Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T14:20:22.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extreme Response Set, Drive Level and Abnormality in Questionnaire Rigidity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. C. Brengelmann
J. C. Brengelmann*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, London, S.E.5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In several recent experiments involving motor performance (1), learning (7), immediate recall (2), expressive movement (5) and confidence in performance (3), significant relationships with a questionnaire measure of rigidity have been obtained. In view of the fact that despite a considerable amount of work no general trait of rigidity has hitherto been recognized, it was decided to clarify the reasons for the above results. Two steps are undertaken. The first step, published separately, is concerned with a systematic analysis of the experimental variables which yielded significant correlations with rigidity. In a series of investigations, the attempt is made to discover the experimental conditions necessary for a significant interaction of rigidity with test responses to occur.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 106 , Issue 442 , January 1960 , pp. 171 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1960 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Brengelmann, J. C., “Extraversion, neurotische Tenden und Rigidität im Umkehrversuch (Prismenbrille)”, Z. exp. and angew. Psychol., 1957, 4, 339–362.Google Scholar
2. Idem , “The effects of exposure time in immediate recall on abnormal and questionnaire criteria of personality”, J. Ment. Sci., 1958, 104, 665–680.Google Scholar
3. Idem , “Abnormal and personality correlates of certainty”, J. Ment. Sci., 1959a, 105, 142–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Idem , “Differences in questionnaire responses between English and German nationals”, Acta Psychol., 1959b (in press).Google Scholar
5. Idem , “Expressive movements and abnormal behaviour”, in Eysenck, H. J. (ed.) Handbook of Abnormal Psychology, 1960. London: Pitman Medical Publications (to appear).Google Scholar
6. Idem , “A note on questionnaire rigidity and extreme response set”, J. Ment. Sci., 1960, 106, 187.Google Scholar
7. Idem, Hahn, H., Pedley, J. C., and Amato, J. G., “Learning and personality: I. A pilot experiment”, Acta Psychol. (submitted).Google Scholar
8. Duffy, , Elizabeth, , “The concept of energy mobilization”, Psychol. Rev., 1951, 58, 30–40.Google Scholar
9. Eysenck, H. J., “The questionnaire measurement of extraversion and neuroticism”, Riv. Psychol., 1956a, 50, 113–140.Google Scholar
10. Idem , “Reminiscence, drive and personality theory”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956b, 53, 328–333.Google Scholar
11. Idem, The Dynamics of Anxiety and Hysteria, 1957. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
12. Gough, H. G., The Development of a Rigidity Scale, 1952. Berkeley: The University of California, Institute of Personality Assessment and Research (mimeographed).Google Scholar
13. Inous, J., “Abnormalities of motivation and ‘ego-function’,” in Eysenck, H. J. (ed.), Handbook of Abnormal Psychology, 1960. London: Pitman Medical Publications (to appear).Google Scholar
14. Jones, H. G., “Learning and abnormal behaviour”, in Eysenck, H. J. (ed.), Handbook of Abnormal Psychology, 1960. London: Pitman Medical Publications (to appear).Google Scholar
15. Nigniewitzky, R. D., A Statistical Study of Rigidity as a Personality Variable, 1955. M.A. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
16. Idem , A Statistical and Experimental Investigation of Rigidity in Relation to Personality and Social Attitudes, 1956. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
17. Rokeach, M., Dogmatism and Rigidity as Determinants of Cognition, 1953. M.A. Thesis, Michigan State College.Google Scholar
18. Idem , McGovney, W. C., and Denny, M. R., “A distinction between dogmatic and rigid thinking”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 51, 87–93.Google Scholar
19. Idem , and Fruchter, B., “A factorial study of dogmatism and related concepts”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 53, 356–360.Google Scholar
20. Schwartz, L., Die Neurosen und die Dynamische Psychologie von Pierre Janet, 1951. Basle: Benno Schwabe and Company.Google Scholar
21. Soueif, M. I., “Extreme response sets as a measure of intolerance of ambiguity”, Brit. J. Psychol., 1958, 49, 329–334.Google Scholar
22. Taylor, Janet A., “A personality scale of manifest anxiety”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 285–290.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.