|
|
|||||||||||
SHORT REPORTS |
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK and Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
Neurosciences Institute, San Diego, California, USA
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
Correspondence: Dr K. Matsumoto, Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, 980-8574 Japan. Email: kaz-mat{at}umin.ac.jp
Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.
|
|
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
METHOD |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Stimuli and materials
An English version of the music and prosody discrimination task
(Patel et al, 1998)
was used for the study. The stimuli for the test consist of lexically matched
sentence pairs, listed in Nicholson et al (2003), and their musical
(non-verbal) analogues. Both the sentence pairs and the musical pairs could
differ on one of the three different prosodic attributes. The three variations
were: (a) statement-question pairs differing in terminal pitch pattern; (b)
focus-shift pairs differing in their internal pitch pattern; (c) timing-shift
pairs, which differed in the placement of pauses.
The analogous music pairs were generated from the fundamental frequency and temporal patterns of the syllables used in the verbal sentences, with a fixed pitch for each syllable.
Procedure
Each participant was seated in a quiet room and digitised stimuli were
presented by computer over headphones. The three pairs of sentences or musical
phrases (i.e. statement-question pairs for terminal pitch discrimination,
focus-shift pairs for internal pitch discrimination and timing-shift pairs for
rhythm discrimination in prosodic and musical discrimination tasks) were
presented in a total of six counterbalanced blocks. Each block was composed of
one of the six stimulus types and contained a total of 32 trials with 16 same
pairs and 16 different pairs. The average length of stimulus was 2.0 s
(s.d.=0.5). The intrapair interval was 1 s and the interpair interval was 5 s.
Participants were asked to indicate whether members of the pair were identical
on the presentation of a visual cue.
|
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The accuracy of the task was defined as the number of pairs correctly judged as same or different. Between-group differences were assessed with the Mann-Whitney U-test because the scores were not normally distributed. Exact P-values calculated using SPSS, were reported. During the prosody discrimination tasks, patients showed a significant reduction in the accuracy of the internal pitch (focus-shift pairs) discrimination compared with controls (see data supplement to the online version of this paper). The musical analogue of this task also demonstrated a significant decrement in patients compared with controls. There was no difference in the patients' ability to detect terminal pitch alterations (statement-question pairs) in either the verbal or musical forms. The patients did demonstrate a non-significant decrement in the accuracy of the detection of timing shift (rhythm) changes in both verbal and musical forms (see data supplement to the online version of this paper). The correlation of each task performance with positive symptom scores of BPRS was tested using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. The accuracy of the internal pitch discrimination of sentences was negatively correlated with positive symptom score in patients (r=70.56, P=0.03). There was no correlation with other performance data.
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The correlation analysis showed that the disturbance of internal pitch discrimination of the verbal prosodic sentences was associated with the presence of positive symptoms, suggesting that a specific deficit in discriminating prosodic features might contribute to the genesis of positive psychotic symptoms. This is consistent with reported disturbance of self-monitoring of distorted (changes in pitch) speech evident in patients with schizophrenia experiencing hallucinations and delusions (Johns et al, 2001). In our study, both groups of participants demonstrated similar patterns of discrimination performance on the different tasks (terminal pitch, internal pitch or rhythm) between verbal and musical prosodic analogues. This is compatible with a notion that verbal prosodic and musical information share common neural resources (Patel et al, 1998), and that this is dysfunctional in patients with schizophrenia. However, the association of internal pitch discrimination with positive symptoms, observed in the correlational analysis, was only evident in the verbal prosodic domain, suggesting a specific abnormality of verbal rather than musical prosody for the formation of positive symptoms. This requires further clarification.
Previous studies have shown that patients with schizophrenia fail to make a categorical judgement of emotion according to prosodic difference (Murphy & Cutting, 1990; Ross et al, 2001). There is a suggestion that the mechanism underlying accurate discrimination of affective prosody relies on pitch perception (Scherer, 1986); difficulties in pitch discrimination may therefore contribute to the disturbed perception of emotional prosody in schizophrenia. However, we did not directly assess the relation between pitch perception and emotional prosody in this study. Future work could usefully explore the relation of deficient pitch discrimination with abnormal affective prosody in schizophrenia and their role in formation of positive symptoms.
|
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Frith, C. D. & Done, D. J. (1988) Towards a
neuropsychology of schizophrenia. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 153, 437
-443.
George, M. S., Parekh, P. I., Rosinsky, N., et al (1996) Understanding emotional prosody activates right hemisphere regions. Archives of Neurology, 53, 665 -670.[Abstract]
Johns, L. C., Rossell, S., Frith, C., et al (2001) Verbal self-monitoring and auditory verbal hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine, 31, 705 -715.[CrossRef][Medline]
Murphy, D. & Cutting, J. (1990) Prosodic comprehension and expression in schizophrenia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 53, 727 -730.[Abstract]
Nelson, H. E. (1982) National Adult Reading Test. Windsor: nfer Nelson.
Nicolson, K. G., Baum, S., Kilgour, A., et al (2003) Impaired processing of prosodic and musical patterns after right hemisphere damage. Brain and Cognition, 52, 382 -389.[CrossRef][Medline]
Overall, J. E. & Gorham, D. R. (1962) The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychological Reports, 10, 790 -812.
Patel, A. D., Peretz, I., Tramo, M., et al (1998) Processing prosodic and musical patterns: a neuropsychological investigation. Brain and Language, 61, 123 -144.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ross, E. D., Orbelo, D. M., Cartwright, J., et al
(2001) Affective-prosodic deficits in schizophrenia:
comparison to patients with brain damage and relation to schizophrenic
symptoms. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and
Psychiatry, 70, 597
-604.
Scherer, K. R. (1986) Vocal affect expression: a review and a model for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 143 -165.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shergill, S. S., Brammer, M. J., Williams, S. C., et al
(2000a) Mapping auditory hallucinations in
schizophrenia using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Archives
of General Psychiatry, 57, 1033
-1038.
Shergill, S. S., Bullmore, E., Simmons, A., et al
(2000b) Functional anatomy of auditory verbal
imagery in schizophrenic patients with auditory hallucinations.
American Journal of Psychiatry,
157, 1691
-1693.
Received for publication January 26, 2005. Revision received June 1, 2005. Accepted for publication July 1, 2005.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |