Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:31:12.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of Vocabulary in the Measurement of Intellectual Deterioration—A Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Aubrey J. Yates
Aubrey J. Yates*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The problem of determining whether or not a particular individual has deteriorated intellectually or with respect to other skills is one which has exercised the ingenuity of clinical psychologists for a long time. Clearly the most satisfactory method from the point of view of reliability and validity is by means of the test-retest method over a given period of time, using tests for which adequate statistical information is available. However, since a direct estimate of the individual's previous level of intelligence is usually not available and since the psychologist often cannot wait six months or longer to obtain a direct retest, some method had to be devised which would overcome this difficulty. Babcock (1930) hit on the method of using the Vocabulary test as an estimate of previous level of intellectual ability and contrasting it with performance on other tests supposedly sensitive to deterioration in order to measure the amount of decline which had taken place.

Some aspects of the use of vocabulary in clinical psychological testing have been reviewed by a number of writers (Cronbach, 1942; Feifel, 1949; Hunt, 1936; Jastak, 1949; Lewinski, 1948; Raven and Walshaw, 1944; Shakow, 1946), and the immense interest shown in vocabulary as a test may be inferred from the 101-page bibliography of vocabulary studies published by Dale (1949). However, previous reviews suffer from two defects in that (a) they do not attempt to cover the ground thoroughly or systematically, being usually introductory to an experiment, or not specifically concerned with the subject matter of this paper; and (b) they naturally give no information about the important research which has taken place in this field within the last few years. The present review has been undertaken for these reasons, and because of the intrinsic importance of the problem.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 102 , Issue 428 , July 1956 , pp. 409 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1956 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackelsberg, S. B., J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1944, 39, 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, R. M., J. Clin. Psychol., 1947, 3, 225–230.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, C. H., and Shakow, D., J. Educ. Psychol., 1937, 28, 519–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altus, W. D., J. Consult. Psychol., 1946, 10, 268–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , J. Soc. Psychol., 1950, 31, 299–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammons, R. B., and Aguero, A., J. Soc. Psychol., 1950, 32, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammons, R. B., and Ammons, H., The Full Range Picture Vocabulary Test, 1948. New Orleans.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammons, R. B., and Homes, J. C., Child Devlpmt., 1949, 20, 5–14.Google Scholar
Ammons, R. B., and Huth, R. W., J. Psychol., 1949, 28, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammons, R. B., and Manahan, N., J. Educ. Res., 1950, 44, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, I. H., and Fairbanks, G., J. Educ. Res., 1937, 30, 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atwell, C. R., and Wells, F. L., J. Appl. Psychol., 1937, 21, 550–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, H., Arch. Psychol., 1930, No. 117.Google Scholar
Idem , Dementia Praecox: a Psychological Study, 1933. Lancaster P.A.: Science Press Printing Co.Google Scholar
Barke, E. M., and Williams, D. E. P., Brit. J. Educ. Psychol., 1938, 8, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijou, S. W., and Werner, H., Amer. J. Ment. Def., 1944, 48, 364–366.Google Scholar
Bonnardel, R., Travail. Hum., 1951, 14, 77–89.Google Scholar
Botwinick, J., J. Consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 225–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem and Birren, J. E., J. Geront., 1951a, 6, 365–368.Google Scholar
Idem , J. Consult. Psychol., 1951b, 15, 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, M. B., J. Ment. Sci., 1940, 86, 532–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. M., Amer. Psychol., 1948, 3, 372.Google Scholar
Burton, M., School Rev., 1944, 52, 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canter, A. H., J. Gen. Psychol., 1951, 44, 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capps, H. M., Arch. Psychol., 1939, No. 242.Google Scholar
Carlton, T., J. Genet. Psychol., 1942, 61, 321–326.Google Scholar
Carter, H. D., Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1931, 10, 1–104.Google Scholar
Chodorkoff, B., and Mussen, P., J. Consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, A. M., and Paterson, D. G., J. Psychol., 1936, 1, 167–169.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 1952a, 47, 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , J. Consult. Psychol., 1952b, 16, 272–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppinger, N. W., and Ammons, R. B., J. Clin. Psychol., 1952, 8, 136–140.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsini, R., J. Clin. Psychol., 1951, 7, 127–130.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., J. Educ. Res., 1942, 36, 206–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crown, S., Brit. Med. J., 1949, ii, 684–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , J. Ment. Sci., 1951, 97, 49–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , Brit. J. Psychol., 1952a, 43, 103–112.Google Scholar
Idem , J. Gen. Psychol., 1952b, 47, 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , J. Consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuff, N. B., J. Genet. Psychol., 1935, 46, 226–229.Google Scholar
Cureton, E. E., Proc. 1948 Conf. Test Probl. Educ. Test Serv., 1949, 47–49.Google Scholar
Idem , J. Consult. Psychol., 1954, 18, 381–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, E., Bibliography of Vocabulary Studies, 1949. Bur. Educ. Res., Ohio State Univers.Google Scholar
Darcy, N. T., J. Educ. Psychol., 1946, 37, 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, M., Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1937, 17, 93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1939, 18, 44–52.Google Scholar
Davis, E. A., Amer. J. Psychol., 1937, 49, 315–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, M. M.,J. Consult. Psychol., 1955, 19.Google Scholar
Dolch, E. W., J. Educ. Res., 1932, 26, 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1951, 44, 457–470.Google Scholar
Doppelt, J. E., and Wallace, W. L., J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1955, 51, 312–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunsdon, M. I., and Roberts, J. A. F., Brit. J. Stat. Psychol., 1953, 6, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1955, 8, 3–15.Google Scholar
Eels, K., Davis, A., Havighurst, J., Herrick, V. E., and Tyler, R. W., Intelligence and Cultural Differences: a Study of Cultural Learning and Problem Solving, 1951. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Elwood, M. I., J. Educ. Psychol., 1939, 30, 632–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estes, S. G., J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1946, 41, 226–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feifel, H., Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1949, 39, 151–204.Google Scholar
Idem , J. Psychol., 1952, 33, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem and Lorge, I., J. Educ. Psychol., 1950, 41, 1–18.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, M., Gerboth, R., and Westerhold, R., J. Clin. Psychol., 1952, 8, 133–135.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, V. V., J. Genet. Psychol., 1942, 60, 359–373.Google Scholar
Foulds, G. A., Amer. J. Psychol., 1949, 62, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, C., J. Educ. Psychol., 1947, 38, 482–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, C., and Birren, J. E., J. Geront., 1949, 4, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , J. Consult. Psychol., 1950a, 14, 305–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , J. Genet. Psychol., 1950b, 77, 313–317.Google Scholar
French, E. G., and Hunt, W. A., J. Clin. Psychol., 1951, 7, 95–98.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gansl, I., Arch. Psychol., 1939, No. 236.Google Scholar
Garfield, S. L., and Blek, L., J. Consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 395–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfield, S. L., and Fey, W. F., J. Consult. Psychol., 1948, 12, 259–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrison, K. C., J. Educ. Res., 1930, 21, 43–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstein, R. A., J. Consult. Psychol., 1949, 13, 366–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gewirtz, J. L., J. Genet. Psychol., 1948a, 72, 165–176.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1948b, 72, 177–184.Google Scholar
Gilbert, J. G., Arch Psychol., 1935, No. 188.Google Scholar
Glik, E. E., J. Clin. Psychol., 1951, 7, 157–162.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottschalk, A. J., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1942, 98, 839–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamister, R. C., J. Consult. Psychol. 1949, 13, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlin, R. M., Arch. Psychol., 1944, No. 293.Google Scholar
Harrington, R., and Ehrmann, J. C., J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 362–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, G. W., J. Educ. Psychol., 1946, 37, 436–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heston, J. C., and Cannell, C. F., J. Appl. Psychol., 1941, 25, 415–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himmelweit, H. T., J. Person., 1945, 14, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, B., and Roth, M., J. Ment. Sci., 1953, 99, 451–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, R. J., J. Consult. Psychol., 1955, 19, 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, H. F., J. Appl. Psychol., 1943, 27, 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. McV., Psychol. Bull., 1936, 33, 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. T., J. Educ. Psychol., 1953, 44, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, W. A., and French, E. G., J. Consult. Psychol., 1949a, 13, 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1949b, 13, 124–126.Google Scholar
Idem , J. Clin. Psychol., 1952, 8, 65–74.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , Klebanoff, S. G., Mensh, I. N., and Williams, M., J. Consult. Psychol., 1948a, 12, 171–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1948b, 12, 355–359.Google Scholar
Hunt, W. A., Klebanoff, S. G., Mensh, I. N., and Williams, M., J. Consult. Psychol., 1948, 12, 48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irmina, Sister M., Cath. Univers. Amer. Educ. Res. Bull., 1927, 2, No. 1.Google Scholar
Jastak, J., Psychol. Bull., 1949, 46, 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , J. Consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 403–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. M., and Reynolds, F., Psychol. Rec., 1941, 4, 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L. W., J. Educ. Psychol., 1938, 29, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juckem, H., and Wold, J. A., J. Consult. Psychol., 1948, 12, 53–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, J. J., and Cureton, E. E., J. Appl. Psychol., 1949, 33, 347 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruglov, L. P., J. Educ. Psychol., 1953, 44, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, J., and Stacey, C. L., J. Educ. Psychol., 1951, 42, 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewinski, R. J., Educ. Psychol. Measmt., 1946, 6, 253–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , J. Genet. Psychol., 1948, 72, 247–281.Google Scholar
Louden, M. V., J. Educ. Res., 1933a, 26, 601–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1933b, 27, 179–186.Google Scholar
Lovell, D. G., J. Educ. Psychol., 1941, 32, 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNemar, Q., The Revision of the Stanford-Binet Scale, 1942. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Madonick, M. J., and Solomon, M., Geriatrics, 1947, 2, 34–40.Google Scholar
Mahan, H. C., and Witmer, L., J. Appl. Psychol., 1936, 20, 258–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malamud, W., and Palmer, E. M., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1938, 39, 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmo, R. B., Res. Publ. Ass. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1948, 27, 537–564.Google Scholar
Manson, M. P., and Grayson, H. M., J. Appl. Psychol., 1947, 31, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markwell, E. D., Wheeler, W. M., and Kitzinger, H., J. Consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 229–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, R. M., and Heathers, L. B., J. Consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 469–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, V., and Yates, A. J., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 1955, 18, 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, W. R., in Cowdry, E. V. (Ed.), Problems of Ageing, 1939. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Moldawskys, S., and Moldawsky, P. C., J. Consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 115–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. K., J. Exp. Educ., 1947, 16, 122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, L. J., Psychol. Monogr., 1953, 67 (Whole No. 370).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , Moran, F. A., and Blake, R. R., J. Genet. Psychol., 1952a, 80, 97–105.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1952b, 80, 107–132.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1952c, 80, 141–150.Google Scholar
Morgan, B. Q., and Oberdeck, L. M., in Siudies in Modern Language Teaching, 1930. New York: Macmillan. Pp. 213–221.Google Scholar
Nelson, E. H., Unpubl. Ph.D. Thesis, Univer. of London Lib., 1953.Google Scholar
Norman, R. D., J. Consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 411–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberlin, D. S., Delaware State Med. J., 1937, 9, 95–98.Google Scholar
Papania, N., J. Clin. Psychol., 1954, 10, 361–365.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrie, A., Personality and the Frontal Lobes. An Investigation of the Psychological Effects of Different Types of Leucotomy, 1952. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pichot, P., and Rennes, P., Rev. Psychol. Appl., 1952, 2, 313–318.Google Scholar
Rabin, A. I., J. Educ. Psychol., 1944, 35, 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , J. Gen. Psychol., 1945, 32, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , J. Consult. Psychol., 1947, 11, 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , King, G. F., and Ehrmann, J. C., J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1955, 50, 255–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapaport, D., Gill, M., and Schafer, R., Diagnostic Psychological Testing, 1945, 1, Chicago: Year Book Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, S. R., J. Clin. Psychol., 1951, 7, 335–340.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , J. Consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, J. C., Guide to Using the Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale with Progressive Matrices (1938), 1948a. London: H. K. Lewis & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Idem , Brit. J. Psychol., 1948b, 39, 12–19.Google Scholar
Idem and Walshaw, J. B., Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1944, 20, 185–194.Google Scholar
Reichard, S., Schneider, M., and Rapaport, D., Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 1944, 14, 156–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, A., and Shakow, D., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1942, 42, 361–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, L. S., J. Consult. Psychol., 1951, 15, 151–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, M., and Hopkins, B., J. Ment. Sci., 1953, 99, 439–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saer, D. J., Brit. J. Psychol., 1923, 14, 25–38.Google Scholar
Saltzman, S., J. Soc. Psychol., 1940, 12, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, G. I., J. Soc. Psychol., 1934, 5, 395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnadt, F., J. Consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 456–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, D. G., J. Educ. Res., 1953, 46, 555–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulman, M. J., and Havighurst, R. J., J. Educ. Psychol., 1947, 38, 437–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seashore, R. H., and Eckerson, L. D., J. Educ. Psychol., 1940, 31, 14–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selling, L. S., and Stein, S. P., Amer. J. Sociol., 1934, 39, 674–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Severn, D. J., J. Consult. Psychol. 1949, 13, 144–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakow, D., Nerv. Ment. Dis. Monogr., 1946, No. 70.Google Scholar
Idem and Goldman, R., J. Educ. Psychol., 1938, 29, 241–256.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. B., and Nelson, E., Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1955, 28, 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipley, W. C., J. Psychol., 1940, 9, 371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem and Burlingame, C. C., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1941, 97, 1313–1325.Google Scholar
Simmins, C. A., J. Ment. Sci., 1933, 79, 704–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, V. M., J. Educ. Res., 1929, 20, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, P., Brit. J. Psychol., 1945, 35, 40–42.Google Scholar
Sorenson, H., J. Appl. Psychol., 1933, 17, 729–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spache, G., J. Educ. Res., 1943, 36, 512–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, C. L., and Portnoy, B., J. Clin. Psychol., 1950, 6, 401–403.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1951, 7, 144–148.Google Scholar
Stacey, C. L., and Spanier, S. W., J. Educ. Psychol., 1954, 45, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ström-Olsen, R., Last, S. L., and Brody, M. B., J. Ment. Sci., 1943, 89, 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sward, K., Amer. J. Psychol., 1945, 58, 443–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terman, L. M., and Merrill, M. A., Measuring Intelligence, 1937. London: Harrap.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L., Primary Mental Abilities (Psychometric Monographs, No. 1), 1938. Chicago: Univer. Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Idem , Factorial Studies of Intelligence (Psychometric Monographs, No. 2), 1941. Chicago: Univer. Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tinker, M. A., Hackner, F., and Wesley, M. W., J. Educ. Psychol., 1940, 31, 575–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Alstyne, D., The Van Alstyne Picture Vocabulary Test for Preschool Children, 1929. Bloomington, Ill.: Public School Publ. Co.Google Scholar
Vernon, P. E., Brit. J. Educ. Psychol., 1950, 20, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldfogel, S., and Guy, W., J. Clin. Psychol., 1951, 7, 135–139.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, W. B., and De Haan, H., J. Consult. Psychol., 1951, 15, 68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, W. B., and Haner, C., Educ. Psychol. Measrmt., 1949, 9, 693–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D., The Measurement of Adult Intelligence, 1944. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Idem , Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 1955. New York: Psychol. Corp.Google Scholar
Weisenberg, T., Roe, A., and McBride, K. E., Adult Intelligence, 1936. New York: Commonwealth Fund.Google Scholar
Wesman, A. G., and Seashore, H. G., J. Educ. Psychol., 1949, 40, 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. L., Psychol. Rec., 1942, 5, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, F. T., Element. Sch. J., 1937, 37, 451–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yacorzynski, G. K., Psychol. Rev., 1941, 48, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, A. J., Psychol. Bull., 1954, 51, 359–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zubin, J., and Windle, C., J. Clin. Psychol., 1951, 7, 221–223.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.