BJP Email content delivery - eTOCs !
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The British Journal of Psychiatry (2006) 188: 199-201. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.020644
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJP
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ZAMMIT, S.
Right arrow Articles by OWEN, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ZAMMIT, S.
Right arrow Articles by OWEN, M. J.

EDITORIALS

Stressful life events, 5-HTT genotype and risk of depression{dagger}

STANLEY ZAMMIT, PhD, MRCPsych

Department of Psychological Medicine, Cardiff University and Division of Psychiatry, University of Bristol

MICHAEL J. OWEN, PhD, FRCPsych

Department of Psychological Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

Correspondence: Dr Stanley Zammit, Department of Psychological Medicine, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK. Fax: +44 (0)29 2074 7839; e-mail: zammits{at}cardiff.ac.uk

Declaration of interest M.J.O. is a consultantto GlaxoSmith Kline and has received honoraria for academic talks from Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmith Kline.

{dagger} See pp. 210–215, this issue. Back


   ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS
 5-HTT, STRESSFUL LIFE EVENTS...
 SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
 EVIDENCE AGAINST
 WEIGHING UP THE EVIDENCE
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Studies of how genetic and environmental exposures interact may be essential for understanding the aetiology of complex psychiatric disorders. In this issue of the Journal an Australian study reports evidence of such an interaction on risk of depression. We discuss findings in this field in the context of the limitations inherent in studies of gene–environment interactions.


   INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS
 5-HTT, STRESSFUL LIFE EVENTS...
 SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
 EVIDENCE AGAINST
 WEIGHING UP THE EVIDENCE
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The processes underlying psychiatric disease are clearly extremely complex. Studies of how genes and environment interact and affect vulnerability to risk of disease are likely to contribute substantially to our understanding of these processes. The study by Wilhelm et al (2006, this issue) adds to a growing body of literature suggesting that the effects of stressful life events on risk of depression may be dependent on variation at the 5-HTTLPR locus of the serotonin transporter (5-HTT) gene. The study of gene–environment interactions, although clearly important, is beset with a number of potential problems, and we discuss these findings within this context.


   GENE–ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS
 5-HTT, STRESSFUL LIFE EVENTS...
 SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
 EVIDENCE AGAINST
 WEIGHING UP THE EVIDENCE
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
A situation where risk from an environmental exposure varies according to genotype or where genotype effect varies according to environment is known as gene–environment interaction, or effect modification. Studies of genetic effects stratified by environmental exposures, or vice versa, may increase our ability to find evidence of risk or protective factors for disease, and increase understanding of pathophysiology. They may also allow more accurate estimation of effect sizes within population subgroups, and–although difficulties in implementing change in high-risk groups are substantial–may allow for specific targeting of interventions in the future.

Studies of interactions need to be approached with caution for a number of reasons. First, sub-analyses inevitably result in more statistical tests and consequently increased likelihood of type I errors. Second, the smaller numbers of events within comparison groups lead to reduced statistical power, which will only be offset in the presence of a strong interaction effect. Third, evidence for statistical interaction does not provide direct evidence of biological interaction. Evidence of statistical interaction depends on the mathematical model used and, as the null hypothesis is that joint exposure effects on outcome are as described by the model, rejecting this hypothesis has less clear biological meaning than for the study of main effects (Clayton & McKeigue, 2001).


   5-HTT, STRESSFUL LIFE EVENTS AND DEPRESSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS
 5-HTT, STRESSFUL LIFE EVENTS...
 SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
 EVIDENCE AGAINST
 WEIGHING UP THE EVIDENCE
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Evidence for an interaction between 5-HTTLPR genotype and adult depression was first reported in the Dunedin birth cohort (Caspi et al, 2003). Presence of the short (‘s’) allele of 5-HTTLPR reduces in vitro gene transcription and transporter activity compared with the long (‘l’) allele, resulting in increased synaptic levels of serotonin. In this study, presence of stressful life events was associated with an increase in risk of depression in heterozygous individuals and in those homozygous for the ‘s’ allele, but not in ‘l/l’ homozygotes. Five studies have since reported similar deleterious effects of adverse events on depression, modified by the underlying genotype at this locus (studies 2–6 in Table 1). In these studies the interaction effect was in the same direction as the original finding, although it was only observed in women in two of the studies. Some of these results, however, are difficult to explain biologically. For example, Sjoberg et al (2005) reported interactions between 5-HTTLPR genotype and various adversity measures on risk of depression, but the interaction effects observed were in opposite directions in men and women. Although gender-specific effects are compatible with some observations from animal models, opposite effects of genetic modification of stress on depression risk between genders seems biologically less plausible.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Summary of studies examining the relationship between serotonin transporter (5-HTT) genotype, stressful life events and depression
 

In this issue Wilhelm et al report an interaction between genotype and stressful life events on risk of depression, with increased risk present in ‘s/s and ‘s/l’ but not ‘l/l’ phenotypes (Wilhelm et al, 2006, this issue). Adverse events appear to protect against depression in the ‘l/l’ group, although it is not clear whether the confidence intervals here are compatible with a null effect. Interestingly, a similar trend is observed in other studies that have reported an interaction, although an opposite effect of adversity on depression risk across genotypes seems biologically unlikely.


   SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS
 5-HTT, STRESSFUL LIFE EVENTS...
 SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
 EVIDENCE AGAINST
 WEIGHING UP THE EVIDENCE
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
In rhesus macaques interactions between rearing experience and rh5-HTTLPR (analogous to the human polymorphism) have been described for a number of potential depression-related outcomes (Barr et al, 2003). These findings probably require further replication, and lack of a clear pattern in the interactions reported for adrenocorticotrophic hormone and cortisol response to stress complicates interpretation of some results. Nevertheless, these studies provide a fascinating insight into possible advances to be gained from future research in this field. Other support for effect modification of stress by 5-HTT genotype comes from neuroimaging studies, where amygdala hyperreactivity in response to fearful stimuli has been reported in individuals with ‘s’ alleles compared with ‘l/l’ homozygous individuals in a number of studies (for example, see Hariri et al, 2005).


   EVIDENCE AGAINST
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS
 5-HTT, STRESSFUL LIFE EVENTS...
 SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
 EVIDENCE AGAINST
 WEIGHING UP THE EVIDENCE
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Surtees et al (2005), in the largest and most high-powered study to date examining this relationship, found no evidence of an interaction between genotype and adverse experiences in childhood or adulthood on risk of depression. In men, an interaction was observed for childhood adversity, but this was in the opposite direction to that reported by Caspi et al (2003). Another study, by Gillespie et al (2005), also failed to find evidence of interaction. Moreover, a non-significant trend for increased depression in ‘l/l’ homozygous individuals who had experienced more stressful life events was again in the opposite direction to the findings reported by Caspi and colleagues.


   WEIGHING UP THE EVIDENCE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS
 5-HTT, STRESSFUL LIFE EVENTS...
 SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
 EVIDENCE AGAINST
 WEIGHING UP THE EVIDENCE
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Although the studies to date have examined different depression and environmental stress measures, and employed different study designs and genetic models, most find evidence for a gene–environment interaction from both multiplicative as well as linear statistical models. However, the two largest studies to date find no evidence to support such an interaction, although issues regarding study design as well as temporal sequence and validity of measures are also important to consider when summarising findings across studies. Nevertheless, studies of interactions tend to be relatively low-powered, and as initial findings tend, on average, to be overestimates of true effect sizes, larger samples than those used in the original study are usually required for replication. Given that there is evidence of interaction from a number of studies with fairly small sample sizes, but no small negative studies, as can be seen in Table 1, it seems likely that publication bias is occurring, making interpretation of the evidence more problematic.


   FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS
 5-HTT, STRESSFUL LIFE EVENTS...
 SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
 EVIDENCE AGAINST
 WEIGHING UP THE EVIDENCE
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
In view of the above we believe it is sensible to be cautious in the interpretation of results from these studies. The consistency of findings from animal studies with these epidemiological observations suggests that the effects of stressful events might indeed be mediated by 5-HTTLPR genotype. If this can be confirmed by further adequately powered and well-designed studies, this will provide an intriguing base for further exploration and dissection of pathological mechanisms underlying depression. Guidelines for the study of gene–environment interactions suggest useful strategies as to how future studies may best be approached (Moffitt et al, 2005). Studies such as those discussed here and those reporting evidence for gene–environment interaction in other psychiatric disorders (Caspi et al, 2002, 2005) have all focused on reasonably well-supported candidate genes and environmental factors. Independent effects for most of these exposures are already established, and it is not yet clear to what extent these sorts of findings will influence our understanding of pathophysiology.

Interestingly, for most of these studies, a clear effect of genotype was only observed after stratification by environmental exposure, and recent meta-analyses provide only weak evidence, if any, of association between 5-HTTLPR and depression (Levinson, 2005). Consequently, it has been suggested that genome-wide scans for novel genes might profitably be based upon affected and unaffected samples selected for known exposure to an environmental pathogen for the disorder (Moffitt et al, 2005). This has inherent attractions where robust effects of specific environmental effects have been demonstrated. However, there are limitations. First, the number of environmental pathogens that have been clearly implicated in psychiatric disorders is small; it seems unlikely that the majority of risk genes for psychiatric disorders will interact with these few well-established pathogens, and the scope of such studies will thus be limited. Second, the unit costs of studies that include measurements of environmental exposures of sufficient quality will be great. Even though there should be gains in power to detect genes interacting with the candidate environmental exposure, it is not clear whether these will outweigh the increased cost per sample compared with necessarily larger studies of cases unselected for environmental exposure, where the unit costs are much lower. Population-based longitudinal studies that have both DNA as well as detailed environmental exposure data throughout the life course are ideally placed for such studies, and greatly improve the economic case for genetic studies of environmentally stratified samples.

The study of how genetic and environmental exposures interact on risk of disease may be an essential element to understanding complex disorders. However, the study of interactions requires a more cautious approach than studies of main effects, and evidence for modification of the effects of stress on risk of depression by 5-HTTLPR genotype is not yet robust. Although heralding much promise, the extent to which this fascinating area of research will enhance our understanding of psychiatric disease remains to be seen.


   REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS
 5-HTT, STRESSFUL LIFE EVENTS...
 SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
 EVIDENCE AGAINST
 WEIGHING UP THE EVIDENCE
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Barr, C. S., Newman, T. K., Becker, M. L., et al (2003) The utility of the non-human primate; model for studying gene by environment interactions in behavioral research. Genes, Brain, and Behavior, 2, 336 –340.

Caspi, A., McClay, J., Moffitt, T. E., et al (2002) Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297, 851 –854.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Caspi, A., Sugden, K., Moffitt, T. E., et al (2003) Influence of life stress on depression: moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science, 301, 386 –389.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Cannon, M., et al (2005) Moderation of the effect of adolescent-onset cannabis use on adult psychosis by a functional polymorphism in the catechol-O-methyltransferase gene: longitudinal evidence of a gene x environment interaction. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1117 –1127.[CrossRef][Medline]

Clayton, D. & McKeigue, P. M. (2001) Epidemiological methods for studying genes and environmental factors in complex diseases. Lancet, 358, 1356 –1360.[CrossRef][Medline]

Eley, T. C., Sugden, K., Corsico, A., et al (2004) Gene–environment interaction analysis of serotonin system markers with adolescent depression. Molecular Psychiatry, 9, 908 –915.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gillespie, N. A., Whitfield, J. B., Williams, B., et al (2005) The relationship between stressful life events, the serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) genotype and major depression. Psychological Medicine, 35, 101 –111.[CrossRef][Medline]

Grabe, H. J., Lange, M., Wolff, B., et al (2005) Mental and physical distress is modulated by a polymorphism in the 5HT transporter gene interacting with social stressors and chronic disease burden. Molecular Psychiatry, 10, 220 –224.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hariri, A. R., Drabant, E. M., Munoz, K. E., et al (2005) A susceptibility gene for affective disorders and the response of the human amygdala. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 146 –152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kaufman, J., Yang, B. Z., Douglas-Palumberi, H., et al (2004) Social supports and serotonin transporter gene moderate depression in maltreated children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 101, 17316 –17321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kendler, K. S., Kuhn, J. W., Vittum, J., et al (2005) The interaction of stressful life events and a serotonin transporter polymorphism in the prediction of episodes of major depression: a replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 529 –535.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Levinson, D. F. (2005) The genetics of depression: a review. Biological Psychiatry, 18 November [epub ahead of print].

Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A. & Rutter, M. (2005) Strategy for investigating interactions between measured genes and measured environments. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 473 –481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sjoberg, R. L., Nilsson, K. W., Nordquist, N., et al (2005) Development of depression: sex and the interaction between environment and a promoter polymorphism of the serotonin transporter gene. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 9, 1 –7.[Medline]

Surtees, P. G., Wainwright, N. W., Willis-Owen, S. A., et al (2005) Social adversity, the serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) polymorphism and major depressive disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 8 September [epub ahead of print].

Wilhelm, K., Mitchell, P. B., Niven, H., et al (2006) Life events, first depression onset and the serotonin transporter gene. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, 210 –215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received for publication December 8, 2005. Revision received December 12, 2005. Accepted for publication December 12, 2005.


Related articles in BJP:

Highlights of this issue
SUKHWINDER S. SHERGILL
BJP 2006 188: 199-a9. [Full Text]  

Life events, first depression onset and the serotonin transporter gene
KAY WILHELM, PHILIP B. MITCHELL, HEATHER NIVEN, ADAM FINCH, LUCINDA WEDGWOOD, ANNA SCIMONE, IAN P. BLAIR, GORDON PARKER, and PETER R. SCHOFIELD
BJP 2006 188: 210-215. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

PETER TYRER
BJP 2006 188: 300. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch PsychiatryHome page
Reviews of Note
Journal Watch Psychiatry, June 21, 2006; 2006(621): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

5HTT genotype and its future in psychiatry
Sangeetha Chinnadurai
BJP Online, 23 Mar 2006 [Full text]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJP
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ZAMMIT, S.
Right arrow Articles by OWEN, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ZAMMIT, S.
Right arrow Articles by OWEN, M. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals