|
|
|||||||||||
EDITORIAL |
Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
Scottish Poisons Information Bureau, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh
Departemnt of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Correspondence: José M. Bertolote, Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, 20 avenue Appia, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland. Email: bbertolotej{at}who.int
Declaration of interest D.G. and M.E. are on the Scientific Advisory Group of a Syngenta-funded study to assess the toxicity of a new formulation of paraquat; they have received travel expenses to attend research group meetings.
|
|
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The research and policy attention that pesticide poisoning has received has been relatively small in comparison with the magnitude of the problem (Gunnell & Eddleston, 2003; Buckley et al, 2004). Jeyaratnam (1985a) suggested that part of the reason why pesticide poisoning had not received the global attention it deserved was the lack of scientific evidence concerning the extent of the problem. Even though a global estimate is still not possible today, because of the lack of large-scale, rigorous surveillance data, evidence is growing that the burden of pesticide poisoning has by no means been underestimated. Although data from low-income countries in South America are less comprehensive than from China and South-East Asia, evidence is emerging that pesticide poisoning is equally important in such settings. In Brazil, for example, the high suicide rates in tobacco growing regions may be owing to the wide use and availability of pesticides (Csillag, 1996). Furthermore, pesticides accounted for 18% of male and 7% of female hospital admissions for self-harm in Campinas, Brazil, in 2002-2004 (Fleischmann et al, 2005). In Southern Trinidad, over 80% of suicides in one rural area were by pesticide poisoning (Hutchinson et al, 1999). In Suriname, a high proportion of both fatal (55%) and non-fatal (44%) episodes of suicidal behaviour involved pesticides (Graafsma et al, 2006). In Africa, data from Zimbabwe show rising levels of admissions for organophosphate self-poisoning; self-poisoning accounted for about three-quarters of the approximately 200 admissions in one study (Dong & Simon, 2001). More recently, data from Malawi implicated pesticide self-poisoning in almost 80% of suicides (Dzamalala et al, 2006).
Despite the problems in estimating the global burden of pesticide poisoning, we may safely assume that we are confronted with millions of cases of pesticide poisoning, hundreds of thousands of which result in deaths each year in low- and middle-income countries. There is an urgent need for immediate action.
|
|
APPROACHES TO SUICIDE PREVENTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mental disorders are found less frequently in suicides in Asian than in Western countries, possibly because a greater proportion of deaths in Asia result from the use of highly lethal pesticides in impulsive acts of self-harm. Nevertheless, mental illness is present in a significant proportion of Asian suicides (Phillips et al, 2002) and is thought to play an important role in suicidal behaviours, underlining the role of psychiatrists and other mental health workers in these settings.
Epidemiological evidence demonstrates that restricting access to commonly used methods of suicide may lead to reductions in overall as well as method-specific suicide rates. The potential impact of changing the availability of pesticides on both pesticide poisoning and overall suicide numbers has been demonstrated in Western Samoa (Bowles, 1995). Furthermore, the benefits of restricting pesticide use to those compounds least harmful to humans in self-poisoning is demonstrated by the widely differing case fatality rates associated with different pesticides - from >60% for paraquat (Hettiarachchi & Kodithuwakku, 1989) to <10% for several other products (Eddleston, 2000; Eddleston et al, 2005). Likewise, just as the development and widespread use of N-acetyl cysteine had a dramatic effect on trends in paracetamol mortality in England and Wales (Flanagan & Rooney, 2002), so too may the development of new antidotes to pesticide self-poisoning reduce suicides in low- and middle-income countries. International research in this area should be a global priority (Buckley et al, 2004). However, to date, the global response to the problem of self-poisoning with pesticides has been poor.
|
|
AN INTERSECTORAL GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH INITIATIVE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There are three components to the World Health Organization strategy. First, to establish sentinel projects in selected countries with a high burden of intentional and unintentional pesticide poisoning. Second, to establish regional centres, associated with the sentinel project sites, for the prevention and management of pesticide poisoning and for enhanced surveillance, training and community action. Third, to disseminate information to governments, decision makers and the public at large about insights, experience, and lessons learnt from research, formulated as recommendations to guide global policy and local action for the prevention and management of pesticide poisoning.
When suicidal behaviour plays an important role in non-fatal and fatal self-poisoning by pesticides, it is key that relevant preventive measures are anchored in national suicide prevention programmes; these, unfortunately, mostly do not exist as yet in low- and middle-income countries. To this end, the World Health Organization has started to work with governments worldwide to raise awareness of the importance and magnitude of suicidal behaviours and to provide technical assistance in the development and implementation of national strategies for suicide prevention.
It is crucial that governments ratify and implement the hazardous chemicals and wastes conventions (i.e. the Basel, Rotterdam, and Stockholm Conventions) which cover key elements of the management of hazardous chemicals (see http://www.basel.int; http://www.pic.int; http://www.pops.int). Whereas this first crucial step has been taken by many countries, the implementation poses major challenges, such as the shortage of funds, the lack of expertise, human resources and training, the need for advanced technologies and equipment, the limited database systems available and the lack of public awareness. Konradsen et al (2005) stressed the need for these conventions not only to propose actions such as phasing out the most toxic chemicals, promoting alternative pest management strategies, or improving safe storage, but also to explicitly include self-poisonings in risk assessments and to deal directly with the subject of self-harm.
|
|
CLOSING REMARKS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although little has been done in low- and middle-income countries, there is encouraging work in progress. Pilot studies are under way in some areas of China and Sri Lanka to assess the effects on suicide and suicide attempts in rural areas of the adoption by farmers of a double-locked box where pesticides are stored. In Sri Lanka, the non-governmental organisation Sumithrayo and other groups are active in evaluating interventions of this sort. Early results from one group working on the feasibility of double-locked boxes in Sri Lanka suggest that this is a practical approach to pursue, if developed in collaboration with local communities, signalling the importance of large-scale evaluations (F. Konradsen, personal communication, 2006). With creativity, willingness and appropriate funds much can be done to prevent this unnecessary loss of life.
Considerable work is still required to determine the appropriate balance between public health approaches to reduce pesticide poisoning and the need of the agricultural sector for crop protection products.
Action has to be effective at least in the areas of pesticide policy, pesticide information, mental healthcare, clinical management of pesticide intoxication and restricting hazardous exposure to pesticides. In view of the complexity and novelty of many of these areas, a solid yet feasible research programme has to back them. This will only succeed if broad intersectoral and financial support is made available involving the governmental and the private sector, including relevant non-governmental organisations and agencies of the United Nations.
|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Buckley, N. A., Roberts, D., Eddleston, M.
(2004) Overcoming global apathy in research on
organophosphate poisoning. BMJ,
329, 1231
-1233.
Csillag, C. (1996) Brazil's soaring suicide rate revealed. Lancet, 348, 1651.
Dong, X. & Simon, M. A. (2001) The epidemiology of organophosphate poisoning in urban Zimbabwe from 1995 to 2000. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 7, 333 -338.
Dzamalala, C. P., Milner, D. A. & Liomba, N. G. (2006) Suicide in Blantyre, Malawi (2000-2003). Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 13, 65-69.[CrossRef][Medline]
Eddleston, M. (2000) Patterns and problems of
deliberate self-poisoning in the developing world. QJM: Monthly
Journal of the Association of Physicians,
93, 715
-731.
Eddleston, M., Eyer, P., Worek, F., et al (2005) Differences between organophosphorus insecticides in human self-poisoning: a prospective cohort study. Lancet, 366, 1452 -1459.[CrossRef][Medline]
Flanagan, R. J. & Rooney, C. (2002) Reducing acute poisoning deaths. Forensic Science International, 128, 3 -19.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fleischmann, A., Bertolote, J. M., de Leo, D., et al (2005) Characteristics of attempted suicides seen in emergency-care settings of general hospitals in eight low- and middle-income countries. Psychological Medicine, 35, 1467 -1474.[CrossRef][Medline]
Graafsma, T., Kerkhof, A., Gibson, D., et al (2006) High rates of suicide and attempted suicide using pesticides in Nickerie, Suriname, South America. Crisis, 27, in press.
Gunnell, D. & Eddleston, M. (2003) Suicide
by intentional ingestion of pesticides: a continuing tragedy in developing
countries. International Journal of Epidemiology,
32, 902
-909.
Hettiarachchi, J. & Kodithuwakku, G. C. S.
(1989) Pattern of poisoning in rural Sri Lanka.
International Journal of Epidemiology,
18, 418
-422.
Hutchinson, G., Daisley, H., Simeon, D., et al (1999) High rates of paraquat-induced suicide in southern Trinidad. Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior, 29, 186 -191.
Jeyaratnam, J. (1985a) Health problems of pesticide usage in the third world. British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 42, 505 -506.[Medline]
Jeyaratnam, J. (1985b) 1984 and occupational health in developing countries. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health, 11, 229 -234.
Konradsen, F., van der Hoek, W., Gunnell, D., et al (2005) Missing deaths from pesticide self-poisoning in the IFCS Forum IV. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 83, 157 -158.[Medline]
Phillips, M. R., Yang, G., Zhang, Y., et al (2002) Risk factors for suicide in China: a national case - control psychological autopsy study. Lancet, 360, 1728 -1736.[CrossRef][Medline]
World Health Organization (2003) The World Health Report 2003; Shaping the Future. Geneva: WHO.
World Health Organization (2004) The Prevention of Mental Disorders: Effective Interventions and Policy Options. Geneva: WHO.
Received for publication December 16, 2005. Revision received April 3, 2006. Accepted for publication May 2, 2006.
Related articles in BJP:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A Varnik, K Kolves, C M van der Feltz-Cornelis, A Marusic, H Oskarsson, A Palmer, T Reisch, G Scheerder, E Arensman, E Aromaa, et al. Suicide methods in Europe: a gender-specific analysis of countries participating in the "European Alliance Against Depression" J. Epidemiol. Community Health, June 1, 2008; 62(6): 545 - 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Alex, J. Prasad, A. Kuruvilla, and K. S. Jacob Self-poisoning with pesticides in India The British Journal of Psychiatry, March 1, 2007; 190(3): 274 - 275. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Eddleston and F. Konradsen Commentary: Time for a re-assessment of the incidence of intentional and unintentional injury in India and South East Asia Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2007; 36(1): 208 - 211. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |