Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T23:40:03.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Five-Year Follow-Up of Results of Reserpine Therapy in Mental Hospital Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Ronald Maggs
Affiliation:
Hellingly Hospital, Hailsham, Sussex
R. M. Ellison
Affiliation:
Kingsgate Hospital, Perth, W. Australia

Extract

Reserpine was first used extensively in mental hospital practice in this country in 1954. Conflicting reports as to its usefulness in psychiatry have appeared and, before a standardized assessment of the drug could be made, investigators examined the combined use of reserpine and chlorpromazine (Barsa and Kline, 3). Hare et al. (10) have pointed out that there is a sequence of events in the investigation of a new drug that is associated with a fluctuating enthusiasm as to its usefulness, and it is our belief that a commentary now on the present use of reserpine would not be out of place. Kline (13) was one of the first to describe the use of reserpine in American psychiatric practice, and his report was shortly followed in this country by those of Foote (8) and Glynn (9). These early studies were essentially preliminary investigations and concerned the use of reserpine in groups of patients, sometimes small, or of one sex. Other more extensive North American investigations by Noce et al. (17) and Azima et al. (2) showed that the beneficial effect of the drug was not as widespread as originally thought, even with adequate dosage, in schizophrenia. Barsa and Kline (4) produced further conflicting evidence that the drug was of value in all kinds of mental illness, although in a later paper in 1956 (3) they outlined the comparative uses of reserpine when contrasted with chlorpromazine.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1960 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ayd, F. J., New York St. J. Medicine, 1958, 354356.Google Scholar
2. Azima, H., Kent, I., and Cleghorn, R. A., Canad. med. Ass. J., 1955, 73, 866871.Google Scholar
3. Barsa, J. A., and Kline, N. S., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1956, 76, 9097.Google Scholar
4. Iidem, ibid., 1955, 74, 3, 280286.Google Scholar
5. Davies, D. L., and Shepherd, M., Lancet, 1955, ii, 117120.Google Scholar
6. Ferguson, R. S., J. Ment. Sci., 1959, 105, 438, 251255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Folkson, A., and May, A. R., Brit. med. J., 1955, ii, 1121.Google Scholar
8. Foote, E. S., ibid., 1955, i, 1192.Google Scholar
9. Glynn, J. D., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 1955, 18, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Hare, E. H., Seager, C. P., and Leitch, A. L., Lancet, 1956, i, 545.Google Scholar
11. Hollister, R., et al., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1955, 61, 1, 92.Google Scholar
12. Hoch, P. H., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1956, 75, 325328.Google Scholar
13. Kline, N. S., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1954, 59, 107.Google Scholar
14. Leibermann, D. M., and Vaughan, G. F., J. Ment. Sci., 1957, 103, 110117.Google Scholar
15. Mayer-Gross, W., Slater, E., and Roth, M., Clinic. Psychiat., London, 1954.Google Scholar
16. Moore, J. P. N., Brit. med. J., 1956, i, 513.Google Scholar
17. Noce, R. H., Williams, D. B., and Rapaport, W., J.A.M.A., 1955, 158, 11.Google Scholar
18. Penman, A. S., and Dredge, T. E., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1956, 76, 1, 4249.Google Scholar
19. Shepherd, M., and Watt, D. C., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 1956, 19, 232235.Google Scholar
20. Sommerness, M. D., Lucero, R. J., Hamlon, J. S., Erickson, J. L., and Matthews, R., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1955, 74, 3, 316319.Google Scholar
21. Stuppy, L. K., and Tober, J. N., Angiology, 1955, 6, 253.Google Scholar
22. Swenson, W. M., Gislason, S., and Anerson, D. F., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1956, 76, 1, 6064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Wing, L., J. Ment. Sci., 1956, 102, 428, 530541.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.