The British Journal of Psychiatry (2008) 192: 242. doi: 10.1192/bjp.192.3.242
© 2008 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJP
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tyrer, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tyrer, P.

COLUMNS

From The Editor's Desk

Peter Tyrer

Refreshing contradictions

My school headmaster was an autocrat whose motto was ‘I will not be contradicted’. This is not the wisest of philosophies and, although he ran his school with military precision, beneath its superficial calm many developed a seething primordial desire to foment dissent. This achieved its most magnificent expression one summer term when some enterprising boys splendidly coordinated the diversion of traffic from the main road alongside the school so that every vehicle came into the school drive. At the same time a fake goodwill visit had been organised with a US Army unit, who also rolled down the drive in their military vehicles, adding to the magnificent unreality of the situation as the top brass disembarked in their fruit salad regalia waiting to be lauded by the school. My abiding memory is of the headmaster’s lonely figure in the drive, fuming in impotent rage and desperately trying to assert his authority when all about had abandoned theirs.

Such are the perils of life for those who abhor contradiction, and they suffer appropriately in this issue as the iconoclasm of good science topples a few idols. We are reminded by Lewis & Lieberman (pp. 161–163) that the Orwellian chant of ‘atypical antipsychotics good, typical antipsychotics bad’ is indeed the vacant refrain of sheep-like adherents to an outdated chimera of progress, and the similarly universal one of ‘community services good, hospital services bad’ is questioned by Capdevielle & Ritchie (pp. 164–165). The old notion that those with severe mental illness should be kept safely but delicately away from the rest of society in ‘sheltered employment’, knitting furiously and stuffing rabbits, has also been contradicted entirely by the work of Catty et al (pp. 224–231) and others.1 The now widespread belief that the cause of self-harm can be laid firmly at the door of past childhood sexual abuse also comes under the microscope in Klonsky & Moyer’s systematic review (pp. 166–170) and is found to be surprisingly lacking in evidence. My general attitude to all such hypotheses is that when they seem to constitute a neat package with no loose ends they are probably wrong. The accumulating evidence that cognitive–behavioural and other related approaches are effective in those with recurrent self-harm (Slee et al, pp. 202–211) also runs against the child abuse theory; nothing in the treatment has any connection to past abuse, which is irrelevant to the success of the intervention. The simple truth is rarely simple in discovery, although after discovery is often simple to understand. The art of judicious contradiction is a useful sword to cut through obfuscation and dogma, and Cooper and her colleagues (pp. 185–190) may have hit on something in their elegant dissection of perceived and actual ethnic disadvantage. Perceived disadvantage should provoke paranoid thoughts, but those who have paranoid thoughts show no association with this perception. Could it be that we non-psychotic folk, anxious to reassure and explain, infer too much and ask too little?

Lost in classification

The paper by Das-Munshi et al (pp. 171–177) is an invitation for me to indulge in one of my greatest gripes. The failure in formal psychiatric classifications to acknowledge the clinical fact that mixed anxiety and depression is by far the most common psychiatric disorder is obtuse and inexplicable. It is allowed a foot in the door as a ‘sub-syndromal’ disorder and even at this level is associated clearly with distress and dysfunction that often exceeds that of single disorders.2 When time after time we find that depression and anxiety develop as a common pattern,3 show no evidence of hierarchical relationships4 and together contribute so much to pathology and outcome5,6 it seems bizarre that this combination of symptoms is merely regarded as an incidental ‘comorbidity’. Of course the pathophysiology of anxiety and depression are different but there is no more reason to keep them apart as there is to keep apart the symptoms of anaemia and those of subacute combined degeneration of the spinal cord in pernicious anaemia just because they are in different physiological systems. So wake up, DSM–V and ICD–11, and remember:

  • Anxiety and depression
  • Teach us one important lesson
  • Though in separation their study pleases
  • We must remember they are not diseases
  • And like wind and rain in stormy weather
  • These symptoms always appear together.7

REFERENCES

    1
  1. Latimer, EA, Lecomte, T, Becker, DR, Drake RE, Duclos I, Piat M, Lahaie N, St-Pierre M-S, Therrien C, Xie H. Generalisability of the individual placement and support model of supported employment: results of a Canadian randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2006; 189: 65 –73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. 2
  3. Piccinelli M, Rucci P, Ustün B, Simon G. Typologies of anxiety, depression and somatization symptoms among primary care attenders with no formal mental disorder. Psychol Med 1999; 29: 677 –88.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. 3
  5. Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Boden JM. Structure of internalising symptoms in early adulthood. Br J Psychiatry 2006; 189: 540 –6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. 4
  7. Moffitt TE, Harrington H, Caspi A, Kim-Cohen J, Goldberg D, Gregory AM, Poulton R. Depression and generalized anxiety disorder: cumulative and sequential comorbidity in a birth cohort followed prospectively to age 32 years. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007; 64: 651 –60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. 5
  9. Dickens CM, McGowan L, Percival C, Tomenson B, Cotter L, Heagerty A, Creed FH. Contribution of depression and anxiety to impaired health-related quality of life following first myocardial infarction. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 189: 367 –72.[CrossRef]
  10. 6
  11. Andreescu C, Lenze EJ, Dew MA, Begley AE, Mulsant BH, Dombrovski AY, Pollock BG, Stack J, Miller MD, Reynolds CF. Effect of comorbid anxiety on treatment response and relapse risk in late-life depression: controlled study. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 190: 344 –9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. 7
  13. Tyrer P. Anxiety: A Multidisciplinary Review: 198. Oxford University Press, 1999 .

Related articles in BJP:

CATIE and CUtLASS: can we handle the truth?
Shôn Lewis and Jeffrey Lieberman
BJP 2008 192: 161-163. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

The long and the short of it: are shorter periods of hospitalisation beneficial?
Delphine Capdevielle and Karen Ritchie
BJP 2008 192: 164-165. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Childhood sexual abuse and non-suicidal self-injury: meta-analysis
E. David Klonsky and Anne Moyer
BJP 2008 192: 166-170. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Public health significance of mixed anxiety and depression: beyond current classification
Jayati Das-Munshi, David Goldberg, Paul E. Bebbington, Dinesh K. Bhugra, Traolach S. Brugha, Michael E. Dewey, Rachel Jenkins, Rob Stewart, and Martin Prince
BJP 2008 192: 171-177. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Perceptions of disadvantage, ethnicity and psychosis
Claudia Cooper, Craig Morgan, Majella Byrne, Paola Dazzan, Kevin Morgan, Gerard Hutchinson, Gillian A. Doody, Glynn Harrison, Julian Leff, Peter Jones, Khalida Ismail, Robin Murray, Paul Bebbington, and Paul Fearon
BJP 2008 192: 185-190. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Cognitive–behavioural intervention for self-harm: randomised controlled trial
Nadja Slee, Nadia Garnefski, Rien van der Leeden, Ella Arensman, and Philip Spinhoven
BJP 2008 192: 202-211. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Predictors of employment for people with severe mental illness: results of an international six-centre randomised controlled trial
Jocelyn Catty, Pascale Lissouba, Sarah White, Thomas Becker, Robert E. Drake, Angelo Fioritti, Martin Knapp, Christoph Lauber, Wulf Rössler, Toma Tomov, Jooske van Busschbach, Durk Wiersma, and Tom Burns
BJP 2008 192: 224-231. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BJP
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tyrer, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tyrer, P.