflect a torque or bias in the structure of the cerebral cortex across the anteroposterior axis from right frontal to left occipital (Witelson & Kigar, 1988). We assume that the torque is in some way related to the asymmetry in density of pyramidal and other cellular components of the cortex that we observe in BA 9 of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. There is evidence, for example from the minicolumn structure of the planum, that these asymmetries distinguish the cerebral cortex of humans from that of other primates (Buxhoeveden et al, 2001). A number of macroscopic alterations of cerebral asymmetry have been reported in schizophrenia in imaging and post-mortem studies (Crow, 1990, 1997; Petty, 1999; Sommer et al, 2001). Our study indicates that these have a correlate at the cellular level. If the primary change in psychosis is an anomaly of development of the relationship between the hemispheres, this is consistent with the concept that the disorder relates to those areas of the cerebral cortex (such as heteromodal association areas) that developed last in hominid evolution and go on developing late in ontogeny.
We note some previous evidence of neuronal size asymmetries in the literature. Hayes & Lewis (1995) reported that the large layer 3 pyramidal neurons that they identified in BA 45 of Broca's area were larger in the left hemisphere than in the right, as in the controls in the current study. By contrast, in the orbitofrontal cortex Cotter et al (2005) observed in individuals without mental illness asymmetry of cell size to the right. Interestingly, this asymmetry was reversed (cell size was smaller on the right than on the left) in both patients with bipolar disorder and major depression, but unchanged in patients with schizophrenia.
|
|
|---|
LIMITATIONS
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related articles in BJP:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Fornito, M. Yucel, B. Dean, S. J. Wood, and C. Pantelis Anatomical Abnormalities of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Schizophrenia: Bridging the Gap Between Neuroimaging and Neuropathology Schizophr Bull, September 1, 2009; 35(5): 973 - 993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Cerqueira, R. Taipa, H. B. M. Uylings, O. F. X. Almeida, and N. Sousa Specific Configuration of Dendritic Degeneration in Pyramidal Neurons of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex Induced by Differing Corticosteroid Regimens Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2007; 17(9): 1998 - 2006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kreczmanski, H. Heinsen, V. Mantua, F. Woltersdorf, T. Masson, N. Ulfig, R. Schmidt-Kastner, H. Korr, H. W. M. Steinbusch, P. R. Hof, et al. Volume, neuron density and total neuron number in five subcortical regions in schizophrenia Brain, March 1, 2007; 130(3): 678 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||