The British Journal of Psychiatry (2007) 190: 181. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.024232
© 2007 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
R. D. Laing: Contemporary Perspectives
Matthew Broome
Section of Neuroimaging, Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of
Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK
Correspondence:
Email:
m.broome{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk
Edited by Salman Raschid. Free Association Books. 2005. 325pp. £18.95
(pb). ISBN 1853437018
As a sixth-former I was an avid listener to Anthony Clares Radio 4
programme In the Psychiatrists Chair. Of the interviews
Clare conducted, two continue to stick in my mind: one with Jimmy Savile, the
other with R. D. Laing. The image with which Clare left me was that of Laing
as a rather romantic, yet tragic individual. Raschids edited volume on
Laing both reinforced and modified this impression. The volume is divided into
three sections: introduction, ideas and therapy, with the second section the
longest and, for me, the most worthwhile. The papers are largely either
original contributions or derive from the R. D. Laing conferences, organised
under the auspices of the Philosophy Special Interest Group of the Royal
College of Psychiatrists. There are some papers that deal less directly with
the work of Laing: the contributions of Fuchs, Sass and Matthews in particular
serve, from different perspectives, as lucid and clear introductions to
phenomenology and the philosophy of psychiatry. What is refreshing is that the
contributors who engage directly with Laings thought and influence are
not unquestioning, bedazzled disciples. Many of the papers are critical of
Laings views on mental illness, psychotherapy, politics and his use and
understanding of philosophy. There was a tendency, particularly in Laing
post-Divided Self, to romanticise mental illness. This was combined
with an aspiration towards transcendence and otherwordliness. The book
achieved one very important thing for me personally: it shifted the image of
the tormented Laing as interviewed by Clare and replaced it with that of the
young army psychiatrist spending hours trying to interview and understand the
distressed soldiers under his care. This is the Laing I am left in full
admiration of. The tragedy is not so much that of Laings own personal
life but rather his own seeming loss of this immediate prereflective ability
to be with and understand people in distress. One could interpret his later
work as an attempt to reify, in an increasingly esoteric fashion, that which
once came so easily.
There are a few pedantic criticisms of the book. The same point is repeated
by different authors in different papers leading to some degree of repetition,
not all works cited in the text are referenced and there is no index. Many
contributors to the volume also offer an incorrect or simplistic
interpretation of Jaspers views on understanding those with mental
illness. I would still recommend to medical students and trainee mental health
clinicians The Divided Self as an account of engaging with those with
mental illness and am grateful to R. D. Laing: Contemporary
Perspectives for reminding us of the passion of Captain Laing.
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- R.D. Laing and long-stay patients
- David Abrahamson
- BJP Online, 8 Feb 2007
[Full text]
- Reply to Abrahamson
- Matthew R Broome
- BJP Online, 28 Mar 2007
[Full text]