Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Freiburg
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Freiburg
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany
Correspondence: Professor Martin Bohus, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, J5, D-68159 Mannheim, Germany. Email: martin.bohus{at}zi-mannheim.de
None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.
|
|
|---|
Clinical experience suggests that people with borderline personality disorder often meet criteria for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, empirical data are sparse.
Aims
To establish the prevalence of childhood and adult ADHD in a group of women with borderline personality disorder and to investigate the psychopathology and childhood experiences of those with and without ADHD.
Method
We assessed women seeking treatment for borderline personality disorder (n=118) for childhood and adult ADHD, co-occurring Axis I and Axis II disorders, severity of borderline symptomatology and traumatic childhood experiences.
Results
Childhood (41.5%) and adult (16.1%) ADHD prevalence was high. Childhood ADHD was associated with emotional abuse in childhood and greater severity of adult borderline symptoms. Adult ADHD was associated with greater risk for co-occurring Axis I and II disorders.
Conclusions
Adults with severe borderline personality disorder frequently show a history of childhood ADHD symptomatology. Persisting ADHD correlates with frequency of co-occurring Axis I and II disorders. Severity of borderline symptomatology in adulthood is associated with emotional abuse in childhood. Further studies are needed to differentiate any potential causal relationship between ADHD and borderline personality disorder.
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
General diagnostic assessments
Co-occurring Axis I disorders were assessed by the Structured Clinical
Interview for DSM–IV Axis I Disorders
(SCID–I).18
Personality disorders were examined by the German version of the International
Personality Disorder Examination
(IPDE).19
The IPDE and the SCID–I were administered by experienced clinical
psychologists. To determine interrater reliability, a random sample of 10% of
the interviews were independently rated by a second observer. Interrater
reliability values were within the acceptable range for both the IPDE
(
=0.77) and the SCID–I (
=0.70).
Assessment of ADHD symptomatology
Participants rated their ADHD symptoms in childhood retrospectively, using
the short version of the Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS-k), German
version,20 which
includes 25 items on a five-point Likert-scale (`not at all' to `severe').
Following Fossati et al
(2002),7 we used a
very conservative cut-off score of
46 to indicate the presence of a
diagnosis of ADHD in childhood. Participants rated adult ADHD symptoms with
the ADHD–Checklist
(ADHD–CL),21
which includes 18 items on a three-point Likert-scale corresponding to the
diagnostic criteria of DSM–IV (0–2, `not at all' to `severe'). To
minimise the likelihood of overestimating the prevalence of adult ADHD
(especially the inattentive subtype), we used a cut-off of
25 to indicate
that participants met criteria for the combined subtype of ADHD. Only
patients who fulfilled both the WURS-k criteria and the ADHD–CL criteria
were diagnosed as having adult ADHD.
Assessment of borderline symptomatology
Severity of borderline symptomatology was assessed by the total score of
the Borderline Symptom List
(BSL).22 The BSL is
a self-report questionnaire of symptoms of borderline personality disorder
that includes 95 items on seven sub-scales (self-image, affect regulation,
self-destruction, dysphoria, loneliness, intrusion and hostility) and is based
on the DSM–IV criteria for the disorder (as assessed by the Diagnostic
Interview for Borderline Personality Disorder – Revised Version).
Participants rate the severity of symptoms on a five-point Likert scale (`not
at all' to `very strong'). The BSL has demonstrated high internal consistency
and test–retest reliability, strong construct validity and low
correlations with gender, age and level of education.
Assessment of childhood trauma experiences
Childhood history of abuse and neglect was assessed by the Childhood Trauma
Questionnaire (CTQ). The CTQ is a 28-item self-report inventory that assesses
five types of maltreatment – emotional, physical and sexual abuse, and
emotional and physical neglect. Also included in this questionnaire is a
three-item minimisation/denial scale for detecting false-negative trauma
reports.23
Statistical analyses
Statistically significant differences were assessed at a two-tailed alpha
level of <0.05. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS for
Windows, version 12, and `R', version 2.4.1 (R Foundation for Statistical
Computing,
http://www.R-project.org/).
To reduce the number of independent tests performed, multivariate logistic
regression was used. Eight separate regression models were computed: for each
of the two target variables (childhood ADHD as defined by WURS-k
46 and
adulthood ADHD symptomatology defined by ADHD symptom sum score
25), we
tested the influence of each of the four following sets of variables:
In order to assess the multivariate significance of each model, likelihood ratio statistics are reported; for each variable within the model, Wald Z-values are given.
|
|
|---|
Exploratory Mann–Whitney U-tests revealed no differences between participants who scored above v. below the threshold for childhood ADHD on the WURS-k in terms of age or education. Similarly, there were no significant differences in age or education between participants who scored above v. below the thresholds on the ADHD–CL for adult ADHD.
Axis I disorders
Almost all participants (99.2%) had at least one co-occurring Axis I
disorder (Table 1) (mean=5.04,
s.d.=2.45). For Axis I disorders including probable diagnoses this was 5.69
(2.46).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
Table 1 Co-occurring Axis I disorders (lifetime and current) in 118 women with
borderline personality disorder (SCID–I)
|
Axis II disorders
Of the 118 participants, 36 (30.5%) fulfilled only the diagnostic criteria
for borderline personality disorder, assessed by the IPDE. The remaining 69.5%
also fulfilled criteria for at least one other personality disorder: 43.2% met
criteria for one co-occurring personality disorder; 16.9% met criteria for
two, 6.8% for three, and 2.5% for four or five personality disorders. An
overview of co-occurring Axis II disorders is given in
Table 2.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
Table 2 Co-occurring Axis II disorders in 118 women with borderline personality
disorder measured by the International Personality Disorder Examination
|
Retrospective diagnosis of childhood ADHD
Of the 118 individuals studied, 49 (41.5%) fulfilled criteria for childhood
ADHD as retrospectively diagnosed by the WURS-k. The mean (s.d.) WURS-k score
among these 49 participants was 55.7 (6.8).
Adult ADHD symptomatology
Using the predefined cut-off of 25 on the ADHD–CL, 16.1% of the 118
participants were diagnosed with severe adult ADHD (combined subtype, mean
(s.d.) ADHD–CL score 28.79 (2.99)).
Influence of a diagnosis of ADHD on co-occurring disorders
Axis I disorders
The logistic regression analysis significantly discriminated between
participants with and without adult ADHD (model likelihood ratio=29.3,
P=0.022). Specific phobias and somatisation disorders were positively
associated with adult ADHD (Wald Z=2.24, P=0.025, and Wald
Z=2.25, P=0.024 respectively). Furthermore, the association
between adult ADHD and panic disorder as well as anorexia nervosa just missed
the level of significance (Wald Z=1.95, P=0.052, and Wald
Z=1.79, P=0.073 respectively). Logistic regression analyses
indicated that Axis I disorders did not significantly discriminate between
participants who met criteria for childhood ADHD and those who did not
(P=0.117).
Axis II disorders
Logistic regression indicated that personality disorders significantly
discriminated participants who were above v. below the thresholds for
adult ADHD (model likelihood ratio=16.92, P=0.031). Co-occurring
paranoid personality disorder was positively associated with adult ADHD (Wald
Z=2.19, P=0.029). For schizoid and dependent personality
disorders, and there was a trend (Wald Z=1.80, P=0.072, and
Wald Z=1.66, P=0.098 respectively).
Logistic regression analysis revealed a trend for a positive association between childhood ADHD and co-occurring personality disorders (model likelihood ratio=13.81, P=0.087) with a trend towards significance for a higher prevalence of paranoid personality disorder (Wald Z=1.93, P=0.054) among participants who reported childhood ADHD.
Influence of a diagnosis of ADHD on severity of borderline symptomatology
Logistic regression analyses revealed a trend towards a positive
association between symptoms of borderline personality disorder and adult ADHD
(Wald Z=1.72, P=0.085) and a significant positive
association between severity of current symptoms and childhood ADHD (Wald
Z=2.33, P=0.020, see
Table 3). Regarding the
DSM–IV criteria for borderline personality disorder, criterion 8
(difficulty controlling anger) and criterion 9 (stress-related dissociative
symptoms/paranoid ideations) were significantly more pronounced in
participants who reported childhood ADHD (WURS-k
46) compared with those
with WURS-k scores below the threshold for the childhood disorder.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
Table 3 Severity of borderline symptomatology and childhood trauma experiences
among participants (118 women with borderline personality disorder) with
retrospectively assessed childhood ADHD compared with participants without
|
Association of a diagnosis of ADHD with negative childhood experiencesy
Logistic regression analysis demonstrated a strong association between the
retrospective diagnosis of childhood ADHD and reported emotional abuse in
childhood measured by the CTQ (Wald Z=2.62, P=0.009). There
were no differences in terms of reported sexual or physical abuse and physical
or emotional neglect in childhood (Table
3).
In terms of adult ADHD and reported adverse childhood experiences, statistical analyses yielded no significant associations.
|
|
|---|
In terms of adult ADHD symptomatology we found a prevalence rate of 16.1% when only including participants who also fulfilled predefined criteria for childhood ADHD. To avoid the risk of overestimating the prevalence of adult ADHD of the inattentive type, which is especially high in people with borderline personality disorder with co-occurring disorders (such as substance misuse and affective disorders), we only included participants with ADHD of the combined subtype. Therefore, we cannot exclude a possible effect of other subtypes (inattentive, hyperactive/impulsive) or of participants in partial remission. A recently published meta-analysis on follow-up studies in childhood ADHD found a persistence rate of only 15% meeting full criteria for ADHD at age 25 years.14 Whereas the prevalence rate of adult ADHD in the present study is rather low (16.1%), the persistence rate is slightly higher (38.8%), but in line with recently published findings which revealed a persistence rate of 36.3% in respondents to a comorbidity survey study.25 Adverse family environment variables such as low social class and family conflicts are considered important risk factors for increased ADHD symptomatology26 and severity, and lack of treatment for the disorder in childhood predicts persistence into adulthood.25 Thus, it is possible that all three factors – negative environmental factors, ADHD severity and lack of treatment in childhood – contributed to the higher rate of persistence of ADHD that we observed in our sample. One could expect ADHD in childhood, especially when untreated, to have a negative impact on educational achievement, but we did not find differences in achievement among those with and those without ADHD. One intrepretation is that strong predictor variables such as sexual abuse, emotional neglect and physical neglect, which were equally distributed between the two patient groups, might have a greater impact on educational level than co-occurring ADHD.
Adult ADHD and Axis I and II disorders in borderline personality disorder
Interestingly, we found an influence of adult ADHD symptomatology on
co-occurring disorders among our participants. Both Axis I and Axis II
disorders (specific phobias and somatisation, a tendency towards panic
disorder and anorexia nervosa, paranoid personality disorder, elements of
schizoid and dependent personality disorder) were associated with a greater
likelihood of adult ADHD. In contrast, Axis I and II disorders were less
consistently associated with the presence of childhood ADHD.
History of childhood ADHD and severity of borderline personality disorder
Our findings also revealed that participants with more severe current
symptoms of borderline personality disorder were more likely to report
childhood ADHD. The cause of the association between childhood ADHD and more
severe borderline symptomatology in adulthood is not clear. In ADHD, various
genetic and neuroimaging studies support a genetic and neurobiological origin
largely associated with the central dopaminergic and noradrenergic
systems.27
Furthermore, other organic causes such as pregnancy and delivery
complications, maternal smoking and alcohol misuse during pregnancy have been
identified as risk factors for ADHD in
offspring.28
Adverse family environment variables such as low social class and family
conflicts are thought to be important risk factors for the exacerbation of
ADHD symptomatology rather than for the development of ADHD. In contrast,
adverse events such as sexual or physical abuse in childhood are well
documented as serious risk factors for the development and severity of
borderline personality
disorder.29–32
Thus, one could speculate that childhood ADHD associated with severe negative
childhood experiences predispose to the development of borderline personality
disorder in adulthood in a subgroup of individuals. In our sample, women with
borderline personality disorder retrospectively diagnosed with childhood ADHD
(WURS-k
46) reported a higher rate of emotional abuse in childhood than
those with WURS-k scores <46. These groups, however, did not differ in
terms of other negative childhood experiences (e.g. physical or sexual abuse
or neglect). Our findings regarding emotional abuse are consistent with those
of a recent study33
that found that emotional abuse and neglect were more common among adults with
ADHD compared with a control group. Therefore, the higher rate of emotional
abuse of our participants with childhood ADHD symptomatology may have led to
even more severe borderline symptomatology in adulthood.
As reported by Watson et al (2006)34 and by Simeon et al (2003)35 dissociative features are primarily correlated with emotional abuse and neglect as well as physical abuse in borderline personality disorder. In these studies, however, participants with the disorder were not screened for co-occurring ADHD. Thus, our findings of a more severe borderline symptomatology as well as the enhanced stress-related dissociative symptoms among women with borderline personality disorder retrospectively diagnosed with childhood ADHD could be explained by the increased risk of having been emotionally abused in childhood.
The precise mechanism for the high association between ADHD and borderline personality disorder found in our study is not clear. The high co-occurrence of these disorders may be due to overlapping clinical features and diagnostic criteria of the two disorders. In particular, intense anger and difficulty controlling anger (borderline personality disorder criterion 8) may overlap considerably with ADHD features. However, transient stress-related dissociative symptoms or paranoid ideation are not part of ADHD criteria. Moreover, the scales used for the assessment of ADHD (WURS-k, ADHD–CL) mainly focus on core symptoms of ADHD such as persistent inattention, distractability and hyperactivity, which are also not part of the current diagnostic criteria of borderline personality disorder.
Thus, further studies investigating the influence of the relationship between ADHD and adverse events in childhood on borderline symptom severity in adulthood are warranted.
Limitations
Some study limitations must be considered. First, ADHD symptoms, severity
of borderline personality disorder and negative childhood experiences were
assessed using self-report questionnaires, and we did not investigate data
reliability. Thus, the influence of current mood state or severity of symptoms
on our data cannot be conclusively excluded. Second, this was not a
prospective study; childhood ADHD was assessed retrospectively by the WURS-k.
Thus, it is unclear whether childhood ADHD would be similarly associated with
symptoms of borderline personality disorder or co-occurring disorders if
childhood ADHD symptoms had been assessed in childhood. Nevertheless, to avoid
an overestimation of ADHD diagnosis in childhood, we used a very conservative
cut-off score (
46), as described previously by Fossati et al
(2002),7 and the
prevalence of childhood ADHD remained high. Third, we used a self-report
measure (rather than a structured interview) of adult ADHD symptomatology
based on DSM–IV criteria for ADHD (the ADHD–CL). There are,
however, no specific DSM–IV criteria for adult ADHD, and the
SCID–I does not include questions for diagnosing adult ADHD. To avoid an
overestimation of co-occurring adult ADHD diagnoses, we used a very
conservative cut-off score. Using these criteria, we found persistence rates
comparable to those published by Kessler et al
(2005),25 which led
us to conclude that these participants most likely had persisting adult ADHD.
The conservative cut-off scores and the applied scales for the assessment of
ADHD, which mainly detect the core features of inattention and hyperactivity,
speak against a merely methodologically based association of ADHD and
borderline personality disorder.
Finally, the findings of our study are based on observations from only female and treatment-seeking participants recruited from the out-patient departments of our two clinics. Therefore, the study results cannot be generalised to all people with borderline personality disorder.
Implications
Our findings indicate that childhood ADHD is associated with greater
emotional abuse in childhood as well as more severe borderline psychopathology
in adult women with borderline personality disorder. Thus, ADHD in childhood
may be considered a risk factor that predisposes to borderline personality
disorder in adulthood in a subgroup of patients. Clinicians should be aware of
childhood ADHD and co-occurring adult ADHD among patients with borderline
personality disorder. Future treatment development might focus on whether
different interventions are needed for subgroups of patients with borderline
personality disorder who either have current ADHD or reported childhood ADHD.
In addition, the effect of methylphenidate and noradrenergic
psychopharmacological agents should be systematically investigated in patients
with borderline personality disorder and co-occurring ADHD.
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related articles in BJP:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||