The British Journal of Psychiatry (2006) 188: 107-108. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.014985
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
The future of cognitivebehavioural therapy for psychosis: not a quasi-neuroleptic
MAX BIRCHWOOD, DSc
Birmingham Early Intervention Service, Birmingham and Solihull Mental
Health Trust, Birmingham
PETER TROWER, PhD
School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Correspondence:
Professor Max J. Birchwood, Director, Birmingham Early Intervention Service,
Birmingham and Solihull Mental HealthTrust, Harry Watton House, 97 Church
Lane, Aston, Birmingham B6 5UG, UK. E-mail:
m.j.birchwood.20{at}bham.ac.uk
Declaration of interest None.
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Summary Some 20 trials of cognitive behavioural therapy
(CBT) for psychosis have re-established psychotherapy as a credible treatment
for psychosis. However, it is not without its detractors and problems,
including uncertainty about the nature of its active ingredients. We believe
that the way forward is to abandon the neuroleptic metaphor of CBT for
psychosis and to develop targeted interventions that are informed by the
growing understanding of the interface between emotion and psychosis.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
How times have changed! It was not long ago that talking to people about
their psychotic beliefs was deemed impossible or harmful. Yet
cognitivebehavioural therapy (CBT) for psychosis is now recommended by
the National Institute for Clinical Excellence
(2002) to reduce
psychotic symptoms, increase insight and promote medication adherence.
This mainly British innovation has been based on some 20 randomised controlled
trials (Tarrier & Wykes,
2004) using predominantly standard psychosis outcomes (Positive
and Negative Syndrome Scale and relapse). CBT for psychosis has mirrored the
evaluation of neuroleptics to reestablish psychotherapy as a credible
treatment for psychosis, and it has succeeded. But was this the right approach
and are we moving in the right direction? The development and evaluation of
CBT for psychosis have tended to follow the drug metaphor in the way that they
have pragmatically applied an intervention that is successful in treating one
disorder (in this case depression) to another (psychosis), and applied the
same criteria for success (psychosis symptoms and relapse). We have
participated in this development, but we believe that it has led to many
unintended consequences that cannot be rectified without a decisive change of
course. Contemporary CBT for psychosis began in the 1980s with the work of
Tarrier and colleagues which aimed to help patients to cope with their
symptoms (Tarrier et al,
1993). At the same time, Chadwick & Lowe
(1990) showed that it was
possible to reality test delusional beliefs. Then followed the
full armamentarium of CBT, emphasising individual formulation and bringing in
the assumptions and techniques that are used for patients with depression,
including an emphasis on dysfunctional thinking styles, early trauma, etc. As
in so many areas of psychiatry, practice has run ahead of theory.
One of the main consequences of this has been well highlighted by
Turkington et al
(2003), who express concern
that CBT for psychosis now refers to a wide range of CBT treatments which vary
in length and emphasis, and call for greater precision in identifying their
active elements. They argue for further trials with better control groups and
process measures to assist in this enterprise.
 |
WHAT IS COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL THERAPY?
|
|---|
Cognitivebehavioural therapy is a therapy for emotional disorders
which has its own well-validated assumptions about what is responsible for
those disorders (maladaptive cognitions), in the context of certain adverse
life circumstances. At the heart of this is the link between thinking and
emotion/behaviour that emotional and behavioural responses are largely
influenced by the cognitive appraisals that are made and recent
evidence suggests that cognition and emotion can mutually influence one
another. In retrospect it is curious (and it seems to have gone unnoticed)
that a therapy for (and theory of) affective disorder was considered
appropriate for a non-affective illness. It is even more curious
that only a minority of trials of CBT for psychosis have used distress and
emotional dysfunction as a secondary outcome, and only one has used it as a
primary outcome. Is this still CBT? Or has CBT for psychosis strayed from its
conceptual roots and become something else?
 |
THE REMARRIAGE OF EMOTION AND PSYCHOSIS
|
|---|
Emotion and psychosis were divorced from one another in the middle of the
20th century, principally by Jaspers, who argued that we should separate
affective illness from madness proper
(Jaspers, 1963). Recent years
have seen a renewed courtship (Birchwood,
2003; Freeman & Garety,
2003). First, there is well-documented evidence of the sheer scale
of affective disorder in psychosis (unhelpfully referred to as
comorbidity), including depression, social anxiety and
post-traumatic stress disorder (Birchwood,
2003). Second, factor-analytical studies of psychosis symptoms
have revealed that depression is a distinct dimension of psychosis
(Murray et al, 2005).
Third, there is now strong evidence that the way in which people make sense of
anomalous (primary) experiences such as voices provides the main causal
pathway to distress and depression associated with these experiences
(Birchwood et al,
2004), and the same is true for the way in which people react to
the diagnosis (post-psychotic depression;
Iqbal et al, 2000). In
other words, distress and behaviour associated with psychotic symptoms may not
always be caused by the presence of psychotic experience per
se, but rather they may result from the appraisal of it (e.g. its
potential for threat). The primacy of distress is a core principle of CBT, but
CBT for psychosis has not always followed this, given its primary emphasis on
psychosis outcomes.
Emotion is now clearly implicated in the ontogeny of psychosis.
Epidemiological studies have revealed that neuroticism is a
major risk factor for psychosis
(Krabbendam et al,
2002), and there is evidence for an affective pathway to psychosis
(Hanssen et al, 2003).
In studies of the transition to psychosis in high-risk populations, or of the
transition to relapse, it has been found that depression, anxiety and in
particular social anxiety are among the strongest predictors
(Owens et al, 2005).
This interaction is complex and may involve cortical processes in affect
regulation and common psychosocial developmental pathways
(Birchwood, 2003). It will be
crucial to gain an understanding of the nature of this interaction through
laboratory studies and also through the action of CBT for psychosis.
As CBT for psychosis was developed further in the 1990s, the role and
magnitude of emotional dysfunction in nonaffective psychosis
were not recognised. This resulted in a pragmatic application of CBT technique
to delusions, and to assumptions being made about dysfunctional thinking and
the genesis of psychosis.
 |
COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL THERAPY FOR (EMOTIONAL DYSFUNCTION IN) PSYCHOSIS
|
|---|
We believe that further large-scale pragmatic trials of CBT for psychosis,
as currently designed (beyond those in progress), will neither shed further
light on the active agents of CBT for psychosis nor initiate a process that
will improve the effectiveness or specificity of CBT for psychosis. In fact
they run the risk of doing the opposite. The next generation of therapy needs
to focus on theory-driven studies of emotional dysfunction and/or behavioural
anomaly in psychosis, including treatment studies which are themselves
effective in ameliorating distress, but which may also have a secondary effect
on the psychotic phenomena. Some possible foci are listed below.
- CBT can be used to reduce distress, depression and problem behaviour
associated with persecutory delusions and voices. For example, Trower et
al (2004) demonstrated a
reduction in compliance with command hallucinations and distress without a
reduction in voice activity.
- CBT can focus on anxiety, depression and interpersonal difficulty in
individuals at high risk of developing psychosis. Morrison et al
(2004) conducted a randomised
controlled trial of CBT to prevent transition to psychosis in a high-risk
group, and focused principally on these problems rather than on the attenuated
psychosis symptoms that defined the high-risk group.
- CBT can focus on the relapse prodrome to prevent relapse in psychosis.
Gumley et al (2003)
demonstrated a reduction in relapse as a result of working with the earliest
(affective) signs of relapse and the way in which patients catastrophised
them.
- CBT can focus on comorbid depression and social anxiety,
including the patients appraisal of the diagnosis and its stigmatising
consequences (Iqbal et al,
2000).
- CBT can be used to reduce stress reactivity, thereby increasing resilience
to life stress and preventing psychotic relapse
(Myin-Germeys et al,
2005).
- CBT can be used to increase self-esteem and social confidence in people
with psychosis (Hall & Tarrier,
2003).
 |
CONCLUSIONS
|
|---|
We believe that the future development and improvement of CBT for psychosis
require us to move decisively away from the neuroleptic metaphor. Neuroleptics
do what neuroleptics do. The future of CBT for psychosis lies in understanding
the (cognitive) interface between emotion and psychosis and in developing
interventions either to resolve emotional/behavioural dysfunction alone or to
prevent or mitigate psychosis and its positive symptoms. Thus CBT can sit
alongside the neuroleptics with a distinctive and complementary emphasis,
rather than merely being brought on as a substitute in extra time.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
Birchwood, M. (2003) Pathways to emotional
dysfunction in first-episode psychosis. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 182, 373
375.[Free Full Text]Birchwood, M., Gilbert, P., Gilbert, J., et al
(2004) Interpersonal and role-related schemata influence the
relationship with the dominantvoice in schizophrenia: a
comparison of three models. Psychological Medicine,
34, 1571
1580.[Medline]
Chadwick, P. D. & Lowe, C. F. (1990)
Measurement and modification of delusional beliefs. Journal of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology,
58, 225
232.[CrossRef][Medline]
Freeman, D. & Garety, P. A. (2003)
Connecting neurosis and psychosis: the direct influence of emotion on
delusions and hallucinations. Behaviour Research and
Therapy, 41, 923
947.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gumley, A., OGrady, M., McNay, L., et al
(2003) Early intervention for relapse in schizophrenia:
results of a 12-month randomized controlled trial of cognitive
behavioural therapy. Psychological Medicine,
33, 419
431.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hall, P. L. & Tarrier, N. (2003) The
cognitive behavioural treatment of low self-esteem in psychotic
patients: a pilot study. Behaviour ResearchTherapy,
41, 317
332.
Hanssen, M. S., Peeters, F., Krabbendam, L., et al
(2003) How psychotic are individuals with nonpsychotic
disorders? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric
Epidemiology, 38, 149
154.[CrossRef][Medline]
Iqbal, Z., Birchwood, M., Chadwick, P., et al
(2000) Cognitive approach to depression and suicidal thinking
in psychosis: 2. Testing the validity of a social ranking model.
British Journal of Psychiatry,
177, 522
528.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Jaspers, K. (1963) General
Psychopathology (trans. J. Hoening & M. Hamilton).
Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Krabbendam, L., Janssen, I., Bijl, R. V., et al
(2002) Neuroticism and low self-esteem as risk factors for
psychosis. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric
Epidemiology, 37, 1
6.[CrossRef][Medline]
Morrison, A. P., French, P., Walford, L., et al
(2004) Cognitive therapy for the prevention of psychosis in
people at ultra-high risk: randomised controlled trial. British
Journal of Psychiatry, 185, 291
297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Murray, V., McKee, I., Miller, P. M., et al
(2005) Dimensions and classes of psychosis in a population
cohort: a four-class, four-dimension model of schizophrenia and affective
psychoses. Psychological Medicine,
35, 499
510.[CrossRef][Medline]
Myin-Germeys, I., Delespaul, P. & van Os, J.
(2005) Behavioural sensitization to daily life stress in
psychosis. Psychological Medicine,
35, 733
741.[CrossRef][Medline]
National Institute for Clinical Excellence
(2002) Core Interventions in the Management of
Schizophrenia in Secondary and Primary Care. London:
NICE.
Owens, D. G. C., Miller, P., Lawrie, S. M., et al
(2005) Pathogenesis of schizophrenia: a psychopathological
perspective. British Journal of Psychiatry,
186, 386
393.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Tarrier, N. & Wykes, T. (2004) Is there
evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy is an effective treatment
for schizophrenia? A cautious or cautionary tale? Behaviour
Research and Therapy, 42, 1377
1401.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tarrier, N., Beckett, R., Harwood, S., et al
(1993) A trial of two cognitive behavioural methods
of treating drug-resistant residual psychotic symptoms in schizophrenic
patients. I. Outcome. British Journal of Psychiatry,
162, 524
532.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Trower, P., Birchwood, M. & Meaden, A.
(2004) Cognitive therapy for command hallucinations:
randomised controlled trial. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 184, 312
320.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Turkington, D., Kingdon, D. & Chadwick, P.
(2003) Cognitive behavioural therapy for
schizophrenia: filling the therapeutic vacuum. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 183, 98
99.[Free Full Text]
Received for publication July 6, 2005.
Revision received September 16, 2005.
Accepted for publication September 30, 2005.
Related articles in BJP:
-
- PETER TYRER
BJP 2006 188: 198.
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Garety, D. G. Fowler, D. Freeman, P. Bebbington, G. Dunn, and E. Kuipers
Cognitive-behavioural therapy and family intervention for relapse prevention and symptom reduction in psychosis: randomised controlled trial
The British Journal of Psychiatry,
June 1, 2008;
192(6):
412 - 423.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- Participation in CBT for Psychosis Treatments
- Keith J Gaynor, et al.
- BJP Online, 10 Feb 2006
[Full text]