| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Health Sciences Research Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry
Public Health & Policy Research Unit, Institute of Community Health Sciences, Barts and The London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK
Correspondence: Dr John Powell, Health Sciences Research Institute, Medical School Building, Gibbet Hill Campus, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK. Email: john.powell{at}warwick.ac.uk
Funding detailed in Acknowledgement.
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Aims To investigate the prevalence of internet use for mental health information-seeking and its relative importance as a mental health information source.
Method General population survey. Questions covered internet use, past psychiatric history and the 12-item General Health Questionnaire.
Results Eighteen per cent of all internet users had used the internet for information related to mental health. The prevalence was higher among those with a past history of mental health problems and those with current psychological distress. Only 12% of respondents selected the internet as one of the three most accurate sources of information, compared with 24% who responded that it was one of the three sources they would use.
Conclusions The internet has a significant role in mental health information-seeking. The internet is used more than it is trusted.
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
METHOD |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
The survey also included demographic questions, a question on previous psychiatric history and the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12; Goldberg, 1972). This is a validated self-completion instrument to assess current mental health status, chosen for its brevity and validity. The layout and appearance of the questionnaire were informed by best practice in questionnaire design (McColl et al, 2001). It was brief, to encourage a high response rate (Edwards et al, 2002). Survey pretesting and piloting were undertaken with purposive samples of the general population.
To detect a 25% difference in use of the internet for health information between those who did and those who did not have current experience of mental health problems, with 80% power and 5% significance, the survey sample required 1800 individuals (assuming that there is a 50% response rate, 45% use the internet, 60% of these have used it for health information and 25% have some current experience of mental health problems). It was therefore mailed to 1800 potential respondents. Two duplicate mailings and one postcard reminder were sent following the initial mailing, and respondents could opt to be entered in a prize draw.
Analysis
Data were double-entered. Responses were confidential and data for analysis
were anonymised. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 13.0
for Windows and StatsDirect version 2.4.5 (StatsDirect Ltd, Sale, Cheshire,
UK;
http:.//www.statsdirect.com)
were used for data analysis. To determine health status the GHQ-12 scores of
respondents were calculated using the standard GHQ scoring method
(Goldberg & Williams,
1988); a cut-off score of 2 or more indicated the presence of
psychological distress (Goldberg,
1972). Univariate significance testing was carried out using
chi-squared difference in proportions. Multivariate logistic regression
explored the relationship between internet use, current mental health status
(GHQ-12 score), past psychiatric history and socio-demographic variables.
Except where stated, all P values refer to 
2
comparisons of proportions.
|
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Sample characteristics
The median age-group was 46-55 years for both men and women. There were
46.0% men and 54.0% women in the respondent sample. The mean GHQ-12 score was
1.8. Overall, 34.0% of respondents (n=312) had some evidence of
current mental health disturbance (GHQ-12 scores of 2 or more) and 20.1% of
respondents (n=184) had mental health disturbance rated as high or
severe (GHQ-12 scores of 4 or greater). Of the sample, 18.2% had a
self-reported history of significant mental health problems (166 out of 910
who answered this question), defined as a mental health issue or problem that
had led to a consultation with a doctor or other health professional. There
was a gender difference, with 15.7% of men (65/415) and 20.9% of women
(101/484) reporting such history (P=0.039).
Internet use
Of the total sample, 58.8% reported ever having used the internet
(539/917). There was no difference by gender, with 59.9% men (249/416) and
58.2% women (284/488) having used the internet (P=0.59). There was a
large and significant difference by age, with 84.5% of respondents aged 45
years and under (299/354) reporting ever having used the internet v.
42.9% (240/560) of those aged 46 years and over (P<0.001). There
was also a large and significant difference by level of educational
attainment, with 37.9% (153/404) of those who did not have qualifications at
A-level standard or above having used the internet, compared with 85.0%
(335/394) of those who had this qualification or above (P<0.001).
Of the whole sample, 37.4% (343/917) had used the internet for general health
information ('finding out about any aspect of health or healthcare'). This
represented 63.6% of those who had ever used the internet. There was no
relationship between general internet use or health-related internet use and
either current mental health status (GHQ-12 score) or having a previous
episode of mental illness, once the effects of age and educational attainment
were controlled for using logistic regression. For all regression analyses the
effects of GHQ-12 caseness and of past psychiatric history were examined
separately, owing to the lack of independence of these variables.
Use of the internet to find out about a mental health issue
Of the whole sample, 10.6% (97/917) had used the internet to find out about
mental health, representing 18.0% (97/539) of all people who had ever used the
internet. The equivalent figures were 15.1% for respondents with GHQ-12 scores
of 2 or more (22.8% of those who had internet access) and 20.5% for
respondents with a past history of mental health problems (31.5% of those who
had internet access). Differences by age and educational level disappeared
after allowing for differential access to the internet. Differences by past
psychiatric history and GHQ-12 status remained statistically significant after
allowing for internet access once the effects of age, gender and educational
level were controlled for (Table
1). This analysis showed that internet users with current
experience of mental health distress were more likely to have used the
internet to find information about a mental health issue than those without
current mental health distress (OR=1.82, 95% CI 1.14-2.89, P=0.012)
and those with a past history of a serious mental health problem were more
likely to have used the internet for this purpose than those with no such
history (OR=2.83, 95% CI 1.71-4.68, P<0.001).
|
Nine of the respondents had used the internet to chat (using live interaction in a chatroom or via instant messenger) with someone else about mental health issues (1.0% of the whole sample, 1.7% of internet users). These were four men and five women with a wide spread of age-group (18-75 years) and educational attainment (O-levels to degree). All nine had current mental health distress (GHQ-12 score of 2 or above) and five had experienced a serious mental health problem in the past.
Relative importance of the internet as a source of mental health information
Respondents were asked to select three sources they believed provided the
most accurate information on mental health issues.
Table 2 shows that 12.1%
selected the internet as one of the top three most accurate sources of
information on mental health issues. For the whole population and for those
with and without current mental health problems, the results clearly
demonstrate the trust put in health professionals, with mental health workers
and general practitioners being rated the most accurate sources. There was no
major difference by GHQ-12 caseness (2=11.74, d.f.=12,
P=0.47). Third place was taken by leaflets produced by the National
Health Service (NHS) or by voluntary organisations and charities. Fourth
ranking was `someone else with the same mental health problems', and this
received relatively more votes from people with mental health problems. The
internet was ranked eighth overall, and sixth by people with mental health
problems, although the scoring between the fifth- and eighth-ranked sources
was very close. There was a gender difference (2=31.76,
d.f.=12, P<.01), explained by mental health professionals being
ranked ahead of general practitioners by women, whereas men ranked general
practitioners slightly ahead of mental health professionals.
|
Respondents were also asked to indicate which three sources of information
they would be most likely to use if they were seeking information on a
personal mental health issue. Table
3 shows that 24% of both the general population and those with
current mental health distress indicated that the internet was one of the
three sources they would use, suggesting the internet is used more than it is
trusted as an accurate medium. Table
3 also shows that general practitioners and mental health workers
not only were considered the most accurate sources, but also were the most
likely to be used. The internet was rated fourth overall and third equal by
those with mental health problems: there was no major difference by GHQ-12
caseness (2=9.72, d.f.=13, P=0.72).
|
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
We believe that this is the first study to investigate the population prevalence of internet use for mental health information and the relative importance of the internet as a mental health information source. There has been work on internet use for general health matters, which shows similar findings to our survey with approximately 40% of internet users having accessed health information (Baker et al, 2003).
Limitations of the study
Cross-sectional sampling can only identify the views and reported behaviour
of respondents at one point in time. Further work observing actual behaviour
or following individuals prospectively might be helpful. The response rate was
moderate despite the use of duplicate mailings, postcard reminders and entry
into a prize draw. Non-respondents to the GHQ-12 are known to have a higher
prevalence of psychiatric morbidity than respondents
(Williams & Macdonald,
1986). Because of the nature of the NHS, general practice
registers in the UK are generally considered to provide adequate population
samples; however, they are known to suffer from `list inflation', whereby
people who have been registered with a general practice can remain registered
after dying or moving away (Carr-Hill &
Roberts, 1999). On average non-responders were 5.5 years younger,
from areas with slightly higher deprivation scores, and were more likely to be
male. These are known associations with population survey non-respondents
(Purdon & Nicolaas, 2003).
However, it is difficult to judge what effects non-response bias might have
had on the findings: for example, internet use is more common in younger
age-groups (over-represented among non-respondents) but also in less deprived
groups (under-represented among non-respondents). For generalisability, it is
reassuring that the prevalence of general internet use is in line with the
findings of other UK population surveys
(Dutton et al,
2005).
Implications
Most people with minor mental health problems seek help from family and
friends rather than professionals (Oliver
et al, 2005). Practitioners and policy makers must also
take note of the role of the internet in help-seeking behaviour. Almost a
third of internet users with a history of psychiatric disorder had used the
internet to seek mental health information. A few respondents had used the
internet for live chat with others about mental health issues and this is an
area likely to see future expansion. As an information source the internet has
advantages of privacy, anonymity and widespread accessibility at low or no
cost (Cline & Haynes,
2001). However, it appears that the public also recognises the
frequently expressed concern of professionals regarding the accuracy of online
information (Christensen & Griffiths,
2000). The internet is mostly unregulated, but there are voluntary
initiatives to encourage quality assessment of health information sites
(Risk & Dzenowagis, 2001;
Griffiths & Christensen,
2005). However, poor-quality information has always existed in
various forms, and there have been only a few isolated case reports of
individuals coming to harm from online information
(Crocco et al, 2002).
The need is for a better understanding of how individuals actually use the
internet, what they do with the information they find and how internet
help-seeking relates to other help-seeking behaviour. By examining the role of
the internet in meeting information needs, psychiatric services and
practitioners could harness the internet as a tool to educate and support
patients. This is particularly important in mental health, where the internet
may have a role in supporting those for whom stigma inhibits help-seeking
through more traditional routes (Berger
et al, 2005).
|
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Baker, L., Wagner, T. H., Singer, S., et al
(2003) Use of the internet and e-mail for health care
information: results from a national survey. JAMA,
289, 2400
-2406.
Berger, M., Wagner, T. H. & Baker, L. C. (2005) Internet use and stigmatized illness. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 1821 -1827.[CrossRef]
Carr-Hill, R. & Roberts, D. (1999)
Population figures for capitation formulas need to be designed differently.
BMJ, 318, 1145
.
Case, D. O. (2002) Looking for Information. A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behaviour. San Diego: Academic Press.
Christensen, H. & Griffiths, K. (2000) The internet and mental health literacy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 34, 975 -979.[CrossRef][Medline]
Christensen, H., Griffiths, K. M. & Jorm, A. F.
(2004) Delivering interventions for depression by using the
internet: randomised controlled trial. BMJ,
328, 265.
Cline, R. J. & Haynes, K. M. (2001)
Consumer health information seeking on the internet: the state of the art.
Health Education Research,
16, 671
-692.
Crocco, A. G., Villasis-Keever, M. & Jadad, A. R.
(2002) Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of
health information on the internet. JAMA,
287, 2869
-2871.
Dutton, W. H., Di Gennaro, C. & Millwood Hargrave, A. (2005) The Internet in Britain: The Oxford Internet Survey (OxIS). Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.
Edwards, P., Roberts, I., Clarke, M., et al
(2002) Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires:
systematic review. BMJ,
324, 1183.
Goldberg, D. P. (1972) The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. London: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, D. P. & Williams, P. (1988) A User's Guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: nferNelson.
Griffiths, K. M. & Christensen, H. (2000)
Quality of web based in formation on treatment of depression: cross sectional
survey. BMJ, 321, 1511
-1515.
Griffiths, K. M. & Christensen, H. (2005) Website quality indicators for consumers. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7, e55 .[Medline]
Griffiths, K. M., Christensen, H., Jorm, A. F., et al
(2004) Effect of web-based depression literacy and
cognitive-behavioural therapy interventions on stigmatising attitudes to
depression: randomised controlled trial. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 185, 342
-349.
McColl, E., Jacoby, A., Thomas, L., et al (2001) Design and use of questionnaires: review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technology Assessment, 5, 31.
Oliver, M. I., Pearson, N., Coe, N., et al
(2005) Help-seeking behaviour in men and women with common
mental health problems: cross-sectional study. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 186, 297
-301.
Pennbridge, J., Moya, R. & Rodrigues, L. (1999) Questionnaire survey of California consumers' use and rating of sources of health care information including the internet.Western Journal of Medicine, 171, 302 -305.[Medline]
Powell, J. & Clarke, A. (2002) The WWW of the World Wide Web: who, what, and why? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 4, e4 .[Medline]
Powell, J., McCarthy, N. & Eysenbach, G. (2003) Cross-sectional survey of users of internet depression communities. BMC Psychiatry, 3, 19.[CrossRef][Medline]
Purdon, S. & Nicolaas, G. (2003) Trends in Non-response on Social Surveys - The Survey Context for the One Number Census. London: National Centre for Social Research.
Risk, A. & Dzenowagis, J. (2001) Review of internet health information quality initiatives. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3, e28 .[Medline]
Williams, P. & Macdonald, A. (1986) The effect of non-response bias on the results of two-stage screening surveys of psychiatric disorder. Social Psychiatry, 21, 182 -186.[Medline]
Received for publication September 21, 2005. Revision received March 20, 2006. Accepted for publication May 2, 2006.
Related articles in BJP:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. J. Kalk and D. D. Pothier Patient information on schizophrenia on the internet Psychiatr. Bull., November 1, 2008; 32(11): 409 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Ferreira-Lay and S. Miller The quality of internet information on depression for lay people Psychiatr. Bull., May 1, 2008; 32(5): 170 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |
