The British Journal of Psychiatry (2006) 189: 564. doi: 10.1192/bjp.189.6.564
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Muirithe, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O’Muirithe, B.

Correspondence

Mental health and incapacity legislation

B. O’Muirithe

Carrick Community Mental Health Team, 27 Pydar Street, Truro TR1 2SS, UK

Correspondence: Email: Barra.Omuirithe{at}cpt.cornwall.nhs.uk

EDITED BY KIRIAKOS XENITIDIS and COLIN CAMPBELL

The laudable aim of Dawson & Szmukler (2006) of eliminating discrimination against those with mental illness by a fusion of mental health and incapacity legislation may not be achievable with their proposals. They address the ethical difficulties of treating ‘patients with fluctuating mental conditions who temporarily regain their capacity after medication, and again refuse necessary treatment’. They suggest that ‘where the patient has been treated involuntarily on several occasions with a positive response, and a sustained course of treatment is again considered necessary, sustained resumption of capacity on the part of the patient might be required for the patient’s refusal to be honoured’.

In my opinion this highlights two issues. First the authors fail in their aim to stop the discrimination against patients with mental illness who retain capacity. In their proposed legislation they suggest permitting the coercive treatment of patients with mental illness despite the presence of capacity but decry this principle in the Mental Health Act 1983. Second their proposal of using a past history of successful coercive treatment to allow further treatment is unworkable. It is impossible to implement for new patients as no previous history of successful treatment can be demonstrated.

REFERENCES

  1. Dawson, J. & Szmukler, G. (2006) Fusion of mental health and incapacity legislation. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, 504 –509.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Muirithe, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O’Muirithe, B.