Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T02:32:27.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neurosis and Experimental Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

H. Gwynne Jones*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry (Maudsley Hospital), University of London

Extract

Genetic factors have been shown to play an important role in the development of neurosis. These factors, however, determine the vulnerability of an individual, the degree of his predisposition for neurotic breakdown, while the available evidence indicates that the actual behavioural disturbance results from the imposition of some form of environmental stress on the individual concerned. The probability that any particular individual will develop a neurosis is partly determined by his genetic constitution and partly by the degree of stress to which he is subjected.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1958 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davidson, J. R., and Douglass, E., “Nocturnal enuresis: a special approach to treatment”. Brit. Med. J., 1950, i, 1345.Google Scholar
Dollard, J., and Miller, N. E., Personality and Psychotherapy: an analysis in terms of learning; thinking and culture; 1950. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Dunlap, K., Habits: their making and unmaking, 1932. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Estes, W. K., “An experimental study of punishment”, Psychol. Monogr., 1944, 57, No. 263.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., “A dynamic theory of anxiety and hysteria”, J. Ment. Sci., 1955, 101, 28.Google Scholar
Herzberg, A., “Short treatment of neuroses by graduated tasks”, Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1941, 19, 36.Google Scholar
Idem, Active Psychotherapy, 1945. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Hurwitz, H. M. B., “Response elimination without performance”, Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 1955, 7, 1.Google Scholar
Jersild, A. T., and Holmes, F. B., “Methods of overcoming children's fears”, J. Psychol., 1935, 1, 75.Google Scholar
Jones, H. G., “The application of conditioning and learning techniques to the treatment of a psychiatric patient”, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1956, 52, 414.Google Scholar
Lacey, J. I., Bateman, D. E., and Van Lehn, R., “Autonomic response specificity”, Psychosom. Med., 1953, 15, 8.Google Scholar
LIVERSEDGE, L. A., and Sylvester, J. D., “Conditioning techniques in the treatment of writer's cramp”, Lancet, 1955, i, 1147.Google Scholar
Meyer, V., “The treatment of two phobic patients on the basis of learning principles”, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1957. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowrer, O. H., Learning theory and personality dynamics, 1950. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Idem and Mowrer, W. M., “Enuresis. A method for its study and treatment”, Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 1938, 8, 436.Google Scholar
Idem and Viek, P., “An experimental analogue of fear from a sense of helplessness”, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1948, 43, 193.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. L., and Brush, E. S., “Experimentally derived conceptions of anxiety and aversion”, in Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1956 (ed. Jones, M. R.). University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Idem and Wynne, L. C., “Traumatic avoidance learning: the principles of anxiety conservation and partial irreversibility”, Psychol. Rev., 1954, 61, 353.Google Scholar
Wolpe, J., “Experimental neuroses as learned behaviour”, Brit. J. Psychol., 1952, 43, 243.Google Scholar
Idem , “Reciprocal inhibition as the main basis of psychotherapeutic effects”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1954, 72, 205.Google Scholar
Yates, A. J., J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1957. In press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.