HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Scott, J. Articles by Hayhurst, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Scott, J. Articles by Hayhurst, H.

Cognitive–behavioural therapy for bipolar disorder

Department of Psychological Medicine, PO Box 96, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.

E. Paykel

Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK

R. Morriss

Department of Psychiatry, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, UK

R. Bentall

Department of Psychology, University of Manchester, UK

P. Kinderman

Department of Clinical Psychology, University Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK

T. Johnson

Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UK

R. Abbott and H. Hayhurst

Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK

Correspondence: E-mail: j.scott{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk

EDITED BY KIRIAKOS XENITIDIS and COLIN CAMPBELL

Dr Lam (2006) comments on our study (Scott et al, 2006a), the largest randomised controlled trial (RCT) of psychological treatment for bipolar disorder conducted so far. We respond as follows.

1. Dr Lam seems to misinterpret the nature and purpose of pragmatic trials. It is not a matter, as he suggests, simply of appropriate outcome measures, which should be a feature of all trials. Pragmatic trials are intended to test therapies in the practical circumstances of everyday clinical settings, using large multicentre samples (Hotopf et al, 1999). Most previous trials of therapies for bipolar disorders were single-centre efficacy studies designed to try out new interventions in specialist services or where the originator worked.
   
2. Dr Lam comments on the number of cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) sessions received. We believe that 20 sessions with 2 boosters is as many as is practical in most National Health Service (NHS) settings. That patients attended about 14 of the sessions offered is frustrating but reflects clinical reality and is remarkably similar to the attendance achieved in Dr Lam’s own study (Lam et al, 2003: average 13.9 sessions, s.d.=5.5).
   
3. Our analysis strategy was determined before inspection of the data under the scrutiny of a trial steering committee appointed by the Medical Research Council. Dr Lam confounds several issues and recommends an actuarial analysis that is fundamentally incorrect in the context of an RCT (ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline, 1999). In an intention-to-treat analysis, the date of randomisation determines the start of the clock and everyone who is randomised is analysed; it is wrong to delay the inclusion of any participant in the analysis until they are asymptomatic. We also reported in the text on the issue he raised, namely that there was no difference in time to next bipolar episode or mean severity of symptoms in the sample who were in acute bipolar episode at baseline, not in acute bipolar episode at baseline or the whole sample.
   
4. Dr Lam suggests it was inappropriate to include in our study individuals who were in a current episode or not on mood stabilisers. However, given that RCTs of therapy for mental disorders are usually undertaken with participants who are currently symptomatic, we believe it is important and informative to explore the potential effects of therapies commenced in the acute phase of bipolar disorder. Furthermore, in Judd et al’s (2002) 12-year follow-up it was shown that individuals with bipolar disorder spend 50% of their time with syndromal or sub-syndromal symptoms of mood disorder, predominantly depression. Not receiving or not adhering to recognised mood stabilisers is a similar well-documented issue in 20–50% of individuals with bipolar disorders (Scott & Colom, 2005). Our sample thus reflects the realities of clinical practice.
   
5. It is standard practice in RCTs to control for design variables and also to pursue additional analyses that control for potential confounders (Schulz & Grimes, 2005). None of our analyses failed to converge, a common consequence of multi-collinearity.
   
6. Dr Lam points out that a median split of a continuous variable can lose information. In fact, this was the reason why we looked for a trend across four groups as shown in Fig. 4 (p. 318).
   

Previous studies of psychological therapies have mostly involved more selected populations at relatively lower risk of relapse. In those circumstances CBT appears beneficial. Our study used a mixed patient sample; many were high-risk or currently symptomatic. We designed the trial in this way to address an issue not explored so far in any other psychological therapy study, namely whether the treatment would be effective in all patients who might be considered for it. Patients were only excluded if participation was unfeasible or unethical.

Our findings indicate that 22 sessions of CBT may not be effective for most people seen in NHS general adult psychiatry settings. In our lower-risk subgroup, similar in characteristics to Dr Lam’s sample (Lam et al, 2003), CBT may be very helpful. The clinical implications are that for a stable, lower-risk population, early in their history of bipolar recurrences, CBT should be considered as an adjunctive treatment option to further enhance their outcome. For high-risk, complex cases, other forms of therapy should be considered, such as those targeted at medication adherence or relapse prevention, before considering CBT. These recommendations are consistent with the results from published meta-analyses and other findings on psychological therapies in bipolar disorders (Scott & Colom, 2005; Scott et al, 2006b).

REFERENCES

Hotopf, M., Churchill, R. & Lewis, G. (1999) Pragmatic randomised controlled trials in psychiatry. British Journal of Psychiatry, 175, 217 –223.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Judd, L. L., Akiskal, H. S., Schlettler, P. J., et al (2002) The long-term natural history of the weekly symptomatic status of bipolar 1 disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 530 –537.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline (1999) Statistical principles for clinical trials Statistics in Medicine, 18, 1905 –1942.[Medline]

Lam, D., Watkins, E., Hayward, P., et al (2003) A randomized controlled trial of cognitive therapy of relapse prevention for bipolar disorder: outcome of the first year. Archives General Psychiatry, 60, 145 –152.

Lam, D. (2006) What can we conclude from studies on psychotherapy in bipolar disorder? Invited commentary on: Cognitive–behavioural therapy for severe and recurrent bipolar disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, 321 –322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schulz, K. F. & Grimes, D. A. (2005) Multiplicity in randomised trials II: subgroup and interim analyses. Lancet, 365, 1657 –1661.[CrossRef][Medline]

Scott, J. & Colom, F. (2005) Psychosocial treatments for bipolar disorders. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 28, 371 –384.[CrossRef][Medline]

Scott, J., Paykel, E., Morriss, R., et al (2006a) Cognitive–behavioural therapy for severe and recurrent bipolar disorders. Randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, 313 –320.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Scott, J., Colom, F. & Vieta, E. (2006b) A meta-analysis of adjunctive psychological therapies compared to usual psychiatric treatment for bipolar disorders. International Journal of Neuropsychiatry, in press.

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Scott, J. Articles by Hayhurst, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Scott, J. Articles by Hayhurst, H.