The British Journal of Psychiatry (2008) 192: 232. doi: 10.1192/bjp.192.3.232a
© 2008 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaskin, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Happell, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gaskin, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Happell, B.

Correspondence

Authors’ reply:

Cadeyrn J. Gaskin

Centre for Psychiatric Nursing, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Email: cjgaskin{at}unimelb.edu.au

Stephen J. Elsom and Brenda Happell

Centre for Psychiatric Nursing, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Edited by Kiriakos Xenitidis and Colin Campbell

Reducing seclusion in psychiatric facilities often involves the coordination of a range of interventions to meet the needs of such organisations and their staff.1 In their response to our review, Scott & Dean have helpfully highlighted the need to tailor interventions to suit specific facilities through reminding readers of the differing determinants of emotional distress and aggression that are present for children and adults. These differences influence the reasons why children and adults are secluded.

In combining the literature on seclusion reduction initiatives at child, adolescent and adult psychiatric facilities, we do not contend that seclusion practices across these facilities, or the reasons for seclusion, are the same. We did, however, find no meaningful differences in the employment of seclusion reduction interventions between child, adolescent and adult facilities. Many of the interventions we found (e.g. monitoring seclusion episodes, staff education, changing the therapeutic environment) were used equally as often in child psychiatric units as they were in adult facilities.

Although the broad interventions for seclusion reduction appear similar between child and adult psychiatric facilities, the content of each type of intervention is likely to differ between facilities that serve specific populations. For example, staff education conducted at a child psychiatric unit to reduce seclusion may well be different to that provided at an adult psychiatric unit.

Our paper has provided the bare bones of a range of interventions that have been successfully used to reduce seclusion in psychiatric facilities. We welcome further comment, such as that from Scott & Dean, and the publication of seclusion reduction initiatives to help describe the ways in which these interventions can be applied in various types of facilities.

REFERENCES

    1
  1. Gaskin CJ, Elsom SJ, Happell B. Interventions for reducing the use of seclusion in psychiatric facilities: review of the literature. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 191: 298 –303.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaskin, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Happell, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gaskin, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Happell, B.