The British Journal of Psychiatry (2006) 189: 180-181. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.009332
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Prosodic discrimination in patients with schizophrenia
K. Matsumoto, MD, PhD
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK and
Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai,
Japan
G. T. Samson, BSc
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
O. D. O'Daly, MSc
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
D. K. Tracy, MRCPsych
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
A. D. Patel, PhD
Neurosciences Institute, San Diego, California, USA
S. S. Shergill, MRCPsych, PhD
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Wellcome Department
of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University College London,
London, UK
Correspondence:
Dr K. Matsumoto, Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University School of
Medicine, Sendai, 980-8574 Japan. Email:
kaz-mat{at}umin.ac.jp
Declaration of interest None.
Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.

ABSTRACT
Summary Fifteen patients with prominent positive symptoms of
schizophrenia and 15 normal controls performed verbal prosodic
and pure
musical discrimination tasks, with changes in pitch
and timing parameters. The
patients' performance was comparable
to that of controls on the discrimination
of terminal pitch
changes, but significantly poorer on the more difficult
internal
pitch discrimination. The latter deficit was positively correlated
with the severity of their positive symptoms. The results suggest
that
patients have a deficit in processing fundamental aspects
of prosody, which is
associated with the presence of positive
symptoms.

INTRODUCTION
Auditory verbal hallucinations and persecutory delusions are
cardinal
features of schizophrenia. Their pathophysiology is
unclear; one prominent
model (
Frith & Done, 1988)
proposes
that auditory verbal hallucinations occur because self-generated
inner speech is misperceived as externally generated speech
owing to a failure
to recognise one's own inner speech and
that delusions may develop as
secondary phenomena. Functional
imaging has suggested a prominent involvement
of the right
temporal cortex, which has been associated with processing
affective
prosodic information (
George
et al, 1996), when patients are
experiencing auditory
hallucinations (
Shergill et al,
2000a).
Prosodic information may contribute to accurate
verbal self-monitoring
and its disturbance may contribute in the aetiology of
such
positive symptoms of psychosis
(
Shergill et al,
2000b;
Johns et
al, 2001).
Although the discrimination of affective prosody
has been demonstrated
to be abnormal in patients with schizophrenia
(
Murphy & Cutting, 1990;
Ross et al, 2001),
there has been little investigation of
the more elementary processing of the
perception of pitch and
temporal pattern which contribute to affective prosody
(
Scherer, 1986).
In this study
we examined prosodic discrimination in patients
with schizophrenia
experiencing prominent persecutory symptoms.

METHOD
Participants
Fifteen patients with schizophrenia (mean age 36.9 years, s.d.=11.6)
were
studied. Patients were recruited from wards and clinics
at the South London
and Maudsley National Health Service Trust,
London, and selected if they were
currently exhibiting prominent
positive symptoms. Diagnosis was based on
DSM-IV criteria for
schizophrenia (
American
Psychiatric Association, 1994), a detailed
clinical interview and
review of the hospital case notes. For
the control group, 15 individuals
without a history of psychiatric
illness (mean age 34.4 years, s.d.=12.3) were
recruited through
advertisement from the same geographical area as the
patients
and matched with respect to age, gender, verbal IQ and years
of
education. Applicants were excluded if they met criteria
for substance misuse
or had a history of neurological illness.
Nine patients and nine controls were
male; all participants
were right-handed. Patients and controls did not differ
in
education (mean 15.3 years and 16.6 years respectively) or in
estimated
verbal IQ by National Adult Reading Test
(
Nelson, 1982)
(mean 110 and
114, respectively). Patients were assessed using
the Brief Psychiatric Rating
Scale (BPRS;
Overall & Gorham,
1962).
All participants provided written informed consent after a
full
description of the study and the study was approved by the local
ethics
committee.
Stimuli and materials
An English version of the music and prosody discrimination task
(Patel et al, 1998)
was used for the study. The stimuli for the test consist of lexically matched
sentence pairs, listed in Nicholson et al (2003), and their musical
(non-verbal) analogues. Both the sentence pairs and the musical pairs could
differ on one of the three different prosodic attributes. The three variations
were: (a) statement-question pairs differing in terminal pitch pattern; (b)
focus-shift pairs differing in their internal pitch pattern; (c) timing-shift
pairs, which differed in the placement of pauses.
The analogous music pairs were generated from the fundamental frequency and
temporal patterns of the syllables used in the verbal sentences, with a fixed
pitch for each syllable.
Procedure
Each participant was seated in a quiet room and digitised stimuli were
presented by computer over headphones. The three pairs of sentences or musical
phrases (i.e. statement-question pairs for terminal pitch discrimination,
focus-shift pairs for internal pitch discrimination and timing-shift pairs for
rhythm discrimination in prosodic and musical discrimination tasks) were
presented in a total of six counterbalanced blocks. Each block was composed of
one of the six stimulus types and contained a total of 32 trials with 16 same
pairs and 16 different pairs. The average length of stimulus was 2.0 s
(s.d.=0.5). The intrapair interval was 1 s and the interpair interval was 5 s.
Participants were asked to indicate whether members of the pair were identical
on the presentation of a visual cue.

RESULTS
Statistical analyses were carried out using the Statistical
Package for the
Social Sciences (SPSS) version 10.0 for Windows.
All except one patient were
treated with antipsychotic medication,
the majority with atypical
antipsychotic medication, but were
still moderately symptomatic with a mean
score of 39.6 (s.d.=12)
on the BPRS. All patients had prominent persecutory
positive
symptoms, with 13 patients scoring 4 or more on individual items
related to distressing hallucinatory behaviour or persecutory
delusions.
The accuracy of the task was defined as the number of pairs correctly
judged as same or different. Between-group differences were assessed with the
Mann-Whitney U-test because the scores were not normally distributed.
Exact P-values calculated using SPSS, were reported. During the
prosody discrimination tasks, patients showed a significant reduction in the
accuracy of the internal pitch (focus-shift pairs) discrimination compared
with controls (see data supplement to the online version of this paper). The
musical analogue of this task also demonstrated a significant decrement in
patients compared with controls. There was no difference in the patients'
ability to detect terminal pitch alterations (statement-question pairs) in
either the verbal or musical forms. The patients did demonstrate a
non-significant decrement in the accuracy of the detection of timing shift
(rhythm) changes in both verbal and musical forms (see data supplement to the
online version of this paper). The correlation of each task performance with
positive symptom scores of BPRS was tested using the Spearman rank correlation
coefficient. The accuracy of the internal pitch discrimination of sentences
was negatively correlated with positive symptom score in patients
(r=70.56, P=0.03). There was no correlation with other
performance data.

DISCUSSION
Our findings suggest that patients with schizophrenia have a
deficit in
discriminating fundamental acoustic features underlying
prosodic and music
perception. Although the ability of patients
to discriminate the terminal
pitch alterations within both
prosodic and musical tasks was unimpaired, they
showed a deficit
during the internal pitch discrimination in both modalities.
Because the internal pitch discrimination places greater demands
on
maintaining and comparing pitch patterns than the terminal
pitch
discrimination task (
Patel et al,
1998), poor performance
on the former task in patients might be
attributable to a deficit
in the working memory process. However, this would
also be
expected to lead to similar decrements in the performance of
the
timing-shift (rhythm) pairs, which was not the case. It
suggests that working
memory aspects may be a contributory
factor but are not the fundamental cause
of the observed deficits.
An additional working memory task might have helped
to control
for this. It is possible that increasing the sample size might
make
some of the trends in the data more significant.
The correlation analysis showed that the disturbance of internal pitch
discrimination of the verbal prosodic sentences was associated with the
presence of positive symptoms, suggesting that a specific deficit in
discriminating prosodic features might contribute to the genesis of positive
psychotic symptoms. This is consistent with reported disturbance of
self-monitoring of distorted (changes in pitch) speech evident in patients
with schizophrenia experiencing hallucinations and delusions
(Johns et al, 2001).
In our study, both groups of participants demonstrated similar patterns of
discrimination performance on the different tasks (terminal pitch, internal
pitch or rhythm) between verbal and musical prosodic analogues. This is
compatible with a notion that verbal prosodic and musical information share
common neural resources (Patel et
al, 1998), and that this is dysfunctional in patients with
schizophrenia. However, the association of internal pitch discrimination with
positive symptoms, observed in the correlational analysis, was only evident in
the verbal prosodic domain, suggesting a specific abnormality of verbal rather
than musical prosody for the formation of positive symptoms. This requires
further clarification.
Previous studies have shown that patients with schizophrenia fail to make a
categorical judgement of emotion according to prosodic difference
(Murphy & Cutting, 1990;
Ross et al, 2001).
There is a suggestion that the mechanism underlying accurate discrimination of
affective prosody relies on pitch perception
(Scherer, 1986); difficulties
in pitch discrimination may therefore contribute to the disturbed perception
of emotional prosody in schizophrenia. However, we did not directly assess the
relation between pitch perception and emotional prosody in this study. Future
work could usefully explore the relation of deficient pitch discrimination
with abnormal affective prosody in schizophrenia and their role in formation
of positive symptoms.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
K.M. was partly supported by the Mitsubishi Pharma Research
Foundation;
O.O'D. was supported by the Psychiatry Research
Trust; A.D.P. was supported by
an Esther J. Burnham Fellowship
at the Neurosciences Institute and S.S. was
supported by a
Wellcome Trust Advanced Clinical Training Fellowship.

REFERENCES
- American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th
edn)
(DSM -IV). Washington, DC: APA.
- Frith, C. D. & Done, D. J. (1988) Towards a
neuropsychology of schizophrenia. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 153, 437
-443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- George, M. S., Parekh, P. I., Rosinsky, N., et al
(1996) Understanding emotional prosody activates right
hemisphere regions. Archives of Neurology,
53, 665
-670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Johns, L. C., Rossell, S., Frith, C., et al
(2001) Verbal self-monitoring and auditory verbal
hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia. Psychological
Medicine, 31, 705
-715.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Murphy, D. & Cutting, J. (1990) Prosodic
comprehension and expression in schizophrenia. Journal of
Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry,
53, 727
-730.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Nelson, H. E. (1982) National Adult
Reading Test. Windsor: nfer Nelson.
- Nicolson, K. G., Baum, S., Kilgour, A., et al
(2003) Impaired processing of prosodic and musical patterns
after right hemisphere damage. Brain and Cognition,
52, 382
-389.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Overall, J. E. & Gorham, D. R. (1962) The
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychological Reports,
10, 790
-812.
- Patel, A. D., Peretz, I., Tramo, M., et al
(1998) Processing prosodic and musical patterns: a
neuropsychological investigation. Brain and Language,
61, 123
-144.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Ross, E. D., Orbelo, D. M., Cartwright, J., et al
(2001) Affective-prosodic deficits in schizophrenia:
comparison to patients with brain damage and relation to schizophrenic
symptoms. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and
Psychiatry, 70, 597
-604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Scherer, K. R. (1986) Vocal affect expression:
a review and a model for future research. Psychological
Bulletin, 99, 143
-165.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Shergill, S. S., Brammer, M. J., Williams, S. C., et al
(2000a) Mapping auditory hallucinations in
schizophrenia using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Archives
of General Psychiatry, 57, 1033
-1038.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Shergill, S. S., Bullmore, E., Simmons, A., et al
(2000b) Functional anatomy of auditory verbal
imagery in schizophrenic patients with auditory hallucinations.
American Journal of Psychiatry,
157, 1691
-1693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication January 26, 2005.
Revision received June 1, 2005.
Accepted for publication July 1, 2005.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Badcock
The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Auditory Hallucinations: A Parallel Auditory Pathways Framework
Schizophr Bull,
October 2, 2008;
(2008)
sbn128v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. I. Leitman, P. Laukka, P. N. Juslin, E. Saccente, P. Butler, and D. C. Javitt
Getting the Cue: Sensory Contributions to Auditory Emotion Recognition Impairments in Schizophrenia
Schizophr Bull,
September 23, 2008;
(2008)
sbn115v2.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R Dadds and T. Rhodes
Aggression in young children with concurrent callous-unemotional traits: can the neurosciences inform progress and innovation in treatment approaches?
Phil Trans R Soc B,
August 12, 2008;
363(1503):
2567 - 2576.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|