Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:22:35.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hypnagogic Imagery and Mescaline

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. Amor Ardis
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, University of Aberdeen
Peter McKellar
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Aberdeen

Extract

Similarity between certain of the visual effects of mescaline and hypnagogic imagery has been independently noted by several investigators, one of the earliest of these being Weir Mitchell (1896). Our own research group first became interested in hypnagogic experiences when one of the writers, as subject, in seeking to communicate the character of his mescaline visions, likened them to images he had encountered just before sleep. This led to an investigation of hypnagogic imagery as such, the results of which have been published elsewhere (McKellar and Simpson, 1954). Further experiments with mescaline, and consideration of the relevant literature of the two fields, suggest that the mescaline-induced and hypnagogic states are more than superficially alike, and that a comparison may illuminate the processes at work in each.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1956 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ardis, J. A., and Drewery, J., “Studies in the Model Psychoses”. Communication to Scottish Division, R.M.P.A., Aberdeen, October, 1954.Google Scholar
Bexton, W. H., Heron, W., and Scott, T. H., Canad. J. Psychol., 1954, 8, 70.Google Scholar
Ellis, Havelock, Lancet, 1897, i, 1540.Google Scholar
Idem , The World of Dreams, 1911. New York: Constable.Google Scholar
Freud, S., The Interpretation of Dreams, 1900. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Galton, F., Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development, 1883. London: (Everyman Edition, 1919).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gombrich, E. H., Personal communication, 1955.Google Scholar
Guttmann, E., J. Ment. Sci., 1936, 82, 203.Google Scholar
James, W., Psychology: Briefer Course, 1892, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Klüver, H., Mescal. the Divine Plant and its Psychological Effects, 1928. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Idem , Studies in Personality, 1942, Ch. 10, New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Leaning, F. E., Proc. Soc. Psychic. Res., 1925, 35, 289.Google Scholar
Idem , et al., J. Soc. Psychic. Res., 1925a, 22, 146.Google Scholar
Lindemann, E., and Clark, L. D., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1952, 108, 565.Google Scholar
McKellar, P., and Simpson, L., Brit. J. Psychol., 1954, 45, 266.Google Scholar
Marinesco, G., Presse Méd., 1933, 41, 1433.Google Scholar
Maury, A., Ann. Méd.-Psychol., 1848, 11, 26.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W., Brit. Med. J., 1951, ii, 317.Google Scholar
Idem , Slater, E., and Roth, M., Clinical Psychiatry, 1954. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. Weir., Brit. Med. J., 1896, ii, 1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentiss, D. W., and Morgan, F. P., Therap. Gaz. 3rd series, 1895, 11, 577.Google Scholar
Silberer, H., Organisation and Pathology of Thought, 1909, Ch. 8. New York: Columbia Univ. Press (Edition 1951).Google Scholar
Simpson, L., and McKellar, P., J. Ment. Sci., 1955, 100, 141.Google Scholar
Warren, H. C., Dictionary of Psychology, 1934. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.