|
|
|||||||||||
Department of Mental Health Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London
Research and Development Department, Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, St Anns Hospital, London
Department of Mental Health Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK
Correspondence: Michael King, PhD, Department of Mental Health Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK. E-mail: m.king{at}medsch.ucl.ac.uk
Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.
|
|
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aims To examine the association between poorly planned migration and depression in Irish-born people living in London.
Method A sample of 360 Irish-born people was recruited from 11 general practices into a casecontrol study. Participants were interviewed using standardised measures, including the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). We calculated the odds ratio for any association between depression and eight questions on preparation for migration.
Results Poorly planned migration was associated with subsequent depression in Irish-born people living in London (OR=1.20, 95% CI1.061.35). The odds of depression were increased by a factor of 20% for each additional negative answer to eight questions on preparation for migration. Positive post-migration influences such as adequate social support protected some against depression.
Conclusions Depression in Irish-born people living in London is associated with poorly planned migration. However, this effect can be modified by experiences following migration.
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Working hypotheses
The primary hypothesis was that Irish-born people living in London who are
depressed are more likely than Irish-born controls to have undertaken an
unplanned migration. Secondary hypotheses were that pre-migration factors
(i.e. family history of depression, personal history of depression, childhood
trauma) and post-migration factors (i.e. level of social support,
unemployment, discrimination, acculturation, alcohol misuse, marital status
and level of education) will modify this relationship.
|
|
METHOD |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We asked all respondents who scored 11 or above on the depression section of the HADS, or who reported an episode of depression in the preceding 12 months, to participate in a face-to-face assessment in which we used the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck & Steer, 1984), a measure of severity for depression, to confirm the presence of depressive symptoms. A score of 14 or more on the BDI was taken as a threshold for defining caseness. However, individuals who reported receiving treatment for depression from their general practitioner or a counsellor in the preceding 12 months were also included in the case group, even if they scored below 14 on the BDI. These inclusion criteria were intended to embrace a broad range of people with depressive symptoms, rather than merely those with depressive disorders according to diagnostic criteria. We also invited Irish people who had no significant depressive symptoms, matched by age (5-year bands), gender and general practice, to participate.
Collection of data
After we had collected standard demographic information we assessed
acculturation (levels of cultural integration), using 10 questions adapted
from a previous survey (Curran,
2003) about attitudes to settlement in England or return to
Ireland. To assess discrimination we asked 10 questions adapted from a
previous survey of Irish migrants (Hickman
& Walter, 1997).
To assess preparation for migration, we asked eight questions that tapped the central components of this factor. These questions were derived from our review of the relevant literature, discussions with experts in the field and our own knowledge of migration. We asked whether respondents had: (1) discussed their migration with family members in Ireland; (2) obtained family agreement with their decision; (3) pre-arranged employment in England; (4) considered their length of stay; (5) a network of friends or family available upon arrival; (6) pre-arranged accommodation; (7) prepared to any extent for their migration; and (8) a principal reason for leaving Ireland (the questions are published as a data supplement to the online version of this paper).
We obtained data on potential influences on any association between migration and depression using standardised instruments. We used the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ; Bernstein & Fink, 1998) to enquire about abuse and neglect in childhood; the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT; Saunders et al, 1993); the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF12; Jenkinson et al, 1993) and the EuroQol (Brooks, 1996) to assess health-related quality of life; the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Social Support Survey (Sherbourne & Stewart, 1991); and the Royal Free Interview for Religious and Spiritual Beliefs (King et al, 1995) to assess change in religious belief/behaviour.
Statistical power
We estimated that for each exposure for which the expected frequency in the
group without depression was 20% or more, it was possible with 186
participants in each group to detect with 80% power and a 5% level of
significance an odds ratio of at least 2.0 for that exposure in the group with
depression. That is, when the factor was present (exposed) we could determine
whether the respondent was at least twice as likely to belong to the case
group as when the factor was not present (unexposed). Our initial target
therefore consisted of 186 patients in each group.
Data analysis
We used logistic regression and conditional logistic regression analyses to
compare cases and controls. We evaluated the results by likelihood ratio tests
and presented them as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. We have
represented the unmatched analysis adjusting for the matching variables of age
and gender, as this provides greater power and flexibility
(Hennekens & Buring,
1987). Our primary analysis concerned the association between
preparation for migration and depression. In secondary analyses we explored
the role of both pre- and post-migration influences on depression separately.
We used a backward stepwise method of elimination with the level of
significance set at less than 0.10 for variable retention. Further exploratory
analysis was performed for each gender separately. We analysed the data using
Stata Version 7 for Windows.
|
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Preparation for migration
Preparation for migration was calculated as the sum of negative answers to
the eight questions about migration (see online data supplement). The
resulting total score had moderate internal consistency (Cronbachs
=0.58). On a scale of negative answers ranging from 0 to 8, the mean
score for the depression group was 3.4 (s.d.=1.83), compared with 2.9
(s.d.=1.6) for the control group.
Main findings
In our primary analysis, the odds ratio (adjusted for age and gender) for
depression associated with unplanned migration was 1.20 (95% CI
1.061.36). This means that the risk of depression increased by 20% with
each additional negative answer to the eight questions on preparation for
migration. The unadjusted result was almost identical (OR=1.20, 95% CI
1.061.35).
Influence of pre-migration factors
When we adjusted for pre-migration factors, the odds ratio failed to reach
significance (OR=1.09, 95% CI 0.941.26). However, a history of
depression in Ireland and childhood emotional abuse were potential
pre-migration predictors of current depression
(Table 3).
|
Influence of post-migration factors
When we adjusted for post-migration factors, the odds ratio again failed to
reach significance (OR=1.06, 95% CI 0.911.23). The post-migration
factors that were associated with depression were low level of social support,
unemployment, alcohol misuse and low level of educational attainment
(Table 3).
Gender differences
We observed consistent and substantial differences between men and women.
Table 1 shows that the men with
depression had higher levels of unemployment and lower levels of home
ownership, and were less likely to be married or to have children than the
women with depression. Table 2
shows that they also had significantly higher mean scores than the women in
their group on both the HADS (10.8 (s.d.=4.9) v. 8.9 (s.d.=4.8)) and
the BDI (21.5 (s.d.=10.5) v. 18.3 (s.d.=9.4))
(Table 2), but were no more
likely than the women to be receiving treatment.
Table 3 shows how these differences affect our main findings. For men, the odds ratio for depression associated with unplanned migration (adjusted for age) was 1.30 (95% CI 1.101.53), while that for women was 1.07 (95% CI 0.871.30). This finding for men also differed with age, the effect being more pronounced for younger men (below a median age of 56 years) (OR=1.33, 95% CI 1.081.64) than for older men (OR=1.27, 95% CI 0.971.66). The odds ratio for younger women was 1.27 (95% CI 0.941.70), and for older women it was 0.89 (95% CI 0.671.18).
The influence of other factors before and after migration
A history of depression in Ireland was a significant predictor for men, and
childhood emotional abuse was a significant predictor for women. In total, 40%
of respondents with depression reported experiencing some level of emotional
abuse and almost 50% reported some degree of neglect during their childhood in
Ireland (Table 4). After
adjustment for pre-migration risk factors, the odds ratio for depression
associated with poorly planned migration remained significant for men
(OR=1.27, 95% CI 1.041.54) but not for women
(Table 3). When adjusted for
post-migration risk factors, the odds ratios for depression associated with
poorly planned migration failed to reach significance for men or women
(Table 3).
|
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Strengths and limitations of the study
Validation of our method of identification of Irish-born participants
showed that only a small proportion of Irish people had been missed by the
distinctive first name/last name method. This approach has the advantage of
recruiting a wider and more representative population than convenience or
snowball sampling. The age profile of our respondents is similar to that
recorded in the UK 2001 census (Howes,
2004), and thus reflects the Irish population in London. Our
response rate of 46.8% after two mailings may be partly explained by the fact
that many people with Irish names were not Irish-born. However, it is also
possible that people with severe depression did not respond to the postal
questionnaire. Our eight questions on migration planning were not validated,
but this is a new hypothesis for which no validated instrument is available.
The questions were derived from the literature on migration and our own
extensive knowledge of this area of research. Although casecontrol
studies may be vulnerable to differential recall, the participants were
unaware of the main hypothesis of this study, so systematic differences in
recall between participants in each group will have been reduced to a minimum.
However, the possibility remains that people with depression may give more
negative accounts of their lives, including perceptions of discrimination.
Thus we cannot be certain whether the experiences of Irish people with
depression living in London were the cause or the effect of their
depression.
Differences between the genders
The migration of Irish people to mainland Britain and the USA has commonly
been linked to economic factors, especially the search for employment.
However, recent research shows that complex personal factors often influence
the desire to leave ones country
(Ryan, 2004). Mainland
Britains proximity to Ireland and the sharing of a common language make
it a convenient destination for Irish people who lack either the funds or the
commitment for more distant migration to the USA or Australia
(Leavey et al, 2004).
However, its convenience as a destination also facilitates escape and
short-term, unstable settlement. Our finding that poorly planned migration is
associated with depression in Irish men rather than women may be explained by
protective factors in women for which we have not fully accounted. Previous
research among young Irish people found that men tended to be optimistic about
migration, whereas women were more likely to find the prospect of migration
distressing (Carlsen & Nilsen,
1995). Mens sense of adventure and risk-taking may be part
of a continuum of which poor planning is one aspect, whereas for Irish women
poorly planned migration may be more closely associated with escape, but not
as part of a general pattern of behaviour. This is suggested by the higher
rates of marriage, parenthood and home ownership among the women in the
depression group than the men. Historically, male Irish employment in the UK
has been linked to the construction industry and has been associated with an
unsettled, peripatetic existence. Irish women have been much more likely to
find settled accommodation, often tied to service occupations
(Ryan, 2003;
Greenslade et al,
1991; Leavey et al,
2004). Participation in extended social support networks may help
Irish women migrants to maintain a positive sense of identity and self-esteem,
which has been linked to coping strategies and health awareness
(Walsh & McGrath,
2000).
The effect of age
The association between poorly planned migration and current depression was
stronger for younger than for older participants, although the results were
only significant in men. Men and women who had migrated from the 1960s onwards
tended to have a less well-planned migration than their older counterparts.
These younger participants also reported higher levels of discrimination and
lower levels of acculturation than the older respondents
(Table 4). Older respondents
may remember their migration in a more positive light
(Ryan, 2003). Older migrants
may be the survivors who have successfully adapted to life in mainland
Britain. Migrants who arrived there in the 1970s and 1980s may also have been
adversely affected by heightened anti-Irish sentiment associated with IRA
bombing campaigns in mainland Britain
(Hickman & Walter,
1997).
Implications
Among Irish migrants living in the UK, depression is associated with poorly
planned migration. Although such lack of planning might be an example of
general disorganisation linked with depression, an association remained
between poorly planned migration and current depression for men, after
adjustment for a history of depression in Ireland. This effect can be modified
by subsequent experiences in the host society, which suggests that there may
be opportunities for the prevention of depression among recently arrived
migrants. Immigration strategies for most migrant groups have involved a
degree of planning and preparation and consequently migration is rarely
spontaneous or haphazard (Jordan &
Duvall, 2003). Barriers of cost, distance and immigration
restrictions have meant that migration is usually undertaken by the more
advantaged (and thus healthier) members of society
(Nazroo, 2001). However, owing
to geographical proximity and ease of work force movement between Ireland and
mainland Britain, Irish migrants have been an exception to this rule
(Marmot et al,
1984).
Our findings may have implications for migrants and their destination countries wherever barriers are minimal. For example in the context of European Union enlargement, removal of legal restrictions and easier access to low-cost travel may facilitate impulsive, unplanned migration. A link between poorly planned migration and subsequent severe mental illness is consistent with evidence from other parts of Europe (Mortensen et al, 1997).
|
|
Clinical Implications and Limitations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LIMITATIONS
|
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The study was funded by the National Health Service (NHS) Executive, London Research and Development (R&D) Programme (Grant number RFG 699). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS Executive or the Department of Health. Part funding was also provided by the former North Central Thames Primary Care Research Network. The work was undertaken in collaboration with the R&D Department of Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust and was supported by Camden and Islington Mental Health and Social Care Trust.
|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Balarajan, R. (1995) Ethnicity and variations in the nations health. Health Trends, 271, 114 119.
Beck, A. T. & Steer, R. A. (1984) Internal consistencies of the original and revised Beck Depression Inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 1365 1367.[Medline]
Bernstein, D. P. & Fink, L. (1998) Childhood Trauma Questionnaire: A Retrospective Self-Report. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Bhugra, D. & Jones, P. (2001) Migration and
mental illness. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment,
7, 216
222.
Bracken, P. J., Greenslade, L., Griffin, B., et al
(1998) Mental health and ethnicity: an Irish dimension.
British Journal of Psychiatry,
172, 103
105.
Brooks, R. (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy, 37, 63 72.
Burke, A. W. (1976) Attempted suicide among the
Irish-born population in Birmingham. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 128, 534
537.
Carlsen, H. M. & Nilsen, E. L. (1995) Ireland, gender, psychological health and attitudes towards emigration. Psychological Reports, 76, 179 186.[Medline]
Cochrane, R. & Bal, S. S. (1989) Mental health admission rates of immigrants to England: a comparison of 1971 and 1981. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 24, 2 11.[CrossRef][Medline]
Commander, M. J., Odell, S., Sashidharan, S. P., et al (1999) Psychiatric morbidity in people born in Ireland. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 34, 565 569.[Medline]
Conigrave, K. M., Hall, W. D. & Saunders, J. B. (1995) The AUDIT questionnaire: choosing a cut-off score. Research Report. Addiction, 90, 1349 1356.[CrossRef][Medline]
Curran, M. J. (2003) Across the Water: The Acculturation and Health of Irish People in London. Dublin: Allen Library.
Greenslade, L., Pearson, M. & Madden, M. (1991) Irish Migrants in Britain: Socio-Economic and Demographic Conditions. Liverpool: Institute of Irish Studies, University of Liverpool.
Harrison, L. & Carr-Hill, R. (1992) Alcohol and Disadvantage among the Irish in Britain. London: Federation of Irish Societies.
Hennekens, C. H. & Buring, J. E. (1987) Epidemiology in Medicine. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co.
Hickman, M. J. & Walter, B. (1997) Discrimination and the Irish Community in Britain. London: Commission for Racial Equality.
Howes, E. (2004) 2001 Census Profiles: The Irish in London. London: Greater London Authority.
Jenkinson, C., Coulter, A. & Wright, L. (1993) Short Form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ, 306, 1437 1440.[Medline]
Jordan, B. & Duvall, F. (2003) Migration: The Boundaries of Equality and Justice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kelleher, D. & Hillier, S. (1996) The Health of the Irish in England. In Researching Cultural Differences in Health (eds D. Kelleher & S. Hillier), pp. 237 248. London: Routledge.
King, M., Speck, P. & Thomas, A. (1995) The Royal Free Interview for Religious and Spiritual Beliefs: development and standardisation. Psychological Medicine, 25, 1125 1134.[Medline]
Leavey, G. (1999) Suicide and Irish migrants in Britain: identity and integration. International Review of Psychiatry, 11, 168 172.[CrossRef]
Leavey, G., Clarke, G., King, M., et al
(1997) Health research on the Irish in Britain: invisible and
excluded. Psychiatric Bulletin,
21, 739
740.
Leavey, G., Sembhi, S. & Livingston, G. (2004) Older Irish migrants living in London: identity, loss and return. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30, 763 779.[CrossRef]
Marmot, M. G., Adelstein, A. M., Bulusu, L., et al (1984) Immigrant Mortality in England and Wales: Causes of Death by Country of Birth. London: HMSO.
Merril, J. & Owens, J. (1988) Self-poisoning among four immigrant groups. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 77, 77 80.[Medline]
Mortensen, P. B., Cantor-Graae, E. & McNeil, T. F. (1997) Increased rates of schizophrenia among immigrants: some methodological concerns raised by Danish findings. Psychological Medicine, 27, 813 820.[CrossRef][Medline]
Murphy, H. B. M. (1977) Migration, culture and mental illness. Psychological Medicine, 71, 677 684.
Nazroo, J. (1997) Ethnicity and Mental Health: Findings From a National Community Survey. London: Policy Studies Institute.
Nazroo, J. (2001) Ethnicity, Class and Health. London: Policy Studies Institute.
Neeleman, J., Mak, V. & Wessley, S. (1997)
Suicide by age, ethnic group, coroners verdicts and country of birth: a
three-year survey in inner London. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 171, 463
467.
Raleigh, V. & Balarajan, R. (1992) Suicide levels among immigrants in England and Wales. Health Trends, 24, 91 94.
Robins, L. N., Wing, J. K., Wittchen, H. U., et al (1988) The Composite International Diagnostic Interview. An epidemiologic instrument for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 1069 1077.[Abstract]
Ryan, L. (2003) Moving spaces and changing places: Irish womens memories of emigration to Britain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 29, 67 82.[CrossRef]
Ryan, L. (2004) Family matters: (e)migration, familial networks and Irish women in Britain. Sociological Review, 52, 351 370.[CrossRef]
Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., et al (1993) Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Addiction, 88, 791 804[CrossRef][Medline]
Sherbourne, C. D. & Stewart, A. L. (1991) The MOS Social Support Survey. Social Science and Medicine, 32, 705 714.[CrossRef]
Sproston, K. & Nazroo, J. (eds) (2002) Ethnic Minority Psychiatric Illness Rates in the Community (EMPIRIC). London: Stationery Office.
Walsh, J. J. & McGrath, F. P. (2000) Identity, coping style and health behaviour amongst first-generation Irish immigrants to England. Psychology and Health, 15, 467 482.
Weich, S., Nazroo, J., Sproston, K., et al (2004) Common mental disorders and ethnicity in England. The EMPIRIC study. Psychological Medicine, 34, 1543 1551.[CrossRef][Medline]
Williams, R. (1992) The health of the Irish in Britain. In The Politics of Race and Health (ed. W. Ahmad), pp. 81103. Bradford: Race Relations Unit.
World Health Organization (1997) Composite International Diagnostic Instrument (CIDI). Version 2.1. Geneva: WHO.
Zigmond, A. S. & Snaith, R. P. (1983) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361 370.[Medline]
Received for publication October 26, 2004. Revision received March 7, 2006. Accepted for publication March 8, 2006.
Related articles in BJP:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Ryan and A. Golden 'Tick the Box Please': A Reflexive Approach to Doing Quantitative Social Research Sociology, December 1, 2006; 40(6): 1191 - 1200. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Minerva BMJ, June 17, 2006; 332(7555): 1460 - 1460. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |