Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T17:13:44.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Recent Criticisms of the Dimensional Analysis of Personality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

H. J. Eysenck
H. J. Eysenck*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry (Maudsley Hospital), University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent issues of The Journal of Mental Science there have appeared two critical papers (5, 7) dealing with some aspects of the dimensional analysis of personality which the writer has put forward. As replies to these papers separately would seem to require a good deal of repetition, it seemed better to frame a joint reply. This has been kept rather short on purpose, primarily because the writer does not believe that arguments are very helpful to the advancement of science, unless they are accompanied by new data of an experimental kind. In the main, therefore, this reply has restricted itself to simply pointing out that many of the points raised are factually incorrect, or, although they might be correct in themselves, are not relevant to the theory they are criticizing.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 105 , Issue 438 , January 1959 , pp. 220 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1959 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Eysenck, H. J., “Psychiatric diagnosis as a psychological and statistical problem”, Psychol. Rep., 1955, 1, 3–17.Google Scholar
2. Eysenck, H. J., Dynamics of Anxiety and Hysteria, 1957. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
3. Eysenck, H. J., “Classification and the problem of diagnosis”, In: Handbook of Abnormal Psychology (Ed. Eysenck, H. J.), 1959. London: Pitmans.Google Scholar
4. Eysenck, S. B. G., “Neurosis and psychosis: an experimental analysis”, J. Men. Sci., 1956, 102, 517–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Hamilton, V., “Conflict avoidance in obsessionals and hysterics, and the validity of the concept of dysthymia”, J. Ment. Sci., 1957, 103, 666–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hildebrand, H. P., “A factorial study of introversion-extraversion by means of objective tests”, Univ. of London Ph.D. Thesis, 1953.Google Scholar
7. Storms, L. H., “Discrepancies between factor analysis and multivariate discrimination among groups as applied to personality theory”, J. Ment. Sci., 1958, 104, 713–721.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.