The British Journal of Psychiatry (2006) 188: 494. doi: 10.1192/bjp.188.5.494-a
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dom, G.
Right arrow Articles by van den Brink, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dom, G.
Right arrow Articles by van den Brink, W.

Correspondence

Authors’ reply

G. Dom

Psychiatric Centre Alexian Brothers, Provinciesteenweg 408, 2530 Boechout, Belgium.

B. Sabbe and W. Hulstijn

Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium

W. van den Brink

Academic Medical Centre and Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Correspondence: E-mail: geert.dom{at}fracarita.org

EDITED BY KIRIAKOS XENITIDIS and COLIN CAMPBELL

The findings of Bowden-Jones et al (2005) add to the accumulating evidence that impairments on decision-making tasks are an important characteristic of people with substance use and possibly other addictive disorders. The finding that those alcohol-dependent people that performed poorly on behavioural tasks were at higher risk of relapse is a nice demonstration of the ‘myopia’ for the future that is reflected by poor task performance. This is in line with other recent studies, including that of Goudriaan et al (2006), which showed that relapse among gamblers was associated with behavioural (but not self-reported) measures of impulsivity. Furthermore, Paulus et al (2005) reported that methamphetamine-dependent people with low prefrontal activation during a decision-making task relapsed significantly more frequently than those with greater activation. Together with the results of Bowden-Jones et al (2005), these findings represent an important new line of investigation.

Identification of distinctive neurobehavioural characteristics may allow detection of those people with addictions that are more vulnerable to relapse. Neurobehavioural (endophenotypic) characteristics may prove to be better for the identification of high-risk patients than traditional clinical (phenotypical) variables.

REFERENCES

  1. Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., de Beurs, E., et al (2006) Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: a comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls. Addiction, 101, 534 –547.[Medline]
  2. Paulus, M. P., Tapert, S. F. & Schuckit, M. A. (2005) Neural activation patterns of methamphetamine-dependent subjects during decision making predict relapse. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 761 –768.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dom, G.
Right arrow Articles by van den Brink, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dom, G.
Right arrow Articles by van den Brink, W.