School of Psychiatry and Mood Disorders Unit, Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney
Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney
School of Psychiatry and Mood Disorders Unit, Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney
Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney and Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Correspondence: Associate Professor Kay Wilhelm, Consultation Liaison Psychiatry, Level 4, DeLacy Building, St Vincents Hospital, Victoria Street, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia. Tel:+61 28 3823433; fax: +61 28 382 3479, e-mail: kwilhelm{at}stvincents.com.au
Declaration of interest None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.
See editorial, pp.
199201, this
issue. ![]()
|
|
|---|
Aims To replicate a gene x environment interaction in a cohort with longitudinal data for life events, experience of depression, parental bonding and neuroticism.
Method At the 25-year follow-up, genomic DNA was obtained from 127 cohort members (mean age 48 years) to determine the genotype of the serotonin transporter gene-linked promoter region (5-HTTLPR). Associations were investigated between the 5-HTTLPR genotype, positive and adverse life events and the gene x environment interaction, and also between the 5-HTTLPR genotype and risk factors for depression.
Results No relationship was found between 5-HTTLPR genotype and either risk factors for depression or positive life events. Adverse life events had a significantly greater impact on the onset of depression for individuals with the s/s genotype.
Conclusions The 5-HTTLPR genotype is a significant predictor of onset of major depression following multiple adverse events. This is one of the more robust findings concerning specific biological risk factors for depression.
|
|
|---|
A longitudinal cohort study (Caspi et al, 2003) which tested this gene x environment interaction hypothesis reported that participants with the s/s genotype were more likely than those with the s/l or l/l genotypes to experience DSM major depression in the presence of increasing numbers of adverse life events.
We sought to replicate a gene x environment interaction in a cohort with individualised longitudinal data for life events and onset of major depression. We also examined data for a broad range of experience of depression and putative risk factors for depression, including parental bonding and neuroticism.
|
|
|---|
The age at onset and the frequency of major depression and anxiety disorders were also recorded at all follow-up intervals, using the Diagnostic Interval Schedule (DIS; Robins et al, 1981) in 1983 and 1988, and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI; Robins & Helzer, 1988) in 1993, 1998 and 2003. A diagnosis of lifetime major depression was made by employing an add-on strategy in which the lifetime history was compiled by adding on new episodes identified at each wave of follow-up, respecting the decision about the presence or absence of episodes that was made at the interview closest to the index episode (Wilhelm & Parker, 1994). At each wave of follow-up, any anxiety or depressive disorders that were identified were recorded on a life chart, which also documented the occurrence of any of a range of significant life events. Both positive events (e.g. having a child or being promoted) and adverse events (e.g. marital breakdown or death of a parent) were recorded. During the period 20022003, participants were shown their individual life charts, which included all of the material that had been collected during the course of the study. The aim was to verify the history of depression and/or anxiety disorders, the treatment history and the presence and type of positive and adverse life events pertaining to work, health, friends and family on the basis of data collected on a year-by-year basis at each 5-yearly interview. These charts were viewed before any consideration of the genetic study reported here.
By 2003, 149 of the original 165 participants remained in the study (8 had died, 2 could not be located, 2 were too ill to continue and 4 did not wish to be further involved in the study). Of these 149 individuals, 62 (42%) met the criteria for lifetime major depression, with a mean age at onset of 30.7 years (s.d.=8.2, range=1550 years). In total, 128 members of the cohort gave their informed consent for the collection of genetic material. Of the DNA samples, 91% (n=117) were obtained via blood and 9% were obtained via buccal swabs (for those individuals who did not wish to undergo phlebotomy). The genomic DNA was obtained and genotypes for the 5-HTT gene-linked promoter region were determined for 127 members of the cohort.
DNA extraction and genetic analysis
Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood using a standard salting-out
method (Miller et al,
1988). To extract genomic DNA from cheek swabs, buccal cells were
pelleted by centrifugation and digested overnight at 42°C in a 420-µl
volume containing 1 mg/ml proteinase K, 6 mmol/l TRIS-Cl pH 7.5, 6 mmol/l
ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), 3% sodium sarkosyl, 1.2 mol/l
guanidine hydrochloride and 0.5 mol/l ammonium acetate. DNA was purified from
the digest by standard chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation, and
was resuspended in distilled water. The 5-HTTLPR was amplified with the
following primers: forward 5'-TGCCGCTCTGAATGCCAG CAC-3', and
reverse 5'-GCGGGATTCTG GTGCCACCTA-3', to generate a 464-base pair
(bp) product for the 16-repeat (l) allele, and a 420-bp product for the
14-repeat (s) allele. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in
25-µl volumes containing Optiprime mastermix (Stratagene), Optibuffer I
(Stratagene), 400 mmol/l betaine, 160 mmol/l 7-deaza-2"deoxyguanosine
5"-triphosphate, 20 ng template DNA, 20 pmol for each primer, and 1 U of
AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems). Reactions included initial
denaturation at 94°C for 12 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94°C for 30
s, 65°C for 45 s, 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension of 10 min at
72°C. After electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels, products were visualised
under ultraviolet light.
Statistical methods
Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between
depression and the 5-HTTLPR genotype, adverse life events and the gene x
environment interaction, with gender included as a covariate. As the age of
cohort members was controlled for in the original sample selection procedures
(Wilhelm & Parker, 1989), it was not included as a covariate in the present analysis (depression=
ß0+ß1(gender)+ß2
(5-HTTLPR)+ß3 (number of adverse life
events)+ß4 (5-HTTLPR x number of adverse life
events)).
In the above model, ß0 is the intercept, ß1 is the gender coefficient (0=female, 1=male), ß2 is the 5-HTTLPR coefficient (0=s/s, 1=s/l, 2=l/l), ß3 is the coefficient for adverse life events (0=none, 1=1, 2=2, 3=3 or more) and ß4 is the interaction-effect coefficient, which is the product of the two variables (5-HTTLPR and adverse life events). Life events were examined over two time periods, namely 1 year and 5 years before the onset of depression. For participants who had no history of depression, the number of life events was calculated for the 1- and 5-year periods before the mean age of the first episode of major depression (30.6 years) in the sample of people with depression. Adverse and then positive life events were examined in separate regression models. Analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were used to analyse associations between the 5-HTTLPR genotype and the following: self-reported vulnerability factors (neuroticism, normal and trait depression, parental bonding); total number of lifetime adverse life events; and total number of positive life events. Genotype variations were treated as the independent variable. The dependent variables were baseline scores on the self-report measures (each scale being independently analysed), adverse life events and positive life events (each summed across the participants lifetime).
|
|
|---|
2=0.03 (2),
P=0.98). There was no gender difference in genotype frequencies
(
2=3.56 (2), P=0.17). Of the 127 cohort members, 53 (42%) met the criteria for lifetime major depression, with a mean age at onset of 30.6 years (s.d.=8.4, range=1550 years). Of those who had experienced at least one episode of major depression, 32% reported no adverse life events, 15% reported one, 28% reported two and 25% reported three or more adverse life events in the 5 years before their first episode of major depression. Of those with no history of major depression, 32% reported no adverse life events, 34% reported one, 22% reported two and 12% reported three or more adverse life events in the same period.
The results of the logistic regression analyses are shown in Table 1. When adverse life events were examined, a main effect of the 5-HTTLPR was not found. However, an interaction between the 5-HTTLPR and adverse life events was found to significantly predict the onset of major depression for the 5 years before depression onset. Specifically, the influence of adverse life events on the onset of major depression was significantly greater for individuals with the s/s genotype (Fig. 1). This interaction was not significant for the single year before depression onset (Fig. 2). Overall, adverse life events were found to be the strongest predictor of major depression.
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 1. Binary logistic regressions of gender, genotype, life events and gene x environment interaction on lifetime history of major depression for the 127 cohort members |
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide] |
Fig. 1 Effect of number of adverse life events during a 5-year period on mean
predicted probability of major depression., s/s; - - - -, s/l;
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide] |
Fig. 2 Effect of number of adverse life events during a 1-year period on mean
predicted probability of major depression., s/s; - - - -, s/l;
|
No significant differences were found when positive life events were examined in the equivalent time periods preceding the onset of major depression. Neither the 5-HTTLPR, positive life events nor their interaction predicted depression onset. Gender was not a significant covariate in the model for any of the regression analyses.
Table 2 lists the mean scores for neuroticism, normal and trait depression measures, parental bonding, and lifetime adverse and positive life events. No significant differences were found when data were analysed according to genotype.
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 2. Baseline self-report measures and total lifetime life events according to 5-HTTLPR genotype |
|
|
|---|
Characteristics of the sample
Our study utilised a relatively small group of individuals who were
homogeneous with regard to a number of socio-demographic variables (age,
socio-economic status, education and ethnicity)
(Wilhelm & Parker, 1989)
compared with the larger sample of 847 participants in the Dunedin birth
cohort that was investigated by Caspi et al
(2003). All members of the
group had received tertiary education, and we have previously reported low
rates of cigarette and alcohol consumption and a negligible forensic history
in this group (Wilhelm & Parker,
1993; Wilhelm et al,
1997). The total cohort and the smaller group which provided
genetic material have identical and relatively high rates of major depression
(42%). We have previously argued that these high rates are related to the
following: the serial data collection method that was employed, which captures
single episodes or less severe episodes that had not attracted clinical
services, or which could have been overlooked or forgotten later; and the lack
of antisocial behaviour, substance misuse and dependence that may serve as
depressive equivalents in other samples (Wilhelm & Parker,
1989,
1993,
1994;
Wilhelm et al, 1997).
The argument that longitudinal studies with multiple points of data collection
yield higher rates of recall of episodes is reinforced by the findings of
another longitudinal study (Wells &
Horwood, 2004), which reported rates of 37% for DSM major
depression among young people assessed at yearly intervals from the age of 14
to 21 years. However, at 25 years of age, the same participants commonly
failed to recall episodes and key symptoms of lifetime major depression.
Similarly, 40% of respondents who reported a lifetime history of depressive
episodes at baseline in another longitudinal survey
(Thompson et al,
2004) failed to do so at a 13-year follow-up.
Life events and depression onset
The association between adverse life events and onset of major depression
is well established in the literature
(Kendler et al,
1999). In our study, variations in the 5-HTTLPR did not
independently predict the onset of major depression, but its interaction with
adverse life events was significant for the 5-year period. Although Caspi and
colleagues did not report on the relationship between the 5-HTTLPR genotype
and the number of life events experienced within the 12-month period before
depression onset, we also examined this time period as being potentially most
directly related to the onset of major depression. We found a strong main
effect, suggesting that the recent experience (within the last 12 months) of
adverse life events predicts depression onset. However, we found no evidence
of a significant interaction between the 5-HTTLPR genotype and adverse life
events. This may be because of the time frame, which did not allow for a
sufficient range of life events. Therefore, we used a single dichotomous
distinction (i.e. no adverse life events v. one or more adverse life
events) between cohort members experiences within the 12-month period.
The small sample size also limited the statistical power, and in this respect
a larger sample might reveal the expected gene x environment interaction
for the shorter time period leading up to the first depressive episode. As
positive life events may increase emotional responsiveness, we also examined
the effect of positive life events on onset of major depression. Positive life
events were not found to exert a depressogenic effect, and instead we found a
trend in the opposite direction. In a larger sample, positive life events may
exert a protective effect.
Genetic and psychological risk factors for major depression
About 50% of the variation in neuroticism has been attributed to genetics
(Loehlin, 1992). Neuroticism
is the most consistent risk factor for the onset and relapse of major
depression (Eccleston & Scott,
1991; Wilhelm et al,
1999), and has been shown to interact with adverse environmental
factors in the aetiology of major depression, such that higher neuroticism
infers greater sensitivity to the depressogenic effects of adverse life events
(Kendler et al,
2004). Yet the search for candidate genes has yielded conflicting
results (Schinka et al,
2004). A polymorphic variation in the 5-HTTLPR was found to be
associated with anxiety-related personality traits
(Lesch et al, 1996).
However, subsequent studies have come to conflicting conclusions
(Jorm et al, 1998;
Deary et al, 1999;
Greenberg et al,
2000).
Consistent with previous reports (e.g. Lesch et al, 1996), we postulated that individuals with the s/s genotype are more temperamentally sensitive, and as a result may report more life events, higher neuroticism as well as increased trait and normal depression scores, and a higher level of parental overprotection. We have previously reported that cohort members who had experienced repeated episodes of major depression had lower scores for maternal and paternal care and higher scores for trait depression and maternal overprotection recorded at baseline in 1978 (Wilhelm et al, 1999). We have also reported that women have consistently higher scores than men for neuroticism on the Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI) (Wilhelm et al, 1999) and normal depression (Wilhelm et al, 1998), both of which have been associated with higher rates of major depression (Parker et al, 1998; Wilhelm et al, 1999). However, none of these factors appeared to be associated with the 5-HTTLPR genotype. There was also no evidence of differential reporting of positive or adverse life events by individuals with the s/s, s/l or l/l genotypes.
Although individuals with the s/s genotype have a greater probability of experiencing onset of depression with increasing numbers of adverse life events, the trend for those with the l/l genotype is, if anything, in the opposite direction (Fig. 1). The same trend is noticeable in the earlier study (Caspi et al, 2003), and may be a chance finding. There is no evidence that people with the l/l genotype report fewer adverse life events, and we speculate that they may be less reactive to environmental cues but possibly employ coping styles that modulate increasing levels of stress. Although interest has been focused on the short allele, it would be beneficial also to consider the stress-related experience of people with the long allele.
Previous attempts to replicate earlier findings
Four recent studies have also aimed to replicate the results obtained by
Caspi and colleagues. First, in a negative replication, Gillespie et
al (2004) cited factors
such as the wide age range (1978 years) of their sample and the
measurement of life events at a single time point for a 12-month period as
possible factors contributing to a reduction in power to detect interactions
between life events and onset of major depression. For these reasons, too,
their methodology was less likely to have captured the first onset of major
depression than the method that we used.
In the second study, which utilised an adolescent sample, Eley et al, (2004) used a depression symptom measure as the outcome variable, and reported an interaction between the 5-HTTLPR and a composite measure of environmental risk that reached the level of significance for female but not for male participants. In the third study, Grabe et al (2005) analysed the genotype by grouping individuals with s/s and s/l genotypes together, and comparing their findings for these individuals with those for the l/l genotype. They found an interaction between the 5-HTTLPR and life stressors (unemployment and number of chronic diseases). However, this also only reached the level of significance in women.
These two partial replications (Eley et al, 2004; Grabe et al, 2005) adopted very different methodologies to our study, as both were cross-sectional and used symptom rating scales as outcome measures. Both studies also used different environmental stressors. Rather than summing reported life events, they used either a composite of various stressors (Eley et al, 2004) or unemployment and number of diseases (Grabe et al, 2005). These may constitute chronic stressors which could reduce the impact of the postulated interaction and may not be directly comparable with the more acute adverse events that were used by Caspis group (Caspi et al, 2003) and in our study. Furthermore, cross-sectional cross-sectional designs do not allow clear identification of a causal pathway between life events and depression onset. Our use of life charts and a longitudinal design allowed more accurate identification of the onset of first episodes and preceding life events for each individual.
In a positive replication, Kaufman et al (2004) studied children with a history of maltreatment and found that those with the s/s allele reported significantly more depressive symptoms than those with the s/l or l/l allele. There were no differences in the number of depressive symptoms between genotypes among controls (without a history of maltreatment). This study used depressive symptoms rather than major depression, and draws attention to the moderating role of social support in at-risk individuals.
Gillespie et al (2004) noted the problems of looking for a gene x environment interaction in an older population, but there may also be problems with an adolescent population such as that used by Eley et al (2004). The mean age of depression onset for both men and women is in the midto late twenties (Weissman et al, 1996), and gender differences in rates start to emerge between the ages of 15 and 18 years (Hankin et al, 1998). Thus a sample of adolescents with an age range of 1219 years may prematurely demarcate the group with depression, some of whom may not as yet have declared themselves. This may account both for the non-significant trend for the group as a whole (Eley et al, 2004) and for the significant gene x environment interaction in female participants. The findings of Kaufman et al (2004) suggest that the gene x environment interaction is apparent even in childhood and adolescence when experience of environmental adversity varies considerably within the sample.
Although the positive studies (Caspi et al, 2003; Eley et al, 2004; Kaufman et al, 2004; Grabe et al, 2005) differ from the present one in methodology, they are consistent with it in that they all demonstrate that the 5-HTTLPR genotype is a significant factor determining the likelihood of experiencing depression after exposure to multiple adverse life events.
Implications
Both proximal factors (e.g. adverse life events) and distal factors (e.g.
dysfunctional parenting, childhood maltreatment) can be involved in any
putative gene x environment interaction in the onset of depression
(Farmer et al, 2005).
The consistency of the findings of the present study with regard to proximal
events raises the possibility of preventive interventions that would have
potentially major clinical significance. The gene x environment
interaction reported in this paper is modest, and it would be premature to
apply this finding to the clinical arena, but it is none the less vital to
seriously consider the ethical and policy ramifications of such genetic
research (Farmer & Owen,
1996; Rutter & Plomin,
1997; Morley et al,
2004). Future research efforts may be directed towards determining
whether the identification of at-risk genotypes can inform
treatment decisions concerning psychological or pharmacological therapies to
prevent or ameliorate the eventual onset of depression. In addition, there is
the equally important question of what can be learned from studying
at-risk individuals who are resilient to the effects of adverse
life events (Farmer et al,
2005).
|
|
|---|
LIMITATIONS
|
|
|---|
This study was supported by NH & MRC Program Grants 222708, 230802 and 157209 and a New South Wales Centre for Health Infrastructure Grant.
|
|
|---|
Related articles in BJP:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. M. Goodyer, A. Bacon, M. Ban, T. Croudace, and J. Herbert Serotonin transporter genotype, morning cortisol and subsequent depression in adolescents The British Journal of Psychiatry, July 1, 2009; 195(1): 39 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Risch, R. Herrell, T. Lehner, K.-Y. Liang, L. Eaves, J. Hoh, A. Griem, M. Kovacs, J. Ott, and K. R. Merikangas Interaction Between the Serotonin Transporter Gene (5-HTTLPR), Stressful Life Events, and Risk of Depression: A Meta-analysis JAMA, June 17, 2009; 301(23): 2462 - 2471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wilhelm, B. Meiser, P. B. Mitchell, A. W. Finch, J. E. Siegel, G. Parker, and P. R. Schofield Issues concerning feedback about genetic testing and risk of depression The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2009; 194(5): 404 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sanjuan, R. Martin-Santos, L. Garcia-Esteve, J. M. Carot, R. Guillamat, A. Gutierrez-Zotes, I. Gornemann, F. Canellas, E. Baca-Garcia, M. Jover, et al. Mood changes after delivery: role of the serotonin transporter gene The British Journal of Psychiatry, November 1, 2008; 193(5): 383 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Praschak-Rieder, M. Willeit, A. A. Wilson, S. Houle, and J. H. Meyer Seasonal Variation in Human Brain Serotonin Transporter Binding Arch Gen Psychiatry, September 1, 2008; 65(9): 1072 - 1078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Bradley, E. B. Binder, M. P. Epstein, Y. Tang, H. P. Nair, W. Liu, C. F. Gillespie, T. Berg, M. Evces, D. J. Newport, et al. Influence of Child Abuse on Adult Depression: Moderation by the Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Gene Arch Gen Psychiatry, February 1, 2008; 65(2): 190 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Bibliography for Major Depressive Disorder and Suicide Focus, January 1, 2008; 6(1): 58 - 62. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tyrer From the Editor's desk The British Journal of Psychiatry, December 1, 2007; 191(6): 578 - 578. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Kilpatrick, K. C. Koenen, K. J. Ruggiero, R. Acierno, S. Galea, H. S. Resnick, J. Roitzsch, J. Boyle, and J. Gelernter The Serotonin Transporter Genotype and Social Support and Moderation of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Depression in Hurricane-Exposed Adults Am J Psychiatry, November 1, 2007; 164(11): 1693 - 1699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Otte, J. McCaffery, S. Ali, and M. A. Whooley Association of a Serotonin Transporter Polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) With Depression, Perceived Stress, and Norepinephrine in Patients With Coronary Disease: The Heart and Soul Study Am J Psychiatry, September 1, 2007; 164(9): 1379 - 1384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wilhelm, J. E. Siegel, A. W. Finch, D. Hadzi-Pavlovic, P. B. Mitchell, G. Parker, and P. R. Schofield The Long and the Short of It: Associations Between 5-HTT Genotypes and Coping With Stress Psychosom Med, September 1, 2007; 69(7): 614 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Parker Is depression overdiagnosed? Yes BMJ, August 18, 2007; 335(7615): 328 - 328. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Crandall Suicide: scientific overview and relevance for trauma care providers Trauma, July 1, 2007; 9(3): 213 - 220. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Firk and C. R. Markus Review: Serotonin by stress interaction: a susceptibility factor for the development of depression? J Psychopharmacol, July 1, 2007; 21(5): 538 - 544. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tyrer The British Journal of Psychiatry, February 1, 2007; 190(2): 188 - 188. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Mrazek Psychiatric Pharmacogenomics Focus, August 1, 2006; 4(3): 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. ZAMMIT and M. J. OWEN Stressful life events, 5-HTT genotype and risk of depression The British Journal of Psychiatry, March 1, 2006; 188(3): 199 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||