The British Journal of Psychiatry (2006) 189: 390. doi: 10.1192/bjp.189.4.390
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJP
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TYRER, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by TYRER, P.

COLUMNS

PETER TYRER

MORE THAN OUR SHARE OF HAPPINESS

‘The life of man’, famously wrote Thomas Hobbes in 1651 in The Leviathan, ‘is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short’. Although this assertion was disputed at length by many subsequently, there seems little doubt that it was a correct description of the life of those committed to most asylums until well into the 20th century. This legacy continues to give psychiatry a depressing image and the time has now come for some to contemplate what may be described as a happiness makeover. Richard Layard, a health economist and Government spokesman in the House of Lords, the curious second chamber of the UK Houses of Parliament where unelected politicians currently hold much more interesting debates than the elected ones next door, has entered the battle as the Happiness Czar. He wants all of us to have a more positive view towards happiness, and regards it as a state not only worthy of attainment but capable of being achieved with the development of extra psychological treatment resources for the population (Layard, 2006).

So perhaps we should join in the happiness makeover and interpret our publications somewhat differently. If we made a start with this issue we could start with the Gilbody blow ‘people get happier with enhanced care for depression, but it costs’ (pp. 297–308), followed by ‘no dose–response relationship for happiness with SSRIs’ (Ruhé et al, pp. 309–316), ‘mums’ unhappy eating rubs off on the kids’ (Stein et al, pp. 324–329), ‘if you’re happy with your treatment, you’ll stay calm’ (Elbogen et al, pp. 354–360), ‘get positive and improve your quality of life after a heart attack’ (Dickens et al, pp. 367–372), and, a looser interpretation than the authors might have chosen, ‘British only happy when manic’ (Mackin et al, pp. 379–380). So perhaps the move to ‘mental health’ from ‘mental illness’ and ‘recovery’ from ‘rehabilitation’ is not just political correctness; it may reverse Beckian cognitive distortion (see our July issue) and give us a genuine uplift that is more than spin.

RESEARCH IN THE DAILY LIVES OF CLINICIANS

All clinicians, irrespective of specialty, are now much better informed than they were a generation ago. They are less idiosyncratic in their practice, they keep abreast of changes by continuing their medical education long after they have finished training, and they embrace online learning and peer review appraisal so that blind spots are exposed and corrected. But are they as involved in research as they used to be? I think not. When Bernard Shaw stated in The Doctor’s Dilemma that all professions (not just the medical one) ‘were conspiracies against the laity’ he struck a chord in highlighting the preposterous secrecy that pervaded organisations who believed their status would be undermined by disclosure. My worry in psychiatry is that many practitioners have paraphrased Shaw and regard ‘all research workers as conspirators against the patient’. Research is acceptable to clinicians if it is covert or naturalistic (i.e. does not interfere with individual treatment prejudices) or involves data already collected such as diagnosis (Kessing, 2004) or prescriptions (e.g. Helgason et al, 2004), but when it comes to interventions that could provide evidence to change practice everyone becomes decidedly coy. Good randomised controlled trials that can provide definitive evidence of efficacy of any intervention are unlikely to do so if they have fewer than 100 in each treatment arm (Johnson, 1998). In reviewing all those trials we published in 2005 only four, all drug trials (Bradwejn et al, 2005, n=361 (7.2); Kasper et al, 2005, n=358 (8.7); Khanna et al, 2005, n=291 (36.4); Vieta et al, 2005, n=347 (4.6)), satisfied tisfied this requirement. The figures in brackets are the mean number of patients recruited at each centre; these suggest that a tiny fraction of those eligible are taking part. The one exception is the Khanna et al (2005) study that has provoked ethical controversy (Srinavasan et al, 2006); this was the only study not involving recruitment in many countries.

So it seems that if we want to do substantial randomised trials, we have to go international, expect poor returns and recruit from many centres. I do not agree. Psychiatrists have to be more receptive to large studies such as the BALANCE trial, not industry supported, that compares different mood stabilisers in the prophylaxis of bipolar affective disorder (Geddes & Goodwin, 2001). Can clinicians do better? Our service users involved in advising us certainly think so, and their views were reinforced when they heard that of the seven patients recruited to this widely advertised trial in the north-west London area all were recruited by a certain Peter Tyrer in the course of ordinary practice. When the non-participating clinicians ask ‘what’s in it for me?’, we can only reply: ‘Better clinical practice. Do you want it or not?’

REFERENCES

  1. Bradwejn, J., Ahokas, A., Stein, D. J., et al (2005) Venlafaxine extended-release capsules in panic disorder. Flexible-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 187, 352 –359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Geddes, J. & Goodwin, G. (2001) Bipolar disorder: clinical uncertainty, evidence-based medicine and large-scale randomised trials. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 191 –194.[CrossRef]
  3. Helgason, T., Tómasson, H. & Zoëga, T. (2004) Antidepressants and public health in Iceland: time series analysis of national data. British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 157 –162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Johnson, T. (1998) Clinical trials in psychiatry: background and statistical perspective. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 7, 209 –234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kasper, S., Stein, D. J., Loft, H., et al (2005) Escitalopram in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: randomised, placebo-controlled, flexible-dosage dosage study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 186, 222 –226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Khanna, S., Vieta, E., Lyons, B., et al (2005) Risperidone in the treatment of acute mania. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 187, 229 –234[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kessing, L. V. (2004) Severity of depressive episodes according to ICD–10: prediction of risk of relapse and suicide. British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 153 –156.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Layard, R. (2006) The case for psychological treatment centres. BMJ, 332, 1030 –1032.[Free Full Text]
  9. Srinivasan, S., Pai, S. A., Bhan, A., et al (2006) Trial of risperidone in India – concerns (letter). British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, 489.[Free Full Text]
  10. Vieta, E., Bourin, M., Sanchez, R., et al (2005) Effectiveness of aripiprazole v. haloperidol in acute bipolar mania. Double-blind, randomised, comparative 12-week trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 187, 235 –242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related articles in BJP:

Costs and consequences of enhanced primary care for depression: Systematic review of randomised economic evaluations
SIMON GILBODY, PETER BOWER, and PAULA WHITTY
BJP 2006 189: 297-308. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Dose escalation for insufficient response to standard-dose selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in major depressive disorder: Systematic review
HENRICUS G. RUHÉ, JOCHANAN HUYSER, JAN A. SWINKELS, and AART H. SCHENE
BJP 2006 189: 309-316. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Eating habits and attitudes among 10-year-old children of mothers with eating disorders: Longitudinal study
ALAN STEIN, HELEN WOOLLEY, SANDRA COOPER, JONATHAN WINTERBOTTOM, CHRISTOPHER G. FAIRBURN, and MARIO CORTINA-BORJA
BJP 2006 189: 324-329. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Treatment engagement and violence risk in mental disorders
ERIC B. ELBOGEN, RICHARD A. VAN DORN, JEFFREY W. SWANSON, MARVIN S. SWARTZ, and JOHN MONAHAN
BJP 2006 189: 354-360. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Contribution of depression and anxiety to impaired health-related quality of life following first myocardial infarction
C. M. DICKENS, L. McGOWAN, C. PERCIVAL, B. TOMENSON, L. COTTER, A. HEAGERTY, and F. H. CREED
BJP 2006 189: 367-372. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Culture and assessment of manic symptoms
PAUL MACKIN, STEVEN D. TARGUM, AMIR KALALI, DROR ROM, and ALLAN H. YOUNG
BJP 2006 189: 379-380. [Abstract] [Full Text]  



eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Politically Correct
Harold A. Maio, et al.
BJP Online, 2 Oct 2006 [Full text]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJP
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TYRER, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by TYRER, P.