Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:49:01.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychological Measures As Used to Predict Psychiatric Improvement and to Assess Behavioural Changes Following Prefrontal Lobotomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Paul McReynolds  and
Marian Weide
Paul McReynolds
Affiliation:
Veterans Administration Hospital, Palo Alto, California
Marian Weide
Affiliation:
Veterans Administration Hospital, Palo Alto, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The advent of the various tranquillizing drugs during the past few years and their increasing use in mental hospitals have had the effect of drastically decreasing the number of lobotomies performed. At our hospital, e.g., the last lobotomy was performed in November, 1954; previous to that time 131 such operations had been done in seven years. To all intents and purposes lobotomy is a therapeutic procedure no longer used for psychiatric purposes. This may change, of course—it may be decided that for certain patients a lobotomy is still the treatment of choice. Or, it may be that in the years to come lobotomy will be of interest chiefly to medical historians.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 106 , Issue 442 , January 1960 , pp. 256 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1960 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Becker, W., and McFarland, R., “A lobotomy prognosis scale”, 1954. Unpublished paper. Palo Alto, California: Veterans Administration Hospital.Google Scholar
2. Cass, W. A., “T-score conversion table for use with Rorschach Test scores”, 1950. Unpublished research. Palo Alto, California: Veterans Administration Hospital.Google Scholar
3. Downey, June E., The Will-temperament and its Testing, 1925. Yonkers-on-Hudson: World Book Company.Google Scholar
4. Ferguson, J., McReynolds, P., and Ballachey, E., The Hospital Adjustment Scale, 1953. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
5. Greenblatt, M., and Solomon, H. (eds.), Frontal Lobes and Schizophrenia, 1953. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
6. Jenkins, R., Holsopple, J., and Lorr, M., “Effects of prefrontal lobotomy on patients with severe chronic schizophrenia”, Am, J. Psychiat., 1954, III, 84–90.Google Scholar
7. Jones, K. P., “A study of leucotomy data”, 1956. Unpublished study. Palo Alto, California: Veterans Administration Hospital.Google Scholar
8. Jones, R., “Personality changes in psychotics following prefrontal lobotomy”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1949, 44, 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. McReynolds, P., and Ferguson, J., Clinical Manual for the Hospital Adjustment Scale, 1953. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
10. Idem , “The Rorschach Concept Evaluation Technique”, J. proj. techniques., 1954, 18, 60–74.Google Scholar
11. Idem , “A restricted conceptualization of human anxiety and motivation”, Monograph Supplement to Psychol. Reports, 1956, 6, 293–312.Google Scholar
12. Mettler, F. (ed.), Selective Partial Ablation of the Frontal Cortex by Columbia-GreystoneGoogle Scholar
Associates, 1949. New York: Paul B. Hoeber, Inc.Google Scholar
13. Pascal, G. R., and Suttell, B. J., The Bender-Gestalt Test, Quantification and Validity for Adults, 1951. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
14. Peters, H., “Traits related to improved adjustment of psychotics after lobotomy”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1947, 42, 383–393.Google Scholar
15. Porteus, S. D., The Porteus Maze Test and Intelligence, 1950. Palo Alto: Pacific Books.Google Scholar
16. Robinson, , Mary, Frances, “What price lobotomy?” J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1946, 41, 421–437.Google Scholar
17. Scherer, I., Winne, J., Clancy, D., and Baker, R., “Psychological changes during the first year following prefrontal lobotomy”, Psychol. Monogr., 1953, 67, Whole No. 357.Google Scholar
18. Iidem , and Baker, R., “Psychological changes over a three-year period following bilateral prefrontal lobotomy”, J. const. Psychol., 1955, 19, 291–298.Google Scholar
19. Schrader, P., and Robinson, , Mary, Frances, “An evaluation of prefrontal lobotomy through ward behaviour”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1945, 40, 61–70.Google Scholar
20. Wechsler, D., The Measurement of Adult Intelligence, 1938. Baltimore: William and Wilkins.Google Scholar
21. Wells, F. L., and Reusch, J., Mental Examiners' Handbook, 1945, Psychological Corp.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.