Department of Psychiatry and Alimentary Pharmabiotic Centre, University College Cork, Ireland
Correspondence: Professor Ted Dinan, Department of Psychiatry, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland. Tel: +353 21 4920119; e-mail: t.dinan{at}ucc.ie
Declaration of interest T.G.D. has lectured at meetings sponsored by or acted as an advisor to all companies who market a branded SSRI.
|
|
|---|
Aims To examine C-reactive protein levels in depression and to determine the impact of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy.
Method Atwo-part study. In study 1, which used a between-subjects design, C-reactive protein was measured in 32 patients (20 currently depressed, 12 euthymic) with a history of DSMIV major depression, all of whom were treated with an SSRI, and in a healthy comparison group (n=20). Study 2 employed a within-subject design: C-reactive protein was measured in 20 patients with major depression both before and after SSRI treatment.
Results In study 1, C-reactive protein levels did not differ between the group with depressive disorder (either currently depressed or euthymic) treated with SSRIs and the healthy group.In study 2 the protein levels dropped significantly following treatment with antidepressant medication.
Conclusions Following SSRI treatment for major depression there is a significant drop in C-reactive protein concentrations whether or not the depression resolves. These findings indicate that antidepress-ants induce an anti-inflammatory response independent of antidepressant action.
|
|
|---|
Major depression has been shown to be associated with activation of the inflammatory response. These changes include increased numbers of peripheral leucocytes, both monocytes and neutrophils (Maes, 1999). Positive acute-phase proteins (including C-reactive protein) are increased (Sluzewska et al, 1996; Berk et al, 1997; Maes, 1999; Tuglu et al, 2003), whereas negative acute-phase proteins (e.g. albumin) are decreased (Maes, 1999). This acute-phase response is an integral part of the inflammatory response and its purpose is to enable protein mobilisation, which serves to limit tissue damage and stimulate repair (Kushner, 1982).
Levels of C-reactive protein have been used for monitoring many diseases for decades. With the advent of highly sensitivite tests it has become possible to measure levels of this protein that lie within the normal range (Rifai et al, 1999). Using these high-sensitivity kits, C-reactive protein may be useful in predicting cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease (Haverkate et al, 1997; Ridker et al, 2000). Depressed individuals have been shown to be at increased risk of developing angina and myocardial infarction compared with their non-depressed counterparts (Dinan, 1999; Rozanski et al, 1999). When traditional risk factors for coronary heart disease are adjusted for, depressed individuals have a risk double that of the non-depressed population (Rozanski et al, 1999). There is some evidence that risk of coronary heart disease is associated with a doseresponse effect, with higher risk of the disorder in individuals with greater exposure to depression (Penninx et al, 2001). The Amsterdam Longitudinal Ageing study reported a relative risk of cardiac mortality of 1.6 associated with depressive symptoms. However, this cardiac mortality relative risk increased to 3.8 for those who were clinically depressed (Penninx et al, 2001). The link between depression and coronary heart disease may be mediated through inflammation. Atherosclerosis is preceded by inflammation with increased production of acute-phase proteins, including C-reactive protein and pro-inflammatory cytokines (Libby et al, 2002; Lesperance et al, 2004). It seems reasonable to assume that depression increases the risk of coronary heart disease through its pro-inflammatory biology.
The purpose of our study was to examine C-reactive protein levels in depression and to determine the impact of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy.
|
|
|---|
Study 2 employed a within-subject design. Twenty women were recruited with a mean age of 37.9 years (range 2356). All were diagnosed with DSMIV major depression with melancholic features and had an HRSD score greater than 17. They had been medication-free for at least 6 weeks at the time of recruitment. Following baseline investigation they were treated for 3 weeks with either fluoxetine (20 mg), paroxetine (20 mg) or sertraline (50 mg). The choice of antidepressant was made by the treating clinician.
All participants had a full physical examination to rule out significant physical illness, including acute or chronic infections and inflammatory or immune disorders; individuals were excluded if they had any endocrine, immune or metabolic disorder such as an autoimmune disorder, inflammatory bowel disease or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Similarly, participants who in the past 2 weeks had had an allergic, infectious or inflammatory response were excluded from the study. Laboratory testing was performed on the whole sample, including full blood count and renal and liver profile. Patients with comorbid axis I disorders, including substance misuse, were excluded.
Procedure
Participants provided a 4 ml sample of blood, collected in a serum clot
activator container between 09.00 h and 11.00 h. Severity of depression was
assessed using the 17-item version of the HRSD
(Hamilton, 1960) on the morning
of blood sampling. The levels of C-reactive protein were measured using an
immunoturbidimetric assay by Olympus
(http://www.olympus-global.com).
This system was able to detect concentrations of this protein as low as 1.57
mg/l.
Data analysis
A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine group
differences between both patient groups and the control group in study 1. In
the within-subject study, paired t-tests and Pearsons product
moment correlation coefficients were used as appropriate. All results are
expressed as mean (s.e.m.) and the data were analysed by GraphPad Prism,
version 4.0 for Windows (Graph Pad Software, San Diego, California, USA;
http://www.graphpad.com).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide] |
Fig. 1 Levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with recurrent depression
and in healthy controls.
|
Study 2
Following 3 weeks of treatment with an SSRI, 2 patients had an HRSD score
greater than 17, and 2 were clinically euthymic with an HRSD score below 7
(Fig. 2). Levels of C-reactive
protein dropped significantly following treatment
(Fig. 3): the pre-treatment
level was 12.0 mg/l (s.e.m.= 0.95) and the level following treatment was 8.0
mg/l (s.e.m.=0.68) (t=4.88, d.f.=18, P<0.0001). Two
patients had an increase in HRSD score post-treatment but in both cases their
level of C-reactive protein dropped. There was no relationship between protein
level and HRSD score or between change in protein level and change in HRSD
score.
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide] |
Fig. 2 Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) scores at baseline and
following treatment.
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide] |
Fig. 3 Levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) before and after treatment with a
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
|
|
|
|---|
Implications
The findings suggest that the inflammatory response seen in depression may
not have a role in the pathophysiology of depression since it is possible to
decrease the inflammatory response without any improvement in the clinical
state. However, the inflammatory response may have significant implications
for peripheral disorders such as coronary heart disease.
Elevation of C-reactive protein
To further clarify the issue we conducted a study using a within-subject
design following the same group of patients with major depression before and
after antidepressant treatment. Pre-treatment C-reactive protein
concentrations were higher than those seen following treatment. We did not
have a healthy control group for this phase, so it is not possible to say with
certainty that the baseline levels were elevated in comparison with normal;
however, it seems likely that this was the case. In an earlier study Sluzewska
et al (1996) measured
C-reactive protein in 49 in-patients with major depression, all of whom had
been drug-free for at least 10 days. A statistically significant difference in
protein concentration was found in the patients. Berk et al
(1997) also measured C-reactive
protein prior to initiation of treatment in patients with major depression,
and found it to be elevated in the patients relative to healthy participants.
In that study increased levels of C-reactive protein were found to correlate
with IL-6 concentrations, consistent with the hypothesis that major depression
is associated with activation of the immune response. However, in our study 2,
when Creactive protein was measured following 3 weeks of antidepressant
treatment, levels of this protein had significantly reduced. This finding was
independent of response to antidepressant therapy. The data are in keeping
with our first study, which showed that the patients with a current episode of
major depression who continued on antidepressant medication had C-reactive
protein levels comparable with those in healthy participants and in patients
with recurrent depressive disorder who were euthymic at the time of the
study.
Rothermundt et al (2001) also found that C-reactive protein levels following 2 weeks and 4 weeks of treatment did not differ significantly from those in healthy participants, providing further evidence for the anti-inflammatory potential of antidepressants. Hornig et al (1998) measured C-reactive protein concentrations in unipolar depression and bipolar affective disorder; in their study a significant reduction in the number of participants with levels greater than 6 mg/l was found following lithium monotherapy.
Heart disease and C-reactive protein
Minor elevations of C-reactive protein are predictive of cardiovascular
events in people with coronary heart disease
(Haverkate et al,
1997). In a large prospective cohort study from Reykjavik
involving 2459 patients and 3969 matched controls, a single measurement of
C-reactive protein was studied in relation to the 20-year incidence of
coronary heart disease. Patients with a concentration greater than 2 mg/l had
a relative risk of coronary heart disease of 1.92 compared with patients with
levels of the protein in the bottom third
(Danesh et al, 2004).
The precise mechanism underlying C-reactive protein levels and adverse
outcomes is not clear. It has been suggested that statins, which are commonly
used to lower cholesterol levels, may reduce systemic inflammation and
therefore reduce C-reactive protein by decreasing levels of atherogenic
lipoproteins. However, Nissen et al
(2005) have demonstrated that
the reduced rate of progression of atherosclerosis is significantly related to
greater reduction in levels of atherogenic lipoproteins and independently
related to reductions in C-reactive protein.
Conclusions
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor therapy for major depression results
in a reduction in C-reactive protein levels. This occurs irrespective of
clinical outcome. Our findings suggest that these drugs may have benefit as
anti-inflammatory agents even in people without depression who have
inflammatory conditions.
|
|
|---|
LIMITATIONS
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related articles in BJP:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Frasure-Smith and F. Lesperance Depression and cardiac risk: present status and future directions Heart, February 1, 2010; 96(3): 173 - 176. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Kendall-Tackett Inflammation, Cardiovascular Disease, and Metabolic Syndrome as Sequelae of Violence Against Women: The Role of Depression, Hostility, and Sleep Disturbance Trauma Violence Abuse, April 1, 2007; 8(2): 117 - 126. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Are Antidepressants Anti-Inflammatory Agents? Journal Watch Psychiatry, June 21, 2006; 2006(621): 8 - 8. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||