Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T16:39:05.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Galvanic Skin Response Studies of Sex Responsiveness in Sex Offenders and Others

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. E. Tong*
Affiliation:
Rampton Hospital, Retford, Notts

Extract

The assessment of sex responsiveness is a recurring problem in the field of conduct disorders and psychopathy, particularly when it is desirable to determine the effectiveness of therapy on the behaviour of the sex offender. Previous studies have indicated certain test differences in emotional disturbance and stress reactivity in subjects of known delinquent history, but it has been observed that sex responsiveness may be an additional (separate) factor to consider for the patient who is a known sex offender (19, 20, 21, 22).

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1960 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bassett, M., and Ross Ashby, W., J. Ment. Sci., 1954, 100, 632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Bindra, D., and Cameron, L., J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Boyd, P. S., and Valentine, M., Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1953, 26, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Brady, M., J. Ment. Sci., 1948, 94, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Elliott, D. N., and Singer, E. G., J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Eysenck, H. J., Dimensions of Personality, 1947. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
7 Idem , The Scientific Study of Personality, 1952. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
8 Garst, J. B., and Stobin, E. K., A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1955, 74, 125.Google Scholar
9 Gordon, S., O'Connor, N., and Tizard, J., Brit. J. Psychol., 1954, 45, 277.Google Scholar
10 Haggard, E. A., J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Haward, L. R. C., Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1955, 28, 183.Google Scholar
12 Keehn, H., J. Ment. Sci., 1953, 99, 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Kendall, M. G., Rank Correlation Methods, 1948. London: Charles Griffin.Google Scholar
14 Klopfer, D., and Kelley, D. M., The Rorschach Technique, 1946. New York: World Book Co. Google Scholar
15 Lacey, O. L., and Siegel, P. S., J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Mundy Castle, A. C., and McKiever, B. I., ibid., 1953, 46, 15.Google Scholar
17 Paintal, A. S., ibid., 1951, 41, 425.Google Scholar
18 Psychological Research Wing, Ind. J. Psychol., 1953, 28, 21.Google Scholar
19 Tong, J. E., Brit. J. Delinq., 1955, 5, 304.Google Scholar
20 Idem , Brit. J. Psychol., 1957, 48, 1, 13.Google Scholar
21 Idem , J. Ment. Sci., 1959, 105.Google Scholar
22 Idem and Mackay, G. W., Brit. J. Delinq., 1959, 9, 4, 276.Google Scholar
23 Idem and Murphy, I. C., “Rorschach Indices and Autonomic Stress Reactivity”, J. Clin. Psychol., 1960, 16, 3, 324.Google Scholar
24 Venables, P. H., Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 7, 12.Google Scholar
25 Woodworth, R. S., and Schlosberg, H., Experimental Psychology, 1954. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.