Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:21:18.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrical Treatment of Anxiety States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. D. Montagu  and
L. S. Davies
J. D. Montagu
Affiliation:
Runwell Hospital, Wickford, Essex
L. S. Davies
Affiliation:
Roffey Park Rehabilitation Centre, Horsham, Sussex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the past five years a number of reports have acclaimed Subconvulsive Electrostimulation as a therapeutic measure for the relief of states of anxiety and tension. In general, these accounts have proved unconvincing, since the authors have seldom provided either controls or even details of their results. The report of Hargrove, Bennett and Ford (1953) has been the only exception to both of these criticisms—and the only adverse account. The present investigation was therefore conducted as a “blind” trial in order to provide an unbiassed evaluation of the subject. The series comprised 100 patients, half of whom received the electrical treatment while the other half were subjected to a control procedure. Objective evidence was furnished by psychometric tests. An autonomic test of reputed prognostic significance, and a follow-up study, were also included.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 101 , Issue 424 , July 1955 , pp. 577 - 592
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1955 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, L., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1950, 107, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , Treatment of Mental Disorders, 1953. Philadelphia and London: Saunders.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , Brit. med. J., 1952, ii, 1196.Google Scholar
Berkwitz, N. J., Dis. nerv. Syst., 1952, 13, 323.Google Scholar
Berliner, H. M., and Schartenberg, F. L., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1952, 109, 433.Google Scholar
Crown, S., Brit. J. Psychol., 1952, 43, 103.Google Scholar
Foulds, G. A., Ibid., 1951, 42, 209.Google Scholar
Funkenstein, D. H., Greenblatt, M., and Solomon, H. C., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1949a, 106, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iidem , Ibid., 1949b, 106, 116.Google Scholar
Iidem , J. nerv. ment. Dis., 1951, 114, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iidem , Psychosom. Med., 1952, 14, 347.Google Scholar
Hargrove, E. A., Bennett, A. E., and Ford, F. R., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1953, 109, 612.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, G. R., Presented before the New Jersey Neuropsychiatric Association at Lyons Hospital, 20 April, 1949.Google Scholar
Idem , Psychiat. Quart. Supply 1950, 24, 297.Google Scholar
Idem , J. nerv. ment. Dis., 1953, 117, 323.Google Scholar
Idem and Bell, J., Dis. nerv. Syst., 1951, 12, 264.Google Scholar
Montagu, J. D., J. ment. Sci., 1955, in the Press. Google Scholar
Paterson, A. S., and Conachy, A., Brit. med. J., 1952, 2, 1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, P. H., Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry, Vol. VI, ed. Spiegel, E. A., 1951, p. 486. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Idem , Confin. neurol., Basel, 1953, 13, 300.Google Scholar
Yanof, Z. A., Ibid., 1952, 12, 364.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.