Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol
Academic Unit of Psychiatry, University of Bristol
Academic Unit of Psychiatry, University of Bristol, and Department of Psychological Medicine, Cardiff University
Academic Unit of Psychiatry, University of Bristol
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol
Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham
Department of Psychology, University of Warwick
Academic Unit of Psychiatry, University of Bristol
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, UK.
Correspondence: David Gunnell, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK. Email: D.J.Gunnell{at}bristol.ac.uk
None.
The UK Medical Research Council, the Wellcome Trust and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. This research was funded by the Wellcome Trust; grant no. 072043
|
|
|---|
Previous studies have suggested that impaired fetal and childhood growth are associated with an increased risk of schizophrenia, but the association of pre-adult growth with non-clinical psychotic symptoms (psychosis-like symptoms) in children is not known.
Aims
To explore the associations of body size at birth and age 7.5 years with childhood psychosis-like symptoms.
Method
Prospective cohort of children followed up from birth to age 12: the ALSPAC cohort.
Results
Data on 6000 singleton infants born after 37 weeks of gestation. A one standard deviation increase in birth weight was associated with an 18% reduction in the risk of definite psychosis-like symptoms after adjusting for age and gestation (Odds ratio (OR) = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.73–0.92, P = 0.001). This association was partly confounded by maternal anthropometry, smoking during pregnancy, socioeconomic status and IQ. A similar association was seen for birth length and psychosis-like symptoms, which disappeared after controlling for birth weight. There was little evidence for an association of 7-year height or adiposity with psychosis-like symptoms.
Conclusions
Measures of impaired fetal, but not childhood, growth are associated with an increased risk of psychosis-like symptoms in 12-year-olds.
|
|
|---|
More research is needed to confirm both the aetiology and long-term health consequences of psychosis-like symptoms in childhood. Analysis of the Dunedin cohort found that the risk of psychosis-like symptoms at age 11 was higher among children with low IQ and delayed motor or language development, suggesting that psychosis-like symptoms may be part of a pan-developmental spectrum of impairments associated with schizophreniform disorder.6
A number of studies have found associations between measures of restricted fetal and childhood growth and later risk of psychosis.7–9 Such associations are thought to indicate that factors affecting pre-adult growth may also influence neuro-development and, in turn, the risk of psychosis. The investigation of such factors in relation to psychosis-like symptoms will both provide evidence of relevance to the neurodevelopmental model of psychosis10 and further clarify the relevance of psychosis-like symptoms to the study of the aetiology of psychosis. Here, we investigate the association of birth weight, birth length, childhood height and body mass index (BMI) with psychosis-like symptoms at age 12 and whether any association between these measures and psychosis-like symptoms is mediated through their association with IQ. Our research was conducted on members of a large population-based birth cohort, ALSPAC. The cohort was originally established in the early 1990s to investigate how genotype combines with the environment to influence health and development.
|
|
|---|
Ethical approval
Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ALSPAC Law and Ethics
Committee and the local research ethics committees.
Non-clinical psychotic symptoms
Non-clinical psychotic symptoms (psychosis-like symptoms) were measured at
the ALSPAC 12-year clinic using the PLIKSi semi-structured face-to-face
interview.5
Psychology graduates rated the children on whether they had experienced any of
12 main items of psychotic symptoms: hallucinations (visual and auditory);
delusions (delusions of being spied on, persecution, thoughts being read,
reference, control, grandiose ability and other unspecified delusions); and
bizarre delusions (thought broadcasting, insertion and withdrawal). The items
were assessed to be: not present, suspected or definitely present. The
agreement between interviewers was good; the average kappa value (
) for
interrater reliability was 0.72.
Two main psychosis-like symptom outcomes are considered in this paper: whether any of the 12 items were assessed as being suspected or definitely present at the 12-year interviews; and a narrower outcome of definite symptoms only. As secondary analyses we also examined associations specifically with third person auditory hallucinations and `first rank' delusions (delusions of control or delusions of thought broadcast, insertion or control). These two groups of symptoms were also combined as narrowly defined psychosis-like symptoms; these symptoms are considered to be more characteristic of schizophrenia, in accordance with both DSM–IV12 and ICD–1013 criteria. Finally, we examined frequently occurring definite psychosis-like symptoms without attributions i.e. any definite symptoms occurring monthly or more often, which did not occur during a state of going to sleep, waking from sleep, fever or directly following any substance misuse.
Measures of growth and adiposity
Birth weights were extracted from hospital records and birth length (crown
to heel) was measured by ALSPAC staff using a Harpenden neonatometer (Holtain
Ltd,
www.anthropometer.com).
The ponderal index, a measure of infant adiposity, was calculated as
100xbirth weight (g) birth length (cm3).
All participants were invited to attend a health examination at age 7.5 years. Standing height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm, using a Harpenden stadiometer as described by Cameron.14 Weight was measured to the nearest 50 g using Tanita weighing scales (Tanita UK Ltd, Uxbridge). Body mass index was calculated from the height and weight measurements (weight (kg)/height (m2)). Waist circumference was measured to the nearest mm at the minimum circumference of the abdomen between the iliac crests and the lowest rib, using the Harpenden anthropometric tape.
All weight and length measurements were considered in quintiles calculated from the data or recognised categories and gender-specific z-scores, as appropriate. For the measures at 7.5 years, the z-scores were estimated from models that also took account of the age (in months) of the children when they were measured.
Potential confounders
Gestation was estimated from the date of last menstrual period and was
included in the models as a continuous variable. Resuscitation at birth (yes
or no) – a measure of likely asphyxia – was obtained from birth
records. Questionnaires during the antenatal period provided information on
further potential confounders: maternal parity (zero, one, two or more);
mother's pre-pregnancy height and weight (considered as continuous measures);
paternal height and weight (considered as continuous measures); maternal and
paternal age (in years); maternal smoking during pregnancy (number of
cigarettes smoked per day); household crowding (number of people in the
householdnumber of rooms in the home); family history of schizophrenia
(parental report that either they or the grandparents of the study child had
schizophrenia); parental social class was assessed based on the lower of the
mother or partner's occupational social class (using the 1991 OPCS
classification15
and dichotomising into manual and non-manual); housing tenure
(mortgaged/owned, council rented or rented/other); and maternal education
(less than O-level, O-level, or more than O-level, where O-levels were the
standard school-leaving qualifications taken around age 16 years until
recently in the UK).
An abbreviated form of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC)–III (UK version) was used to measure the IQ of the children at the ALSPAC 8-year clinic.16 We included this as a continuous variable in multivariable models to investigate whether any association between measures of growth and psychosis might be mediated through the association of fetal growth with IQ,17 a known risk factor for psychosis.18,19
Statistical analyses
All analyses were carried out using SAS version 8 for Windows. Analysis was
restricted to singletons born after 37 weeks gestation as both multiple and
premature birth is strongly associated with birth size and such infants are
more prone to asphyxia and are at increased risk of later psychological
morbidity. Gender-adjusted differences in the growth measures for those that
did and did not attend the psychosis-like symptoms interview were examined
with linear regression models. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to
assess the linear relationship between birth weight and birth length. Logistic
regression models were used to investigate the association of birth measures
with both any suspected or definite psychosis-like symptoms item and definite
psychosis-like symptoms positive cases only, after adjusting for age at the
psychosis-like symptoms interview, gender and gestation; however, gender was
not included in models which contained the gender-specific z-scores.
Results are presented by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI).
Associations were also examined for narrowly defined psychosis-like symptoms
and frequently occurring definite psychosis-like symptoms without
attributions. The analysis was then repeated for the measures from the 7-year
clinic, but gestation was not included in these models. Likelihood ratio tests
(LRTs) were used to assess whether there was any evidence of non-linear
effects, by including the quadratic terms for the z-scores of birth weight and
ponderal index in the models. Each potential confounder was considered
separately in the models to take account of the impact of changing sample
sizes because of missing data for the different confounders assessed.
|
|
|---|
We have previously shown that cohort members who did not complete the psychosis-like symptoms interview were more likely to be male (54% v. 49%), have parents in a manual occupation (55% v. 43%) and have less educated mothers (39% v. 21% did not obtain any O-levels compared with those who were interviewed).5 Furthermore, cohort members who attended the psychosis-like symptoms interview had a (gender-adjusted) birth weight 43.6 g heavier than those that did not attend, and were 0.15 cm longer at birth. There were slight differences in the 7-year height and BMIs; those that attended the clinics were 0.33 cm shorter and had BMIs that were 0.28 kg/m2 lower.
Birth measures
Associations of the three measures of fetal growth – birth weight,
birth length and ponderal index – with psychosis-like symptoms are shown
in online Table DS2. As there was no evidence that associations differed in
males and females (P (interaction) ranged from P = 0.2 to
P = 0.9), the data for males and females were combined. The models
were initially adjusted for age at the psychosis-like symptoms interview and
gender (where appropriate), and then gestation was also included in the
models.
There were weak inverse associations of birth weight, birth length and ponderal index with any suspected or definite psychosis-like symptoms: the strongest association was with ponderal index.
Associations were stronger in relation to the definite psychosis-like
symptoms outcome. As birth weight, birth length and ponderal index increase,
the odds of psychosis-like symptoms decline. There was an 18% reduction in the
odds of psychosis-like symptoms in relation to a one standard deviation
increase in birth weight in models controlling for age and gestation (OR =
0.82, 95% CI 0.73–0.92, P = 0.001). The OR per kg increase in
birth weight (results not presented in online Table DS2) was 0.65 (95% CI
0.51–0.84). There was no statistical evidence of a non-linear
association with birth weight (LRT
2 = 1.45, P =
0.23). The association of birth length with definite psychosis-like symptoms
was similarly strong (OR per standard deviation increase = 0.84, 95% CI
0.73–0.98, P = 0.022). The OR per 10 cm increase in birth
length (results not presented in online Table DS2) was 0.43 (95% CI
0.20–0.89). Associations were similar in relation to ponderal index (OR
per standard deviation increase = 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.96, P =
0.011). There was weak statistical evidence of a non-linear association with
ponderal index (LRT
2 = 3.08, P = 0.08), but no
evidence of an increased risk in participants with a high ponderal index at
birth. Associations were not changed when adjusting for resuscitation at
birth, as a measure of birth asphyxia.
There was a strong correlation between birth weight and birth length (r = 0.79, P<0.001). We repeated the model for birth weight, additionally controlling for birth length and vice versa; the association of birth weight with psychosis-like symptoms was strengthened in the adjusted model (OR per standard deviation increase in birth weight = 0.73, 95% CI 0.58–0.92, P = 0.007) but the association with birth length was greatly attenuated (OR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.85–1.34, P = 0.57).
Associations with narrowly defined symptoms and frequently occurring definite psychosis-like symptoms without attributions
Associations of third person auditory hallucinations, first-rank delusions
and narrowly defined psychosis-like symptoms with birth measures were in the
same direction, but slightly weaker than those with the definite
psychosis-like symptoms outcome. A one standard deviation increase in birth
weight was associated with 11% (OR per standard deviation increase in birth
weight = 0.89, 95% CI 0.69–1.16, P = 0.39), 13% (OR = 0.87, 95%
CI 0.73–1.03, P = 0.10) and 12% (OR = 0.88, 95% CI
0.76–1.02, P = 0.10) lower odds of each outcome. However, the
lower prevalence (1.1%, 2.9% and 3.7% respectively) of these end-points
resulting from the more stringent classification meant that statistical power
to detect differences was reduced. The association with frequently occurring
definite psychosis-like symptoms without attributions was similar to the other
psychosis-like symptoms outcomes for birth weight (OR per standard deviation
increase = 0.77, 95% CI 0.64–0.91, P = 0.003). The association
for birth length was stronger than for previous psychosis-like symptoms
outcomes (OR per standard deviation increase = 0.74, 95% CI 0.60–0.91,
P = 0.004).
Adjusting for potential confounders
Table 1 summarises the
multivariable logistic regression models investigating the impact of a series
of potential confounding factors on the association of the three birth
measures with definite psychosis-like symptoms. Column A presents the fully
adjusted ORs of each birth measure in relation to psychosis-like symptoms for
the full data-set (already presented in online Table DS2). For each of the
potential confounders/factors possibly on the causal pathway (IQ), the table
initially presents the age- and gestation-adjusted associations with
psychosis-like symptoms in the subset of participants with complete data on
the confounding factor of interest and psychosis-like symptoms (column B).
Column C then shows the association for the birth measure with psychosis-like
symptoms after controlling for each named confounder. Controlling for paternal
height and weight, family history of schizophrenia, maternal and paternal age,
or parity and household crowding did not change the effect estimates (results
not presented).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
Table 1 The association of indicators of fetal growth with psychosis-like
symptoms (definite cases only) adjusting for potential confounders and factors
possibly lying on causal pathways
|
The confounders that have an effect on the estimates are: maternal anthropometry, maternal smoking during pregnancy, parental socioeconomic status and IQ at age 8 years. Of the two measures of maternal anthropometry examined (maternal height and weight), it was adjustment for maternal height that was responsible for the attenuation. When the confounding effect of all these variables (maternal anthropometry, maternal smoking during pregnancy, socioeconomic status and IQ) in relation to the birth weight with psychosis-like symptoms association was assessed (n = 4038 participants), the OR per standard deviation change in birth weight attenuated from 0.90 (95% CI 0.77–1.04) to 0.95 (95% CI 0.81–1.11).
Measures at age 7.5 years
There was generally no statistical evidence for an association of height
and adiposity measured at age 7.5 years with psychosis-like symptoms at age 12
years (Table 2). There was weak
evidence that association of height with psychosis-like symptoms differed in
males and females (P (interaction) = 0.15). The OR per standard
deviation increase in height was 0.87 (95% CI 0.73–1.05, P =
0.15) in males and 1.03 (95% CI 0.88–1.20, P = 0.74) in
females. There was no statistical evidence for an association of height and
adiposity for further psychosis-like symptoms outcomes of narrowly defined
psychosis-like symptoms and frequently occurring definite psychosis-like
symptoms without attributions. The effect estimates for size at 7.5 years did
not change when adjusting for potential confounders (results not
presented).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
Table 2 The association (odds ratio, 95% CI) of measures of height and adiposity
at age 7.5 years with psychosis-like
symptomsa
|
We looked at birth measures in relation to size at 7.5 years. There was no statistical evidence that associations for BMI differed in relation to birth weight (P (interaction) = 0.87). For height at 7.5 years there was statistical evidence of an interaction with birth weight (P (interaction) = 0.006). However, there was no clear patterning to stratified associations so this may be a chance finding. Statistical evidence that associations with birth length differed depending on height at age 7.5 was weak (P (interaction) = 0.14).
|
|
|---|
Strengths and limitations
There are several strengths to our study. First, ALSPAC is a large
population-based cohort and because of the large sample size, we had
sufficient power to detect potentially important associations. Second, as
fetal and childhood growth were recorded prospectively and were based on
clinical measurements (rather than being self-reported), recall bias is not an
issue and the possibility of measurement error is reduced. Lastly, careful
quality control procedures were adopted to ensure psychosis-like symptoms were
reliably recorded: in associated reliability studies the average overall
interrater reliability was very good (
=
0.72).5
The main limitation to this study is the current uncertainty concerning the clinical significance of self-reported psychosis-like symptoms in childhood and its association with clinical psychosis. The Dunedin cohort is the only study to have examined this association to date.1 Further follow-up of ALSPAC and other cohorts will elucidate this issue. Another drawback of our study is attrition from the cohort over time, with levels of losses to follow-up similar to those seen in other large-scale longitudinal studies.21,22 As heavier babies were more likely to attend the clinic where psychosis-like symptoms were measured, this could result in an underestimate of the birth weight and birth length associations observed, if children experiencing psychosis-like symptoms are less likely to attend the clinics. An additional limitation to this study is that although information was available on family history of schizophrenia, there was no information regarding family histories of other Axis I disorders. Another limitation was that because of organisational constraints on the interview time we focused entirely on the careful measurement of psychosis-like symptoms. It was therefore not possible to extend the interview with other measures such as interpersonal functioning and clinical treatment history, and it was not thus possible to identify those psychosis-like symptom-positive children who may have had a fully developed childhood schizophrenic or other psychotic clinical disorder. However, given the extremely low prevalence of childhood psychosis23 we do not think this influences the validity of our findings.
Comparison with other studies
Associations of low birth weight (<2.0kg/<2.5kg) with an increased
risk of schizophrenia have been reported in a number of studies (see review by
Cannon et
al).9 However,
the largest study of the relationship between birth weight and clinically
treated schizophrenia, based on 736 incident cases identified within a Swedish
record-linkage study of psychiatric hospital admissions, found no evidence of
such an
association.7 Birth
length was, however, inversely related to risk in the same study; the OR per
10 cm increase in birth length was 0.53 (95% CI
0.31–0.89),7
similar to that seen in the present study in relation to psychosis-like
symptoms (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.20–0.89). It should be noted that a 10 cm
increase in birth length is a large change (approximately 5 standard
deviations) so the magnitude (and clinical relevance) of this association
should be interpreted cautiously. In the Swedish study, in contrast to our
analysis of ALSPAC participants, birth length–schizophrenia associations
were not attenuated when birth weight was controlled for in the multivariable
models. In a previous analysis of ALSPAC data, Wiles et al found that
short birth length, but not birth weight, was associated with an increased
risk of behavioural difficulties at age 7
years.24
An emerging body of literature suggests that low BMI in childhood8 and early adulthood7,25,26 is associated with an increased risk of psychosis. Furthermore, short height in adulthood7 but not childhood8 has also been shown to be associated with an increased risk of psychosis. However, we found no real evidence of an association with BMI or height in our analysis. If psychosis-like symptoms are indeed a marker of later risk of psychosis, the mismatch between the associations of our childhood measures of height and BMI with psychosis-like symptoms compared with those seen in the literature could be as a result of our limited power to detect such relatively weak associations, or because factors influencing height and weight are important in determining which people with psychosis-like symptoms go on to develop psychosis, rather than being of importance in the aetiology of psychosis-like symptoms per se.
Aetiology of psychosis-like symptoms and implications for treatment and prognosis
A growing body of scientific evidence indicates that schizophrenia is a
disorder of neurodevelopment and brain
maturation.27
Psychosis-like symptoms may be an important component of a pan-developmental
process and eventually, as these children are followed up further, could be
associated with `prodomal' indicators such as decline and withdrawal. Our
findings of an association between measures of fetal growth and psychosis-like
symptoms provide some support for their status as developmental antecedents of
adult-onset psychosis, with a possible common origin in prenatal development
factors. However, notwithstanding the association with fetal growth reported
here, it has been suggested that psychosis-like symptoms may be a general
indicator of emotional problems in childhood that act as a risk factor for
later psychosis, rather than being part of a developmental `continuum' with
adult-onset schizophrenia (details available from the author on request).
These findings at age 12 years are especially intriguing because the
participants have not passed through adolescence and all of the
neuromaturational factors potentially contributing to an exacerbation in
psychosis-like symptoms (e.g. synaptic pruning, heightened cortisol) have not
occurred. The long-term clinical consequences of experiencing psychosis-like
symptoms in childhood remain uncertain. In the Dunedin cohort the presence of
psychosis-like symptoms at age 11 was associated with a fivefold risk of later
psychosis. Further studies of this issue are required and long-term follow-up
of the ALSPAC cohort – a study approximately ten times larger than
Dunedin – will help clarify the aetiological, and hence clinical,
significance of psychosis-like symptoms. Our study adds to the growing body of
literature examining psychosis-like symptoms in the ALSPAC
cohort.5,28,29
These findings provide mixed evidence to support commonality in associations of birth and childhood anthropometry with psychosis-like symptoms at 12 years of age and adult-onset psychosis. The results indicate support for associations of fetal growth and psychosis-like symptoms, but not for postnatal exposures and psychosis-like symptoms at 12 years. As birth weight associations were only partially attenuated in models controlling for IQ, it seems likely that cognitive function does not lie on the causal pathway between prenatal influences on growth and psychosis-like symptoms.
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related articles in BJP:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||