Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:33:42.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Problem of Agnosia in the Light of a Case of Pure Word Deafness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

R. Klein  and
J. Harper
R. Klein
Affiliation:
Crichton Royal, Dumfries
J. Harper
Affiliation:
Crichton Royal, Dumfries
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although pure word deafness (p.w.d.) is a well-defined clinical picture it usually occurs as part of a more complex syndrome. Almost invariably there is some degree of aphasia and as a rule other auditory disturbances, such as imperception of specific sounds including musical tones, also occur. These associated symptoms tend to diminish or even disappear in time while the deafness for word sounds usually persists in its initial intensity. In the case we describe most of the associated symptoms, especially the aphasia, soon abated leaving an almost pure word deafness. Subsequently this too improved slowly and because of the partial recovery we were able to obtain data which are rarely available in these cases.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 102 , Issue 426 , January 1956 , pp. 112 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1956 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonvicini, G., Jahrb. Psych. and New., 1905, 26, 126.Google Scholar
Critchley, M., The Parietal Lobes, 1953. London.Google Scholar
Goldstein, K., Zeitsch. Neur. and Psych., 1926, 19, 3, 292.Google Scholar
Idem and Gelb, A., Ibid, 1918, 41, 1.Google Scholar
Henneberg, R., Msch. Psych. and Neur., 1906, 19, 17, 159.Google Scholar
Klein, R., Msch. Psych. and Neur., 1927, 64, 354.Google Scholar
Liepmann, H., and Storch, E., Msch. Psych. and Neur., 1902, 11, 115.Google Scholar
Pick, A., Arch. f. Psych., 1896, 28, 1.Google Scholar
Reinhold, M., Brain, 1950, 73, 203.Google Scholar
Schuster, P., and Taterka, H., Zeitsch. Neur. and Psych., 1926, 105, 494.Google Scholar
Stengel, E., and Hemphill, R. E., J. Neur. and Psych., 1940, 3, 251.Google Scholar
Stertz, G., Msch. Psych. and Neur., 1912, 32, 327.Google Scholar
Ziegler, D. K., Arch. Neur. and Psych., 1952, 67, 323.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.