Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:48:34.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relationship Between Glucose Tolerance, Body Weight, and Clinical State in Melancholia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

I. G. Pryce
I. G. Pryce*
Affiliation:
Runwell Hospital, Wickford, Essex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent investigation the present author has shown that glucose tolerance (G.T.) was significantly lower in a group of middle-aged mental hospital patients suffering from severe depression, than in a non-psychiatric group of similar age distribution (Pryce, 1958). This observation is similar to many others reported earlier (see review by McFarland and Goldstein, 1939). The cause of this impairment of G.T. is unknown; it cannot be explained by defective absorption of glucose from the alimentary canal since an intravenous G.T. test was employed in the investigation mentioned. Again, defective dietary intake during the days before testing could have contributed to the decreased G.T. in only a few cases; there was also no correlation between G.T. and either general symptomatology or the patients' behaviour during testing. However, it was observed that the group of depressions weighed significantly less than the control group, though again no correlation was found between body weight and G.T. among the depressions themselves. McCowan and Quastel (1931) and others have reported a close parallel between decreased G.T. and “emotional tension”, evidence which favours an emotional cause for the phenomenon, in line with the theories of W. B. Cannon (1911).

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 104 , Issue 437 , October 1958 , pp. 1079 - 1092
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1958 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, C. K., A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1948, 60, 498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altschule, M. D., and Tillotson, K. J., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1948–49, 105, 829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amatuzio, D., Stutzman, F., Vanderbilt, M., and Nesbitt, S., J. Clin. Invest., 1953, 32, 428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asatoor, A. M., and King, E. J., Biochem. J., 1954, 56, xliv.Google Scholar
Board, F., Wadeson, R., and Persky, H., A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1957, 78, 612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, K. M., and Kasanin, J., ibid., 1929, 21, 342.Google Scholar
Cannon, W. B., Shohl, A. T., and Wright, W. S., Amer. J. Physiol., 1911, 29, 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crammer, J. L., Lancet, 1957, ii, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demanet, J. C., De Meutter, R. C., and Gepts, W., Acta Endocrinol., 1958, 27, 281.Google Scholar
Duncan, L. J. P., Quart. J. Exp. Physiol., 1956, 41, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A., and Yates, F., Statistical Tables, 1953. London.Google Scholar
Freeman, H., Rodnick, E. H., Shakow, D., and Lebaux, T., Psychosom. Med., 1944, 6, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , and Zaborenke, R., A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1949, 61, 569.Google Scholar
Glynn, A., Nature, 1945, 155, 366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, G. W., A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1955, 73, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, G. A., Chemical Methods in Clinical Medicine, 1949. London, p. 150.Google Scholar
Herdan, G., Statistics of Therapeutic Trials, 1955. London.Google Scholar
Holmgren, H., and Wohlfahrt, S., Acta Psychiat. Neurol. Scand., 1944, Suppl. 31.Google Scholar
Ikkos, R., and Luft, R., Acta. Endocrinol., 1957, 25, 312.Google Scholar
Katzenelbogen, S., and Friedman-Buchman, E., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1933, 13, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem and Muncie, W. S., J. nerv. ment. Dis., 1935, 82, 162.Google Scholar
Kooy, F. H., Brain, 1919, 42, 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, H., and Silk, E., Biochem. J., 1952, 50, xxxi.Google Scholar
Mann, S. A., J. Ment. Sci., 1925, 71, 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCowan, P. K., and Quastel, J. H., ibid., 1931, 77, 525.Google Scholar
McFarland, P. A., and Goldstein, H., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1939, 96, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, N., J. Biol. Chem., 1944, 153, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryce, I. G., J. Ment. Sci., 1948, 104, 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , Lancet, 1958, i, 645.Google Scholar
Rames, E. D., and Simon, W., A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1955, 74, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorn, G. W., Renold, A. E., and Winegrad, A. I., Brit. Med. J., 1957, ii, 1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tod, H., Biochem. J., 1935, 29, 914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , Edinburgh Med. J., 1936, 43, 524.Google Scholar
Idem and Jones, M. S., ibid., 1937, 44, 46.Google Scholar
Weil-Malherbe, H., J. Ment. Sci., 1955, 101, 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem and Bone, A. D., ibid., 1951, 97, 635.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.