REVIEW ARTICLES |
Center for Psychological Trauma, Department of Psychiatry and Academic Medical Center de Meren, University of Amsterdam
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam
Center for Psychological Trauma, Department of Psychiatry and Academic Medical Center de Meren, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Correspondence: Marie-Louise Meewisse, Center for Psychological Trauma, Academic Medical Center de Meren, Department of Psychiatry, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 5,1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Email: M.L.Meewisse{at}amc.uva.nl
* This paper was presented at the International Society for Traumatic Stress
Studies conference, Hollywood 4–7 November, 2006, and at the European
Conference on Traumatic Stress, Opatija, 5–9 June, 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
Aims To compare basal cortisol levels in adults with current PTSD and in people without psychiatric disorder.
Method Systematic review and meta-analysis. Standardised mean differences (SMD) in basal cortisol levels were calculated and random-effects models using inverse variance weighting were applied.
Results Across 37 studies, 828 people with PTSD and 800 controls did not differ in cortisol levels (pooled SMD=–0.12, 95% CI=–0.32 to 0.080). Subgroup analyses revealed that studies assessing plasma or serum showed significantly lower levels in people with PTSD than in controls not exposed to trauma. Lower levels were also found in people with PTSD when females were included, in studies on physical or sexual abuse, and in afternoon samples.
Conclusions Low cortisol levels in PTSD are only found under certain conditions. Future research should elucidate whether low cortisol is related to gender or abuse and depends on the measurement methods used.
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inclusion criteria
Studies were included when cortisol was measured in adults (aged 18 and
above) with current PTSD and in controls with no current Axis I disorder
(according to DSM–III, DSM–III–R, or DSM–IV criteria;
American Psychiatric Association,
1980,
1987,
1994) or history of PTSD.
Cortisol levels had to be determined with a standard biological assay.
Furthermore, mean cortisol levels and standard deviations (s.d.) for both
groups had to be described or had to be presented by the authors upon request.
In the case of multiple papers from a single study, only the results of the
publication with the highest number of participants was included.
Exclusion criteria
Studies were excluded when: (a) focusing on a condition other than
depression co-morbid with PTSD (e.g. borderline personality disorder, cancer);
(b) reporting on lifetime, 12-month diagnosis of PTSD or sub-threshold/partial
PTSD; (c) cortisol level was measured within 1 month of trauma; (d) the HPA
axis was pharmacologically challenged (e.g. by dexamethasone) before first
cortisol measurement; (e) participants were anticipating any kind of social
stressor, such as cognitive stress challenge, combat noise or personalised
trauma script; (f) reporting in a language other than English. M.M and G.V.
independently assessed each retrieved study and disagreements with respect to
inclusion were resolved through discussion with M.O.
Data analysis
For each individual study identified, we calculated the standardised mean
difference (SMD) in cortisol levels between the PTSD and the control group and
its associated variance. Hedges adjusted g was used to give a
better estimate in cases of smaller sample sizes (Rosenthal et al,
1994). Random-effects models were fitted using inverse variance weighting to
obtain pooled estimates of SMD and its corresponding 95% CI.
In all analyses, we used the SMD as our outcome measure to allow pooling across studies that used different types of measurement (i.e. urine, saliva, plasma, or serum) and to reduce the impact of measurement problems related to different sampling conditions.
Our first analysis included the data from all studies to obtain an overall pooled estimate and to examine whether there was heterogeneity in results between studies. Each study was included only once in this overall analysis. If a study reported multiple types and times of measurements, the following hierarchy was used to select one measurement. Plasma samples were preferred above saliva, saliva above urine, and morning measurement above afternoon or evening. We used data from the earliest sample, or when measurements were related to time of awakening we selected the sample 30 min past awakening to be closest to the peak level of cortisol in the morning. For afternoon samples, we included the latest possible sample to compare circadian curves at the nadir of cortisol values. The Q-test was performed to examine whether there was more heterogeneity in the results than could be expected from chance alone. We also calculated the I2 statistic, which expresses the percentage of total variation that can be attributed to heterogeneity rather than chance. Within this data-set, we also examined whether there were systematic differences between the types of measurement.
We then performed several specific subgroup analyses to examine whether the difference in cortisol levels between PTSD and control groups was influenced by other factors. Successive models were built to examine whether the SMD was significantly different in subgroups defined by a particular factor. The following factors were examined: time of measurement; gender; characteristics of the PTSD group, including type of trauma, years elapsed since trauma, presence or absence of comorbid depression; whether or not the control group was also exposed to trauma; and year of publication. Results of the subgroup analysis are presented as mean SMD together with 95% CI for each level of the factor. In addition, a formal test of interaction (e.g. whether the differences in SMD between the levels of the factor are zero) was performed to avoid overinterpretation of effects found in subgroups (Matthews & Altman, 1996; Altman & Bland, 2003).
The MIXED procedure in SAS version 9.1 for Windows was used to fit the various random-effects models as described by van Houwelingen et al (2002). P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
|
|
|---|
A total of 1628 people were included across all studies, with 828 with PTSD and 800 controls. The median sample size of the studies was 20 for people with PTSD (range 7–75) and 18 for controls (range 7–113).
Study characteristics
Each study included in the meta-analysis and the assessed variables are
shown in a data supplement to the online version of this paper. Cortisol was
either assessed in plasma/serum (24 studies), saliva (8), or 24 h urinary free
cortisol samples (7), or a combination of two types of assessment. In 7
studies, both trauma-exposed and non-exposed controls were used as comparison
groups, whereas comparison solely with traumatised or non-traumatised controls
was made in 9 and 8 studies respectively. In the remaining 13 studies
trauma-exposed and non-exposed individuals were combined or left undefined in
the comparison group. Studies reported on the following populations: combat
veterans (18 studies), victims of (childhood) sexual or physical abuse (6),
refugees (3), and various trauma (8). Two studies did not report information
about the types of trauma in their population. Twenty-four studies matched
their participants with PTSD and controls for gender and 8 studies matched
them for age. Few studies matched their participants for other criteria such
as smoking, race or menstrual cycle. Potential confounding factors such as
medication usage, exclusion criteria and dietary restrictions varied greatly
across studies (see data supplement to online version of this paper).
Overall comparison
Figure 1 shows a forest plot
of the SMD of cortisol levels in people with PTSD relative to controls in each
of the 37 studies, grouped according to the type of measurement. There was no
overall difference in pooled effect size between people with PTSD and controls
(SMD=–0.12, 95% CI –0.32 to 0.080, P=0.24). There was
significant heterogeneity in results between studies: the P-value for
the Q-test for heterogeneity beyond chance was 0.0001 and
I2 was 71% (indicating that 71% of variation across
studies can be attributed to heterogeneity rather than chance). In the
situation that all studies were measuring the same SMD, only sampling
variation would be present and I2 would be zero
(Higgins et al,
2003).
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide] |
Fig. 1 Standardised mean difference (with 95% CI) of cortisol levels between
people with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and controls (n=37
studies). Studies are grouped according to type of measurement and are
identified by first-named author. Pooled estimate based on random-effects
model using inverse variance weighting.
|
Subgroup analyses
All the following subgroup analyses were performed with studies measuring
cortisol in plasma/serum. The small numbers of studies measuring cortisol in
saliva and urine prohibited any meaningful subgroup analysis.
Time of measurement
In this analysis we grouped studies according to whether measurements were
taken between 08.00 and 09.00 h or in the afternoon. No differences were found
for morning samples (n=15 studies, SMD=–0.0006, 95% CI
–0.53 to 0.53, P=0.998), whereas in the afternoon people with
PTSD had lower levels of cortisol than controls (n=7 studies,
SMD=–0.79, 95% CI –1.58 to–0.003, P=0.049).
However, the formal test for interaction did not reach significance, so the
observed effect in the afternoon subgroup should be interpreted with caution
(Fig. 2).
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide] |
Fig. 2 Influence of variables on plasma/serum cortisol assessments. Standardised
mean difference (with 95% CI) of plasma/serum cortisol levels between people
with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and controls.
|
Type of trauma
Four categories were used to examine whether type of trauma might have
influenced the association between PTSD and cortisol: war veterans, victims of
sexual or physical abuse, refugees and various trauma
(Fig. 2). Subgroup analysis
revealed significantly lower cortisol levels in people with PTSD due to sexual
or physical abuse than in controls (n=5 studies, SMD=–0.55, 95%
CI –0.89 to –0.21, P=0.002). No differences in cortisol
level were found between controls and people with PTSD due to other types of
trauma (war veterans, n=12 studies, SMD=0.15, 95% CI –0.03 to
0.34, P=0.12; refugees, n=2, SMD= –0.17, 95% CI
–0.63 to 0.29, P=0.46; various trauma, n=3,
SMD=–0.11, 95% CI –0.52 to 0.31, P=0.61). Analysis also
revealed a significant interaction between types of trauma (n=22,
F=4.31, d.f.=3, 1000, P=0.005).
Years since trauma
To analyse whether the number of years elapsed since the traumatic event
was related to cortisol levels, we constructed three time categories:
0–10 years, 11–20 years and over 20 years. In studies where there
were no such data, we approximated this time frame by using the duration of
illness. For studies examining people with childhood abuse, we subtracted 12
years from their mean age. For those with war-related trauma we subtracted the
year of study publication from the year in which that particular war ended.
Among studies with the same time frame for years since trauma no differences
were found for cortisol levels of people with PTSD and controls (0–10
years, n=8 studies, SMD=0.19, 95% CI –0.11 to 0.49,
P=0.21; 11–20 years, n=2, SMD=0.52, 95% CI
–0.058 to 1.09, P=0.078; >20 years, n=9,
SMD=–0.19, 95% CI –0.44 to 0.071, P=0.16).
Exposure to trauma of control groups
To differentiate between exposure to trauma and exposure with subsequent
development of PTSD, we analysed studies which indicated whether controls had
previous exposure to trauma. In 17 studies we calculated effect sizes for PTSD
compared with trauma-exposed controls and non-exposed controls separately.
Lower cortisol levels were found for people with PTSD compared with
non-exposed controls (n=11 studies, SMD=–0.35, 95% CI
–0.61 to–0.098, P=0.007). No differences were found
between people with PTSD and trauma-exposed controls (n=9, SMD=0.096,
95% CI –0.16 to 0.35, P=0.46). The test of interaction was also
significant (n=20, F=5.93, d.f.=1, 1000,
P=0.015).
Comorbid depression
The effect of comorbid depression in people with PTSD on cortisol level was
analysed in 13 studies that reported whether depression was present or absent
within their PTSD group. If a single study used two subgroups with PTSD, with
and without comorbid depression, we included both comparisons in the analysis
(2 studies). The results (see Fig.
2) showed that depression had no influence on the effect
sizes.
Year of publication
Year of publication was examined to evaluate whether improved methodology
might strengthen possible contrasts between groups. Using all published
studies, year of publication was linearly modelled to estimate the change in
SMD per year. Figure 2 shows
the effect on SMD over a 10-year period (1994–2004). Results could not
confirm this hypothesis.
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Time of assessment
Since cortisol has a circadian rhythm, with low values at awakening,
followed by peak values 30 min after awakening and a steady decline during the
rest of the day, time of assessment is expected to be an important factor in
its measurement. Our findings revealed that during the afternoon, people with
PTSD had significantly lower cortisol levels than controls. No such
differences were found during the early morning. Since PTSD is known to be
associated with difficulties in sleeping, and measures depended on fixed
times, it is uncertain whether variability in awakening time between PTSD and
controls influenced morning cortisol levels. Since cortisol secretion is
relatively stable during the afternoon actual differences can be detected more
easily.
Trauma-exposed v. non-exposed control groups
Some of the disparity in study results can be explained by whether studies
used trauma-exposed or non-exposed controls. We found significantly lower
plasma/serum cortisol levels in people with PTSD compared with controls not
exposed to trauma but no such difference when comparisons were made with
trauma-exposed controls. This suggests that differences in cortisol levels
relate to being exposed to trauma generally rather than to PTSD.
Gender
In general, women appear to have a more sensitised HPA axis with lower
overall plasma cortisol than men (Van
Cauter et al, 1996), and our findings indicated that
females with PTSD showed lower levels of basal cortisol than female controls.
No such difference was apparent between males. This may explain why women are
more vulnerable than men to the development of post-trauma symptoms and take
longer to recover from them. In addition, the higher risk of PTSD in women may
be due, at least in part, to the types of traumas they experience (more
interpersonal violence, particularly of a sexual nature), to higher
peri-traumatic dissociation in women, or to womens use of avoidant
coping strategies (Olff et al,
2007). Gender-specific PTSD subgroups may exist – in
particular arousal-related and dissociation-related variants – with
distinct neuropsychological profiles and attendant symptoms. Hence,
gender-specific psychobiological reactions to trauma may contribute to the
higher risk for PTSD.
Physical or sexual abuse and years since trauma
Only people with PTSD due to physical or sexual abuse had lower cortisol
levels than controls. This type of trauma is generally chronic and often
starts in early development. An upbringing that is associated with adversity
can produce detrimental effects on health
(Fish et al, 2004)
and it is likely that within a critical phase during development, functioning
of the HPA axis alters. Years elapsed since trauma had no pronounced influence
on cortisol levels of people with PTSD. The time of onset of PTSD in
development and the ongoing traumatising character of abuse might be more
crucial in distinguishing abuse-related PTSD from other types of trauma. It
should be noted that for statistical analyses we could not disentangle female
gender from victims of abuse because of overlap in studies. Therefore, we
could not examine whether low cortisol levels found in women with PTSD are due
to gender or type of trauma preceding PTSD, or an interaction of both.
Comorbid depression
Comorbid depression in people with PTSD had no influence on the association
between PTSD and cortisol level. Although there seems to be consensus that
people with depression demonstrate high cortisol levels
(Holsboer, 2001), generally
this hyperactivation of the HPA axis is typically found in severe depression
not specifically due to traumatic stress. In accordance with our findings,
PTSD and comorbid PTSD/depression following traumatic injury were
indistinguishable and reflected a shared vulnerability with a range of similar
predictive non-biological variables. Comorbid PTSD/depression and PTSD alone
may reflect one and the same construct
(ODonnell et al,
2004), as appears to be confirmed by similar cortisol values
within the present study.
Year of publication/sensitivity of assays
We also examined whether year of publication affected the relationship
between PTSD and cortisol. This variable was included in our subgroup analysis
to serve as a proxy for changes in protocol or the use of more sensitive
assays during the study period. Year of publication had no impact on the
results and therefore did not explain any of the heterogeneity in results
across studies.
Limitations and future research
We acknowledge several limitations of our meta-analyses. First, despite our
efforts to include unpublished studies, publication bias might still have
obscured our results, as studies which find significant differences are more
likely to be published. Second, we performed several subgroup analyses based
on characteristics of the PTSD or control group and used these as study-level
covariates in our model. Owing to incomplete reporting, we could not use all
studies in the subgroup analyses. In some cases, only a few studies were
available within a specific stratum, which caused problems related to chance
findings and lack of power. Subgroup analyses within systematic reviews have
to be interpreted with care because by nature they are post hoc
analyses. They can provide additional insight but have to be confirmed in
well-designed prospective studies with sufficient power to examine differences
in effect by subgroups. Furthermore, individual appraisal and coping
mechanisms are crucial in determining levels of stress hormones such as
cortisol (Olff et al,
2005a,b),
factors that have not been systematically assessed in most of the literature.
Finally, substantial differences in the methodology of studies hampered
comparison. For instance, restrictions regarding smoking, alcohol, drugs and
medication usage varied widely across studies. Although we attempted to pool
data of studies on important characteristics, these restrictions and comorbid
conditions known to confound cortisol levels remained unattended.
In future studies consensus in data collection and sampling protocol of basal diurnal cortisol would facilitate comparison of data across studies. Given that saliva samples can be obtained by study participants themselves in their own environment and related to time of awakening and that salivary cortisol consists completely of the bioactive fraction, future studies could overcome several difficulties by sampling salivary cortisol.
In summary, across 37 studies people with PTSD and healthy controls did not differ in cortisol levels. Nevertheless, support was found for low cortisol levels dependent on the type of control group and specific subpopulations. Significantly lower cortisol levels were found in people with PTSD when compared with non-exposed controls, whereas no such differences were found when compared with trauma-exposed controls without PTSD. Subgroup analyses further revealed lower cortisol in people who seem to be at the greatest risk for developing PTSD, i.e. women and physically or sexually abused victims. The lower cortisol values in PTSD found in the afternoon endorse the need to choose the time of measurement carefully. It is important to note that numerous factors – which are frequently overlooked – may have a confounding influence on cortisol levels. Therefore, disentangling the relationship between PTSD and cortisol is more complex than it first appears.
|
|
|---|
Related articles in BJP:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. M. Prager and L. R. Johnson Stress at the Synapse: Signal Transduction Mechanisms of Adrenal Steroids at Neuronal Membranes Sci. Signal., September 1, 2009; 2(86): re5 - re5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Burgmer, M. Gaubitz, C. Konrad, M. Wrenger, S. Hilgart, G. Heuft, and B. Pfleiderer Decreased Gray Matter Volumes in the Cingulo-Frontal Cortex and the Amygdala in Patients With Fibromyalgia Psychosom Med, June 1, 2009; 71(5): 566 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. de Zulueta Post-traumatic stress disorder and attachment: possible links with borderline personality disorder Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., May 1, 2009; 15(3): 172 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||