Psychiatric Outpatient Department, University Hospital Basel, Basel,
Switzerland
Department of Psychiatry, Section of Neuroimaging, Institute of
Psychiatry, London, UK
Psychiatric Outpatient Department, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Department of Psychiatry, Section of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
Psychiatric Outpatient Department, University Hospital Basel
Neuroradiological Department, University Hospital Basel
Psychiatric Outpatient Department, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
Correspondence: Professor Anita Riecher-Rössler, Psychiatric Outpatient Department, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland. Email: ariecher{at}uhbs.ch
Declaration of interest None. See Acknowledgements for details of funding.
|
|
|---|
Aims To assess regional grey matter volume in the at-risk individuals who subsequently developed psychosis.
Method Magnetic resonance imaging data from at-risk individuals who developed psychosis (n=12) within the following 25 months were compared with data from healthy volunteers (n=22) and people with first-episode psychosis (n=25).
Results Compared with healthy volunteers, individuals who subsequently developed psychosis had smaller grey matter volume in the posterior cingulate gyrus, precuneus, and paracentral lobule bilaterally and in the left superior parietal lobule, and greater grey matter volumein a left parietal/posterior temporal region. Compared with first-episode patients, they had relatively greater grey matter volume in the temporal gyrus bilaterally and smaller grey matter volume in the right lentiform nucleus.
Conclusions Some of the structural brain abnormalities in individuals with an at-risk mental state may be related to an increased vulnerability to psychosis, while others are associated with the development of a psychotic illness.
|
|
|---|
We have previously studied the group with an at-risk mental state as a whole (Borgwardt et al, 2006, 2007) but this group is very heterogeneous, with many of the patients not yet having developed psychosis. In the present study, regional grey matter volume in individuals with an at-risk mental state who later developed psychosis was compared with healthy controls and patients with first-episode psychosis using a voxel-based morphometric approach. We aimed to identify those brain abnormalities in subjects who later developed psychosis that were already present before the psychosis emerged as opposed to merely being secondary consequences of psychosis. Based on what is known about the timing of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities in psychosis, we hypothesised that the participants with at-risk mental state who later developed psychosis would show brain abnormalities in insula and temporal and cingulate cortex relative to controls. We further hypothesised that these abnormalities would be qualitatively, but not yet quantitatively similar to those seen in patients with first-episode psychosis.
|
|
|---|
The FEPSY study (Riecher-Rössler et al, 2006, 2007) is an open, prospective study aimed at identifying and investigating individuals at risk of psychosis, and patients experiencing a first psychotic episode. Each individual identified as being at risk for psychosis by a screening procedure was thoroughly examined using a multi-level approach including structural neuroimaging and electrophysiological and cognitive investigations covering potential predictors of schizophrenia. All individuals with at-risk mental state have been followed up over 5 years. The study seeks a validation of the postulated risk factors and indicators for beginning psychosis by comparing those subjects who in fact developed manifest psychosis during follow-up with those who did not. All aspects (including the neuroimaging part presented here) of the study were approved by the local ethics committee of the University of Basel and written informed consent was obtained from each participant.
Here, we included 12 participants with an at-risk mental state who had developed psychosis in the follow-up period, and compared them with 22 healthy matched volunteers and 25 patients with first-episode psychosis. Participants were included in the current analysis if they agreed to an MRI scan and if the MRI sequences were of adequate quality.
Screening procedure
For screening purposes, we developed the Basel Screening Instrument for
Psychosis (BSIP), a 46-item checklist based on variables which have been shown
to be predictors of psychosis (Riecher
et al, 1990;
Häfner et al,
1991; Riecher-Rössler et al,
2006,
2007) such as
DSM–III–R prodromal symptoms, social decline, drug
abuse, previous psychiatric disorders or genetic liability for psychosis (see
Table 1). It is used in
combination with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) to assess the
severity of (pre-)psychotic phenomena. The BSIP was constructed as a screening
checklist to identify those at risk and is followed by a more extensive early
detection interview (details available from author on request) in a next
assessment step. All assessments were conducted by experienced psychiatrists
who undergo regular training.
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 1 Domains of the Basel Screening Instrument for Psychosis (BSIP) |
Inclusion criteria for individuals with an at-risk mental state, patients with a first-episode and healthy volunteers
At-risk mental state transition group. The at-risk mental state
group was defined using criteria corresponding to the Personal Assessment and
Crisis Evaluation (PACE) criteria (Yung
et al, 1998) employed in previous MRI studies of patients
with an at-risk mental state (Phillips
et al, 2002; Pantelis
et al, 2003). Inclusion thus required one or more of the
following: (a) attenuated psychotic-like symptoms, (b) brief
limited intermittent psychotic symptoms (BLIPS), or (c) a first- or
second-degree relative with a psychotic disorder plus at least two further
risk factors according to the screening instrument such as a marked decline in
social or occupational functioning. Inclusion because of attenuated psychotic
symptoms required scores of 2 or 3 on the hallucination item, or 3 or 4 on the
unusual thought content or suspiciousness items of the BPRS at least several
times a week and persisting for more than 1 week. Inclusion because of BLIPS
required scores of 4 or above on the hallucination item, or 5 or above on the
unusual thought content, suspiciousness or conceptual disorganisation items of
the BPRS, with each symptom lasting less than 1 week before resolving
spontaneously.
First-episode group. The first-episode group was defined as participants who met the operational criteria for first episode psychosis described by Yung et al (Yung et al, 1998), again as used to define first episode psychosis in the previous MRI studies of the ARMS (Phillips et al, 2002; Pantelis et al, 2003). Inclusion required scores of 4 or above on the hallucination item, or 5 or above on the unusual thought content, suspiciousness or conceptual disorganisation items of the BPRS. The symptoms must have occurred at least several times a week and persisted for more than 1 week.
Control group. Healthy volunteers were recruited from the same geographical area as the other groups through local advertisements. These individuals had no current psychiatric disorder, no history of psychiatric illness, head trauma, neurological illness, serious medical or surgical illness, substance dependency, and no family history of any psychiatric disorder as assessed by an experienced psychiatrist in a detailed clinical interview.
Exclusion criteria
Age <18 years, insufficient knowledge of German, IQ <70, previous
episode of schizophrenic psychosis (treated with major tranquillisers for more
than 3 weeks), psychosis clearly due to organic factors or substance
dependency, or psychotic symptoms within a clearly diagnosed affective
psychosis or borderline personality disorder.
Clinical follow-up and transition to psychosis
All subjects were offered supportive counselling and clinical management.
Transition to psychosis was monitored by means of the transition criteria of
Yung et al (1998).
During the first year of follow-up, individuals with an at-risk mental state
were assessed monthly. During the second and third years, all individuals were
assessed 3-monthly and thereafter once a year. The diagnosis was determined by
a diagnostic interview using ICD–10 research criteria
(World Health Organization,
1992) at the time of transition, then corroborated by a subsequent
assessment at least 1 year post-transition using the Operational Criteria
(OPCRIT) checklist for psychotic and affective illness.
Structural magnetic resonance imaging
Acquisition of magnetic resonance imaging data
Participants were scanned using a Siemens (Erlangen, Germany) Magnetom
Vision 1.5 T scanner at the University Hospital Basel. Head movement was
minimised by foam padding and velcro straps across the forehead and chin. A
3-D volumetric spoiled gradient recalled echo sequence generated 176
contiguous, 1 mm thick sagittal slices. Imaging parameters were: time-to-echo,
4 ms; time-to-repetition, 9.7 ms; flip angle, 12; matrix size, 200 x
256; field of view, 25.6 x 25.6 cm matrix; voxel dimensions, 1.28
x 1 x 1 mm.
Analysis of grey matter volume
Image pre-processing. Optimised voxel-based morphometry
pre-processing was performed with Statistical Parametric Mapping software
(SPM2; Wellcome Department of Imaging Neurosciences, University College
London). The image processing steps have been described in detail elsewhere
(Ashburner & Friston, 2000;
Good et al, 2001). The
segmentation algorithm implemented in SPM incorporates an a priori
knowledge of the likely spatial distribution of tissue types in the brain with
prior probability tissue maps derived from a large number of individuals. To
ensure the most accurate segmentation possible, we created study-specific
customised prior probability maps used in a previous study
(Borgwardt et al,
2007). The pre-processing stages were as follows: (a) scans were
segmented into probabilistic maps of grey and white matter and cerebrospinal
fluid with a modified mixture model clustering algorithm; (b) the segmented
grey matter map was mapped to a grey matter template, and the derived warping
parameters were applied to the original T1-weighted image to map it into
standard space (this procedure prevents skull and other non-brain voxels from
contributing to the registration, while avoiding the need for explicit
skull-stripping); (c) the registered image was then re-segmented, which is
necessary because the a priori knowledge incorporated into the SPM2
segmentation algorithm means that it works optimally on images in standard
space. The segmented maps were then modulated through multiplying voxel values
by the Jacobian determinants from the spatial normalisation to correct for
volume changes. Finally, all normalised, segmented, modulated grey matter
tissue maps were smoothed with a Gaussian filter of 5 mm full width at half
maximum (FWHM).
Statistical analysis of magnetic resonance imaging data
Using x-BAMM (Brain Activation and Morphological Mapping, version 2.5,
http://www-bmu.psychiatry.cam.ac.uk/software/),
between-group differences in grey matter volume were estimated by fitting an
analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model at each intracerebral voxel in standard
space, covarying for total grey matter volume and age at scan. Given that
structural brain changes are likely to extend over a number of contiguous
voxels, test statistics incorporating spatial information, such as 3-D cluster
mass (the sum of supra-threshold voxel statistics), are generally more
powerful than other possible test statistics, which are informed only by data
at a single voxel. Therefore, our approach was to initially set a relatively
lenient P value (P
0.05) to detect voxels putatively
demonstrating differences between groups. We then searched for spatial
clusters of such voxels and tested the cluster mass of each cluster.
Permutation testing was used to assess statistical significance at both the
voxel and cluster levels. At the cluster level, we set the statistical
threshold for cluster significance for each analysis such that the expected
number of false positive clusters was
1, and quote the P value at
which this occurred. The principal advantages of cluster-level testing are
that it confers greater sensitivity by incorporating information from more
than one voxel in the test statistic and also substantially reduces the search
volume or number of tests required for a whole brain analysis, thereby
mitigating the multiple comparisons problem. We did a three-group comparison
(at-risk mental state-T v. first-episode v. control) to look
for overall effects between the groups and two-group comparisons for specific
between-group differences.
Significant clusters were anatomically localised using the atlas of Talairach & Tournoux (1988), except for foci in and close to the cerebellum, which were localised using the atlas of Schmahmann et al (1999).
Statistical analysis of demographic data
Clinical and socio-demographic differences between groups were examined
using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), t-test, or
2 test. Statistical analyses were performed with the
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 12.0 for
Windows).
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 2 Sample characteristics of the individuals with at-risk mental state who developed a psychosis, patients with first-episode psychosis and controls |
Grey matter abnormalities
Three-group comparison
Over all groups, there were significant between-group differences in grey
matter volume including two main regions: (a) the left superior and middle
temporal gyrus, the adjacent part of the left insula as well as the inferior
parietal lobule, the postcentral and fusiform gyrus, and (b) the right middle
and inferior temporal gyrus (Table
3, see Fig. DS1 in the online data supplement to this paper,
P=0.002). Post-hoc testing revealed that in both these regions, the
volume in the at-risk mental state–transition group was significantly
larger than that in the first-episode group but was not significantly
different from that in the control group.
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 3 Regions where grey matter volume differed between subjects with an at-risk mental state who developed psychosis, patients with first-episode psychosis and controls1 |
At a less stringent statistical threshold (P=0.01) there were additional differences in region spanning the right insula and superior temporal gyrus coordinates of cluster centroids x=34.5, y=8.8, z=12.0), in the posterior cingulate gyrus (–0.1, –66.6, 10.6) and in the cerebellum (–7.9, –48.9, –35.9 and 7.8, –46.0, –36.0) bilaterally.
When repeating the same analysis without the subjects on antipsychotic medication, the results did not change.
At-risk mental state–transition v. control
To further clarify the nature of the abnormalities in the at-risk mental
state–transition group we then compared them with controls directly.
There was an area of smaller grey matter volume in a midline region that
included the posterior cingulate gyrus, precuneus, and paracentral lobule
bilaterally and extended into the left superior parietal lobule
(Table 4, see Fig. DS2,
P=0.002).
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 4 Regions where grey matter volume differed between subjects who developed psychosis and controls1 |
At the same time the at-risk mental state–transition group had a relatively greater grey matter volume compared with the healthy controls in a left parietal/posterior temporal region that included the left supramarginal and angular gyri and inferior parietal lobule, plus the posterior portions of the superior and middle temporal gyri (Table 4, P=0.002).
At a less stringent statistical threshold (P=0.01) there were additional areas of smaller grey matter volume in a region spanning the right insula (39.6, 7.5, –0.6), the superior (46.6, 2.9, –12.0) and middle temporal gyrus (41.9, 0.9, –20.0) and the inferior frontal gyrus (35.9, 22.5, 4.0), and in a region spanning the anterior cingulate (–0.3, 37.4, 24.0) and the medial frontal gyrus (–0.5, 36.3, 31.3). Furthermore, there were additional areas of relatively greater grey matter volume as compared to controls in the right parahippocampal gyrus (22.2, –29.7, –8.6) and in a region that included the right supramarginal (55.4, –52.5, 24.0) and inferior temporal gyrus (59.0, –53.3, –4.2).
At-risk mental state–transition v. first-episode
To test our second hypothesis, the at-risk mental state–transition
subgroup was also compared with the first-episode group. In fact, no
significant differences in regional grey matter volume were found at a very
stringent statistical threshold (P=0.002). At a less stringent
statistical threshold (P=0.01), relative to patients with
first-episode, participants with an at-risk mental state who developed
psychosis had areas of relatively more grey matter volume in a region spanning
the superior, middle and inferior temporal gyrus bilaterally. There was also a
region of smaller grey matter volume in the right lentiform nucleus
(Table 5, see Fig. DS3).
|
View this table: [in a new window] | Table 5 Regions where grey matter volume differed between subjects who developed psychosis and first-episode patients (P=0.01) |
When the analysis was repeated after excluding the participants on antipsychotic medication, the same regions showed significant differences.
|
|
|---|
Our second hypothesis was that the subjects who went on to psychosis would show neuroanatomical differences qualitatively but not yet quantitatively similar to patients with first-episode psychosis. However, we found that individuals with an at-risk mental state who developed psychosis showed larger grey matter volumes in the temporal lobe bilaterally relative to patients with first-episode psychosis. This finding is suggestive that temporal lobe grey matter abnormalities seem to occur later in the time course of the illness and may be associated with the subsequent transition to psychosis.
Despite a large body of neuroimaging studies in schizophrenia showing multiple subtle brain abnormalities, we do not know the exact time course of their occurrence. Meta-analytic reviews have largely been conducted on samples of patients with chronic schizophrenia, and these indicate that these patients compared with healthy controls show reduced brain size, enlarged lateral and third ventricles, reduced frontal lobe volume, reduced volumes of temporolimbic structures and of corpus callosum, and increased volume of basal ganglia (for a review a review see Vita et al, 2006). The review by Vita et al (2006) showed that some of these abnormalities, such as those in the lateral and third ventricle, hippocampus and for whole brain volume are already present in patients with first-episode psychosis. Longitudinal MRI studies in first-episode psychosis suggest that brain changes are progressive, in particular in the initial couple of years of the illness and are associated with functional outcome (Keshavan et al, 2005).
Neuroimaging studies of individuals without psychosis who are at risk of psychosis could demonstrate that neuroanatomical abnormalities are also evident in first-degree relatives and healthy co-twins of patients with schizophrenia (Lawrie et al, 1999; Seidman et al, 1999; Staal et al, 2000; Baare et al, 2001; Hulshoff Pol et al, 2004) and are suggestive that brain changes exist prior to the onset of psychosis. In addition, a prospective study suggests that the onset of schizophrenia in the relatives of patients is associated with a reduction in the volume of the left parahippocampal gyrus (Job et al, 2005).
Relatively little is known about the nature of MRI abnormalities in subjects with an at-risk mental state. Using a region of interest approach, Phillips et al (2002) reported that hippocampal volume in these individuals was smaller than that in healthy controls but not than in patients with first-episode psychosis. Within the at-risk mental state group, those who later developed psychosis had a larger left hippocampal volume than those who did not. More recently, using a voxel-based approach in subjects from the same centre in Melbourne, Pantelis et al (2003) found that subjects with prodromal symptoms who later became psychotic had smaller inferior frontal and cingulate gyrus volumes than those who did not. However, in a cross-sectional study, using a region of interest approach, Velakoulis et al (2006) reported that patients with an at-risk mental state had normal baseline hippocampal and amygdala grey matter volumes whether or not they subsequently developed psychosis. These results suggests that some structural brain changes occur closer to the transition to psychosis than suggested by the traditional neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia (Murray & Lewis, 1987; Weinberger, 1987). However, the numbers of subjects in these studies have been modest as their recruitment depends on the provision of specialised clinical services (Broome et al, 2005).
In a previous study, we compared the at-risk mental state sample as a whole (independent of subsequent clinical outcome) with the controls and the patients with first-episode psychosis (Borgwardt et al, 2007). We found significant between-group differences in grey matter volume in the posterior part of the left superior temporal gyrus and the adjacent part of the left insula, and in a second region involving the posterior cingulate gyrus and precuneus. Direct comparison of the at-risk mental state group and controls revealed additional areas of smaller grey matter volume in the left medial temporal cortex. However, the at-risk mental state group was heterogeneous, including both patients who later developed psychosis (–transition) and those who did not. Within the at-risk mental state group, those subjects who developed psychosis (–transition) had less grey matter than subjects who did not in the right insula, inferior frontal and superior frontal gyrus (Borgwardt et al, 2007).
In the present study, we found that the at-risk mental state group who subsequently became psychotic showed regional grey matter volume reductions relative to healthy controls in the posterior cingulate gyrus, precuneus, and paracentral lobule bilaterally, and they extended into the left superior parietal lobule. Reductions in the cingulate gyrus are well-established findings in patients with schizophrenia, and these areas have also been implicated in functional imaging studies, although findings have been more frequent in its anterior than its posterior part. Abnormalities in the precuneus have been less frequently described in schizophrenia, but reduced volume and differential activation have been reported (Falkai et al, 1988; Antonova et al, 2005). Our findings of normal hippocampal and amygdala volume size in patients with an at-risk mental state at the very early phase of a first-episode psychosis are consistent with a previous report assessing this patient group (Velakoulis et al, 2006).
We also identified areas where the at-risk mental state group who later became psychotic had relatively more grey matter volume than healthy controls. These differences were evident in the left parietal/posterior temporal region that included the left supramarginal and angular gyri and inferior parietal lobule, plus the posterior portions of the superior and middle temporal gyri. These differences might be related to an active pathological process that underlies the transition towards psychosis and is associated with greater grey matter volume. However, longitudinal MRI studies of high-risk individuals who developed psychosis have mainly found reductions, rather than increases in regional volumes over time. It is also possible that the volumetric differences of the at-risk mental state participants who did later develop psychosis are long-standing differences that predate the onset of prodromal symptoms and reflect a differential vulnerability to psychosis within the at-risk mental state group. This issue could be addressed by repeated scanning of subjects with an at-risk mental state during the at-risk period.
The subgroup of at-risk mental state subjects who developed psychosis could also be regarded as having very early first-episodes. Even if this was so, it is still true that the MRI findings predate what is conventionally regarded as the onset of psychosis. Furthermore, we also found differences between the at-risk mental state–transition and first-episode groups that suggest that there are true differences between these individuals. Our data are suggestive that neuroanatomical abnormalities emerge during the process of transition from an at-risk mental state to acute psychotic illness and support a recent longitudinal imaging study from the PACE clinic (Pantelis et al, 2003).
Limitations
We used a cross-sectional design, whereas a longitudinal design with
repeated scans would enable intra-individual comparison. The group sizes were
relatively small, however not smaller then in other neuroimaging studies of
participants with an at-risk mental state. The differences in grey matter
volume that we observed are very unlikely to be related to treatment with mood
stabilisers or antipsychotic drugs, as the majority of the at-risk mental
state–transition (92%) and the first-episode (60%) groups were naive to
these medications at the time of scanning. However, when repeating the
analyses including relatively many treated subjects (at-risk mental
state–transition v. first-episode group; three-group
comparison) without the subjects on medication the results did not change. It
should also be acknowledged that the grey matter abnormalities are only seen
at group level, so the contribution to individual diagnosis or clinical
assessment of risk is modest. However, these findings provide evidence that
active brain changes occur in patients developing psychosis and indicate that
these brain changes may be prevented by early antipsychotic treatment within
early detection clinics.
Conclusions
Overall, the results of this and earlier studies indicate that some brain
abnormalities are already present before the transition to psychosis, whereas
others manifest with the first psychotic episode. The early abnormalities may
reflect developmental or later maturational processes in adolescence and early
adulthood and are associated with an increased vulnerability to psychosis.
Additional volumetric brain abnormalities within the at-risk mental state
group are then particularly associated with the subsequent development of
psychosis. These brain areas may be particularly informative to a better
understanding of the underlying neurobiology of the progression to
psychosis.
|
|
|---|
This research was supported by project grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (Nos 3200-057216-99, 3200-057216/3), Eli Lilly (CH), AstraZeneca (CH), Janssen-Cilag (CH) and Bristol-Myers Squibb (CH). Furthermore, a personal grant (S.J.B.) was provided by the Swiss National Science Foundation (PBBSB-106936), the Novartis Foundation and the FAG Basel. The sponsor of the study had no role in study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, writing of this report or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Koutsouleris, G. J.E. Schmitt, C. Gaser, R. Bottlender, J. Scheuerecker, P. McGuire, B. Burgermeister, C. Born, M. Reiser, H.-J. Moller, et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of different vulnerability states for psychosis and their clinical outcomes The British Journal of Psychiatry, September 1, 2009; 195(3): 218 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tyrer From the Editor's desk. The British Journal of Psychiatry, September 1, 2009; 195(3): 280 - 280. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||