private practice, Sydney, Australia
Northern Sydney Central Coast Area Health Service, Macquarie Hospital, North Ryde, Australia
National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
private practice, and Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety Disorders, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales at St Vincents Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Correspondence: Dr Large, PO Box 110, Double Bay, 1360 NSW Australia. Email: mmbl{at}bigpond.com
|
|
|---|
It has been stated that rates of homicide due to mental disorder are constant over time.
Aims
To examine whether there were changes in the rates of homicide due to mental disorder over time, and whether changes in these rates were associated with changes in the rates of other homicides in England and Wales.
Method
Examination of four sets of official homicide statistics from England and Wales from 1946 to 2004.
Results
The rate of total homicide and the rate of homicide due to mental disorder rose steadily until the mid-1970s. From then there was a reversal in the rate of homicides attributed to mental disorder, which declined to historically low levels, while other homicides continued to rise.
Conclusions
The reasons for the rise and fall in homicides attributed to mental disorder are not clear. The earlier increase in such homicides may have been due to the same sociological factors that caused the increase in other homicides over that time. The subsequent decline may have been due to improvements in psychiatric treatments and service organisation. Another possibility is that there has been an informal change to the legal tests for the finding of homicide due to mental disorder.
|
|
|---|
The first of Coids epidemiological laws holds that the higher the rate of homicide in a population, the lower the proportion of homicide offenders that are mentally disordered.3 The existence of this law was supported by an interpretation of Home Office statistics from England and Wales that showed a decline in the proportion of homicides due to mental disorder, and a rise in the total number of homicides in England and Wales between 1957 and 1995.4 However, if homicide due to mental disorder had been constant, the decline in the proportion of such homicides from 50% to 10% of all homicides could only have been explained by a 10-fold increase in total homicides. In fact, much of the decline in the proportion of homicides due to mental disorder appears to be due to a fall in the rate of such homicides since the 1970s.
In this paper, we re-examine the official homicide statistics from England and Wales and the proposition that statistics for homicide due to mental disorder have been stable over time.
|
|
|---|
Statistics for homicides due to mental disorder are more complete after 1957, when the defence of diminished responsibility was introduced and the mandatory death penalty was abolished.
For the purpose of consistency we used the same definition of mental disorder as Taylor & Gunn,4 which is the total of the findings of Section 2 under the Homicide Act 1957 (diminished responsibility), infanticide, not guilty by reason of insanity and permanent unfitness to stand trial (see Appendix). We also chart the trends in the components of homicide due to mental disorder (Figs. 1 and 2) and homicide–suicides (Fig. 3). Taylor & Gunn did not include homicide–suicides in the mental disorder group, as it is not known what proportion of homicide–suicide offenders are also mentally abnormal (e.g. those unfit to stand trial, not guilty by reason of insanity, with diminished responsibility or infanticide).4 Homicide–suicide statistics are examined separately in this paper. Non-age-adjusted homicide rates per 100 000 were calculated using population figures from census data,18 using an assumption of linear population growth between each census.
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide] |
Fig. 1 Homicides due to mental disorder in England and Wales, 1952–2004. The true figures from 2000 onwards may eventually be higher as about 10% of legal proceedings from 2000 and 20% from 2003 were not concluded.17
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide] |
Fig. 2 Homicide rates in England and Wales, 1946–2004.
|
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide] |
Fig. 3 Homicide–suicides in England and Wales, 1952–2004.
|
Later legal redetermination of cases may have caused some discrepancies in homicide numbers between the four sets of homicide statistics. The total number of annual homicides after 1967 taken from statistics held by the House of Commons library and reported by Richards16 were 17% (s.d.=14) greater than the Home Office statistics reported in Taylor & Gunn.4 However, an analysis of the trends and associations using total homicide figures from Richards16 was very similar to that of Taylor & Gunn4 and was hence not reported. There were only minor differences between the figures reported by Gibson & Klein,14,15 Coleman et al17 and Taylor & Gunn4 for the periods in which the statistics overlapped. Where there was a discrepancy, the most recent statistics were used.
We examined changes in mentally disordered homicide over time using Kendalls tau, and in relation to total homicide using linear regression. Statistics were performed using SPSS version 15.0 for Windows.
|
|
|---|
In the subsequent 24 years (1981–2004) homicides due to mental disorder declined and were negatively correlated with the rate of homicide by people without mental disorder (Kendalls tau=–0.829, two-tailed significance P<0.0001). The absolute number of homicides due to mental disorder fell to levels not seen since the early 1950s and the rate has been at historic lows of 0.07 per 100 000 or lower since 2000 (Fig. 1).
Most of the increase in homicides that were recorded as being due to mental disorder was a result of an increase in verdicts of diminished responsibility. However, there were also peaks in infanticide, homicide offenders who were found not guilty by reason of insanity and among those found unfit for trial in the late 1960s and early 1970s (Fig. 1).
Relationship between rates and proportions of homicide due to mental disorder and other homicides
The proportion of homicides due to mental disorder fell over the period
1957–2004 as a result of two separate trends
(Fig. 2). In the first 24 years
(1957–1980) there was a very strong relationship between the rates of
homicide due to mental disorder and other homicides (r=0.898,
r2=0.806, t=6.877, P<0.0001). In this
period the proportion of homicide offenders who were mentally ill fell,
despite the rise in homicides due to mental disorder, as the total homicide
rates also increased. In the second period (1981–2004), the rates of
homicide due to mental disorder and other homicides were negatively correlated
(r=–0.920, r2=0.846,
t=–11.00, P<0.0001) and the proportion of homicides
due to mental disorder also fell because the annual number declined
significantly, whereas the rate of other homicides continued to rise.
Homicide followed by suicide
Homicide followed by suicide was considered separately and did not follow
the pattern of homicide due to mental disorder. There was a small but
significant fall in murder–suicides in the period after the abolition of
the death penalty in November 1965. Between 1952 and 1965 there were 1928
homicides of which 521 (27%) were homicide–suicides, whereas between
1966 and 2004 there were 19 236 homicides of which 1357 were
homicide–suicides (7.1%) (
2=865, d.f.=1,
P<0.001). The fall in the proportion of homicide–suicides is
mainly explained by the rise in total homicides, but the total number of
homicide–suicides also fell from 37.2 per year (s.d.=3.76) in the 14
years before the abolition of the death penalty to 30.9 per year (s.d.=8.32)
during the following 14 years (unpaired two-tailed t-test,
t=2.57, d.f.=26, P=0.016)
(Fig. 3).
|
|
|---|
Explanations for changes in homicide rates
One possible explanation for both the rise and fall in homicides due to
mental disorder may have been changes in the threshold for the finding of a
verdict of diminished responsibility, the largest group of such homicides.
However, there have been no changes to the official definitions of the
defences to murder since the reforms of the
mid-1950s,20 and
change in the threshold for diminished responsibility is unlikely to have had
an influence on findings of infanticide, not guilty by reason of insanity or
unfit to stand trial, which also peaked between 1965 and 1975 and then
fell.
Another possibility is that methods of detecting mental disorder before trial have changed over the past 50 years. Fazel & Grann6 concluded that the high rate of mental disorder among homicide offenders in Sweden was a result of closer psychiatric scrutiny of Swedish offenders. If anything, the detection of mental illness among prisoners is more likely to have improved over the past 50 years and it seems unlikely that there has been a decline in the ability of courts to detect the role of mental disorder.
It is conceivable that there was a peak in the 1970s of incidence of severe and enduring mental illness. Rates of schizophrenia are probably not as stable as was once believed21 or it may be that a particular combination of mental illness and patterns of drug misuse may have resulted in a peak in homicides due to mental disorder. However, neither of these hypotheses is supported by substantial empirical evidence.
There may be separate explanations for the rise and the subsequent fall in homicide due to mental disorder. First, it is likely that rates of abnormal homicide increased because of the same sociological factors (e.g. the availability of weapons, patterns of substance misuse, and patterns of internal and external migration) that caused the increase in total homicide. This is consistent with the finding that regions with a high total homicide rate also have larger numbers of homicides by people who are mentally ill9–11 and by those with schizophrenia.9,10
Effect of treatment on homicide rates
The subsequent fall may well be due to improvements in treatment. The
introduction and increasing use of antipsychotic medication, the greater
awareness of the treatment of psychosis by primary care providers after
deinstitutionalisation, and the creation of regional health authorities with
responsibility for defined populations, may have all contributed to the
observed decline in abnormal homicide since the 1970s. This is consistent with
the findings of recent studies in the UK and Australia, which suggest that
initial treatment of psychosis may reduce the risk of
homicide.22–24
The finding that the decline in abnormal homicide is due to better treatment
is supported by a recently published study showing a parallel rise and fall in
suicide rates, particularly among younger
men.5 Treatment is a
better explanation than limitation of lethal means because treatment of the
mentally ill would not be expected to significantly reduce total homicides,
and reduction in the availability of lethal means would be likely to reduce
total homicides.
Regardless of the reason for the change, the main finding of this study is that rates of homicide due to mental disorder are not fixed. This finding counteracts previous views about the potential to reduce this form of homicide3,4 and should encourage further research to examine the causes of homicides by the mentally ill, which in turn could inform clinical practice and save lives.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related articles in BJP:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Nielssen, D. Bourget, T. Laajasalo, M. Liem, A. Labelle, H. Hakkanen-Nyholm, F. Koenraadt, and M. M. Large Homicide of Strangers by People with a Psychotic Illness Schizophr Bull, October 12, 2009; (2009) sbp112v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Vinkers, M. Barendregt, and E. de Beurs Homicide due to mental disorder The British Journal of Psychiatry, February 1, 2009; 194(2): 185 - 185. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Coid Homicide due to mental disorder The British Journal of Psychiatry, February 1, 2009; 194(2): 185 - 186. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Nielssen and M. Large Rates of Homicide During the First Episode of Psychosis and After Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Schizophr Bull, November 5, 2008; (2008) sbn144v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||