Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:55:15.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Size Constancy and Abstract Thinking in Schizophrenic Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

T. E. Weckowicz  and
D. B. Blewett
T. E. Weckowicz
Affiliation:
Saskatchewan Hospital, Weyburn
D. B. Blewett
Affiliation:
Saskatchewan Psychiatric Services
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For many years both clinicians and researchers have been interested in the thought disorders found in schizophrenic patients. Bleuler (4) believed that “weakness” or “looseness” of association was the primary disorder in schizophrenia. However his views were based on the associationist approach to the theory of thinking, which was buried a long time ago by the advent of Gestalt psychology, and even before that by the work of the “Denkpsychologie” school of Würzburg. The founders of the Würzburg School, Külpe, Ach, Watt and Marbe (31, 1, 56, 34) showed conclusively that the thinking process cannot be reduced to association of ideas and they introduced the concepts of “aufgabe” and of “einstellung”, which represented some kind of imageless directional and selective influences in the thought process. A suggestion was made by Paul Schilder (47) that it was this super-ordinate directionality and selectivity of thought process which was affected in schizophrenia. An attempt to apply the principles of formal Aristotelian logic to schizophrenic thinking was made by Von Domarus (17) who found that schizophrenics tended in their propositions to identify the subject with the predicate.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 105 , Issue 441 , October 1959 , pp. 909 - 934
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1959 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ach, N., Ueber die Willenstätigkeit und das Denken, 1905. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
2. Ames, A. Jr., “Reconsideration of the origin and nature of perception”, in Ratner, S. (ed.), Vision and Action, 1953. Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
3. Benjamin, J. D., “A method for distinguishing and evaluating formal thinking disorders in schizophrenia”, in Kasanin, J. S. (ed.), Language and Thought in Schizophrenia, 1944. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
4. Bleuler, E., Dementia Praecox or the Group of Schizophrenias, English translation 1950. New York: International University Press.Google Scholar
5. Bruner, J. S., “Personality dynamics and the process of perceiving”, in Blake, and Ramsey, (eds.), Perception: An Approach to Personality, 1951. Ronald Press.Google Scholar
6. Idem , “Neural mechanisms in perception”, Res. Publ. Ass. nerv. ment. Dis., 1958, 36, 118.Google Scholar
7. Idem , Goodnow, J. J., and Austin, G. A., A Study of Thinking, 1957. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
8. Idem and Postman, L., “Perception cognition and behaviour”, J. Personality, 1949, 18, 206–223.Google Scholar
9. Brunswik, E., “Organismic achievement and environmental probability”, Psychol. Rev., 1943, 50, 255–272.Google Scholar
10. Idem , Systematic and Representative Design of Psychological Experiments, 1947. University of California Press. Series 304.Google Scholar
11. Calloway, E., “Narrowed awareness: a psychological phenomenon that accompanies physiological change”, Unpub. MS.Google Scholar
12. Cameron, N., “The development of paranoic thinking”, Psych. Rev., 1943, 50, 219–233.Google Scholar
13. Idem , “The paranoid pseudo-community”, Amer. J. Sociol., 1943, 49, 32–38.Google Scholar
14. Chapman, L., “Distractibility in conceptual performance of schizophrenics”, J. Abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 53, 3.Google Scholar
15. Chapman, L. J., and Tayler, J. A., “Breadth of deviate concepts used by schizophrenics”, ibid., 1957, 54, 1.Google Scholar
16. Crookes, T. G., “Size constancy and literalness in Rorschach Test”, Brit. J. med. Psychol., 1957, 30, 99.Google Scholar
17. Von Damarus, E., “The specific laws of logic in schizophrenia”, in Kasanin, J. S. (ed.), Language and Thought in Schizophrenia, 1954. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
18. Eysenck, H. J., Granger, G. W., and Brengelmann, J. C., Perceptual Processes and Mental Illness. Maudsley Monograph, 1957. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
19. Gibson, J. J., The Perception of Visual World, 1950. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
20. Goldstein, K., “Methodological approach to the study of schizophrenic thought disorder”, in Kasanin, J. S. (ed.), Language and Thought in Schizophrenia, 1954. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
21. Gottschaldt, K., “Über den Einfluss der Erfahrung auf die Wahrnehmung von Figuren, 1: Über den Einfluss gehäufter Einprägung von Figuren auf ihre Sichtbarkeit in umfassenden Konfigurationen”, Psychol. Forsch., 1926, 8, 261–317 Google Scholar
22. Hanfmann, , Eugenia, and Kasanin, J., “Conceptual thinking in schizophrenia”, Nerv. ment. Dis. Mongr., 1942, No. 67.Google Scholar
23. Hebb, D. O., “The innate organization of visual activity: 1. Perception of figures by rats reared in total darkness”, J. genet. Psychol., 1957, 51, 101–126.Google Scholar
24. Hebb, D. O., “The innate organization of visual activity: 2. Transfer of response in the discrimination of brightness and size by rats reared in total darkness”, J. comp. Psychol., 1957, 24, 277–299.Google Scholar
25. Idem , “Drives and the C.N.S. (Conceptual Nervous System)”, Psychol. Rev., 1955, 62, 243–253.Google Scholar
26. Hull, C. L., Principles of Behaviour, 1943. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts Inc.Google Scholar
27. Jenkin, N., and Morse, S. A., “Developmental and Intellectual Processes in Size-distance Judgment”. Unpub. M.S.Google Scholar
28. Klüver, H., Behaviour Mechanisms in Monkeys, 1933. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
29. Kragh, U., The Actual-genetic Model of Perception-Personality, 1955. Lund, Ejnar Munksgaard, Kopenhagen: C. W. K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
30. Krueger, F., “The essence of feeling”, in The Wittenberg Symposium, Feelings and Emotions, 1928. Worcester, Mass. Google Scholar
31. Külpe, O., “Ueber die moderne Psychologie des Denkens”, Internat. Monatschr. Wiss., Kunst Technik., 1912, 6, 1069–1110.Google Scholar
32. McClelland, D. C., Personality, 1951. New York: Sloane.Google Scholar
33. McGaughran, L. S., and Moran, L. J., “Conceptual level vs. conceptual area analysis of object sorting behaviour of schizophrenic and non-psychiatric groups”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 52, 43–50.Google Scholar
34. Marbe, K., “Experimentell-psychologische Untersuchungen über das Urteil: eine Einleitung in die Logik”, Monograph 1901. As quoted by E. G. Boring, History of Experimental Psychology, 1950. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts Inc.Google Scholar
35. Michotte, A., La perception de la causalité, 1946. Louvain et Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
36. Idem , “A propos de la permanence phénoménale: Faits et théories”, Acta Psychol., 1950, 7, 298–322.Google Scholar
37. Piaget, J., “Experimental epistemoiogy”. Unpublished lecture at Harvard University, 1953. Cited in Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., and Austin, G. A., A Study of Thinking, 1957. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.Google Scholar
38. Idem, The Construction of Reality in the Child, 1954. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
39. Rapaport, D., Diagnostic Psychological Testing, 1946. Chicago: The Year Book Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
40. Raush, H. L., “Perceptual constancy in schizophrenia”, J. Personality, 1941, 46, 131.Google Scholar
41. Riesen, A. H., “The development of visual perception in man and chimpanzee”, Science, 1947, 106, 107–108.Google Scholar
42. Rodnick, E. H., and Shakow, D., “Set in the schizophrenic as measured by a composite reaction time index”, Amer. J. Psychiat., 1940, 97, 214–225.Google Scholar
43. Salzinger, K., “Shift in judgment of weight as a function of anchoring stimuli and instructions in early schizophrenics and normals”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 55, 1.Google Scholar
44. Sander, F., “Structure, totality of experience and gestalt”, in Murchison, C. (ed.), Psychologies of 1930, 1930. Worcester, Mass. Google Scholar
45. Sapir, E., Selected Writing of Edward Sapir. Maudelbaum, D. G. (ed.), 1949. Berkeley, Los Angeles: California University Press.Google Scholar
46. Schachtel, E. G., “On memory and childhood amnesia”, Psychiatry, 1947, 10, 1–26.Google Scholar
47. Schilder, P., “Ueber Gedankenentwicklung”, Z. ges. Neurol. Psychiat., 1920, 59, 250–264.Google Scholar
48. Schlesinger, H. J., “Cognitive attitudes in relation to susceptibility to interference”, Doct. Dissert., Unpub. MS. Google Scholar
49. Seden, M., Raum und Gestaltauffassung bei operierten Blindgeborenen vor und nach Operation, 1932. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
50. Sherman, M. H., “A brief, objective test for the measurement of mental impairment”, J. gen. Psychol., 1955, 52, 275–296.Google Scholar
51. Sullivan, S. H., “The language of schizophrenia”, in Kasanin, J. S. (ed.), Language and Thought in Schizophrenia, 1954. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
52. Thouless, R. M., “Individual differences in phenomenal regression”, Brit. J. Psychol., 1932, 22, 216–241.Google Scholar
53. Thurstone, L. L., Factorial Studies of Perception, 1944. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
54. Von Uexkull, J., “A stroll through the worlds of animals and men”, in Clair Schiller, (ed.), Instinctive Behaviour, 1957. Inst. Univ. Press. Google Scholar
55. Vigotsky, L. “Thought in schizophrenia” (translation), Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1934, 31, 1063–1077.Google Scholar
56. Watt, J., “Experimentelle Beitrage zu einer Theorie des Denkens”, Arch. ges. Psychol., 1905, 4, 289–436.Google Scholar
57. Weckowicz, T. E., “Size Constancy in schizophrenic patients”, J. ment. Sci., 1957, 103, 432.Google Scholar
58. Idem , Sommer, R., and Hall, R., “Distance constancy in schizophrenic patients”, ibid., 1958, 104, 436.Google Scholar
59. Werner, H., Comparative Psychology of Mental Development, 1948. Chicago: Follett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
60. Whiteman, M., “Qualitative features of schizophrenic thought in the formation of social concepts”, J. nerv. ment. Dis., 1956, 124, 2.Google Scholar
61. Whorf, B. L., Language, thought and reality. Selected writings. Carroll, J. B. (ed.), 1956. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.Google Scholar
62. Witkin, H. A., Lewis, H. B., Hertzman, M., Machover, K., Bretnall-Meissner, P., and Wapner, S., Personality Through Perception, 1954. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.