Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T16:44:26.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morbid Jealousy: Some Clinical and Social Aspects of a Psychiatric Symptom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Extract

Jealousy is more than a psychiatric symptom. Its language is universal: the conduct and feelings of the jealous man and woman have repeatedly drawn the attention of the great observers of human nature, the moralists and the philosophers as well as the poets and the novelists. They have, on the whole, described the reaction more successfully than they have defined it. Even the most celebrated definitions—Descartes' “kind of fear related to a desire to preserve a possession” or Spinoza's “mixture of hate and love”, for example— merely illustrate the complexity of a term whose many nuances of meaning can be detected in its roots. The English adjective “jealous” and the noun “jealousy” are derived respectively from the French “jaloux” and “jalousie”, both taken from the old Provençal “gilos”; “gilos” in turn may be traced back to the vulgar Latin adjective “zelosus” which comes from the late Latin “zelus” and so indirectly from the Greek ζηλoς. In its transmission the word has thus been debased. It has ceased to denote “zeal” or “ardour”; the “noble passion” which stood opposed to “envy” for the Greeks has acquired a pejorative quality. In modern German the distinction is preserved verbally, “Eifersucht” having been formed from the original “Eifer” (zeal) and the suffix “-sucht”, which is cognate with “siech”, meaning “sickly”. Amorous jealousy claims associations of its own. During the seventeenth century the French word “jalousie” acquired the meaning of “blind” or “shutter”; in this sense it entered the English language as a noun in the early nineteenth century; the transmutation is thought to have signified a jocular reference to the suspicious husband or lover who could watch unobserved behind the jalousie; the Italian word “gelosia” is used in this way as early as the middle of the sixteenth century. In the Scandinavian languages separate words designate amorous jealousy. (1) The Swedish “svartsjuk”, literally “black sick”, is taken from an old expression which identified jealousy with the wearing of black socks; the Danish “skinsyg”, “afraid of getting skin (a rebuff)”, harks back to an old link of jealousy with skin which may in turn have been connected with hose or socks. (2) The origin of the colours which are traditionally employed to depict jealousy, especially black, yellow and green, is obscure.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1961 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hellquist, E., Svensk Etymologisk Ordbok, 1920. Gleerup: Lund.Google Scholar
2 Stenberg, S., “Beitrag zur Kasuistik des Eifersuchtswahnes', Acta Scand. Neurol. et Psychiat., 1943, 18, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 McDougall, W., The Energies of Men, 1948. London: Methuen ' Co. Google Scholar
4 Jones, E., “La jalousie”, Rev. française de Psychanalyse, 1929, 3, 228.Google Scholar
5 Ribot, T., Essai sur les Passions, 1910. Paris: Alcan. p. 90.Google Scholar
6 Shand, A. F., “M. Ribot's Theory of the Passions”, Mind, 1907, 16, 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Gesell, A., “Jealousy”, Amer. J. Psychol., Worcester, 1906, 17, 437.Google Scholar
8 Freud, S., “Certain neurotic mechanisms in jealousy, paranoia and homosexuality”, Collected Papers, 1924. Vol. II., p. 232. The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
9 Ruckmick, C. A., “The Classification of Emotions”, in: The Psychology of Feeling and Emotion (Ed. by Dashiel, J. F.), 1936. McGraw Hill, p. 111.Google Scholar
10 Whitehorn, J. C., “Physiological Changes in Emotional States”, Research, Publ. A. Nerv. and Ment. Dis., 1939, 19, 256.Google Scholar
11 Lagache, D., La Jalousie Amoureuse, 1947. 3 vols. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
12 Buchanan Scott, The Doctrine of Signatures, 1938. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
13 Mairet, A., La Jalousie: Étude Psycho-physiologique, Clinique et Médico-légale, 1908, Montpellier.Google Scholar
14 Ey, H., “Jalousie morbide”, in: Études Psychiatriques, 1950. Tome II. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer et Cie, p. 483.Google Scholar
15 Escombe, J., La Jalousie Morbide des Alcooliques, 1899. Paris.Google Scholar
16 Krafft-Ebbing, —., “Uber Eifersuchtswahn beim Manne”, Jahrb. f. Psychiatrie, 1891, 10, 221.Google Scholar
17 Lewis, A. J., “Alcoholic Psychoses”, Brit. Encycl. of Med. Practice, 1938, 8, 332.Google Scholar
18 Pohlisch, K., “Die Persönlichekeit und das Milieu Delirium-tremens-Kranker der Charité aus den Jahren 1912 bis 1925”, Monatsschr. f. Psychiatrie u. Neurol., 1927, 63, 82.Google Scholar
19 Kolle, K., “Uber Eifersucht und Eifersuchtswahn bei Trinkern”, ibid., 1932, 83, 128.Google Scholar
20 Kraepelin, E., Psychiatrie, 7th edition. Vol. II. Leipzig, p. 158.Google Scholar
21 Parant, V., quoted by Semelaigne, R., “Delusions resulting from jealousy”, J. Ment. Sci., 1902, 48, 131.Google Scholar
22 Gruhle, H. W., “Partielle Geschäftsunfähigkeit, partielle Zurechnungsfähigkeit (Eifersucht)”, Nervenarzt, 1940, 13, 544.Google Scholar
23 Redlich, E., “Die Psychosen bei Gehirnerkrankungen” in: Handbuch der Psychiatrie (ed. by Aschaffenburg, ), 1912. Leipzig.Google Scholar
24 Abély, P., and Feuillet, C., “Les idées délirantes de jalousie dans la démence précoce”, Ann. Med. Psychol., 1941, 99(2), 75.Google Scholar
25 Jaspers, K., “Eifersuchtswahn”, Z. Neur., 1910, 1, 567.Google Scholar
26 Lagache, D., Discussion in L'Evolution Psychiatrique, 1955, p. 64.Google Scholar
27 Campbell, J. D., Manic-Depressive Disease, 1952. Lippincott.Google Scholar
28 Alapin, B., “Zazdrose Zwykla, Charakteropatyczna I Urojeniawa (Etiologia, patogeneza, klinika), Neurologia, Neurochirurgia i Psychiatria Polska, 1958, 8, 441.Google Scholar
29 Lange, J., “Die endogenen und reaktiven Gemütserkrankungen und die manisch-depressive Konstitution”, in: Handbuch der Geisteskrankheiten (Special), (ed. by Bumke, O.), 1928, Vol. II, p. 91. Springer.Google Scholar
30 Brousseau, A., “Variétés de la personnalité des jaloux au regard de la clinique”, L'Evolution Psychiatrique, 1955, p. 33.Google Scholar
31 Kehrer, F., “Paranoische Zustände”, in: Handbuch der Geisteskrankheiten (Special), (ed. by Bumke, O.), 1928, Vol. II, pp. 245 and 260.Google Scholar
32 Stefanowski, D., “Morbid Jealousy”, Alienist and Neurologist, St. Louis, 1893, 14, 375.Google Scholar
33 Bleuler, E., Dementia Praecox, 1911 (translated 1950). New York: International Universities Press. p. 399.Google Scholar
34 Langfeldt, G., “The Hypersensitive Mind”, Acta Psychiatrica et Neurologica Scandinavica, 1951, Supplementum 73, p. 53.Google Scholar
35 Borel, J., Les Psychoses Passionnelles, 1952. Expansion Scientifique Française.Google Scholar
36 Kretschmer, E., A Textbook of Medical Psychology, 1952. The Hogarth Press. p. 268.Google Scholar
37 Fenichel, O., The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis, 1945. New York: W. W. Norton, p. 512.Google Scholar
38 Klein, M., Envy and Gratitude, 1957. Tavistock Publications Ltd., p. 32.Google Scholar
39 Seidenberg, R., “Jealousy: The Wish”, Psychoanalytic Review, 1952, 39, 345.Google Scholar
40 Schmiedeberg, M., “Some aspects of jealousy and of feeling hurt”, ibid., 1953, 1, p. 1.Google Scholar
41 Tiggelaar, J., “Pathological jealousy and jealous delusions”, Fol. Psychiat. Neerl., 1956, 59, 522.Google Scholar
42 du Boeuff, C. W., Over Jaloerschheidswan, 1938. Zutphen: Ruys.Google Scholar
43 Minkowski, E., “Jalousie pathologique sur un fond d'automatisme mental”, Ann. Méd.-Psychol., 1929, 87, Pt. 2, 24.Google Scholar
44 Lund, F. H., Emotions, 1947. New York: The Ronald Press Company, p. 228.Google Scholar
45 Rumke, H., in: Transcript of Comments and Discussion of the Work Conference on Problems in Field Studies in the Mental Disorders, 1959 (unpublished). American Psychopathological Association. p. 370.Google Scholar
46 Ellis, H., “Studies in the Psychology of Sex”. Vol. VI. Sex in Relation to Society, 1928. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis. p. 569.Google Scholar
47 Davis, K., “Jealousy and Sexual Property”, Social Forces, 1936, 14, 395.Google Scholar
48 Westermarck, E., A Short History of Human Marriage, 1908. Macmillan.Google Scholar
49 Blacker, C. P., “Disruption of Marriage”, Lancet, 1958, i, 578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50 Lovel Barnes, J. F., “Marriage, Paranoia and Paranoid States”, Med. Press, 1954, 232.Google Scholar
51 Revitch, E., “The Problem of Conjugal Paranoia”, Dis. Nerv. System, 1954, 15, 271.Google Scholar
52 Slater, E. T. O., and Woodside, M., Patterns of Marriage, 1951. London: Cassell, p. 156.Google Scholar
53 Macdonell, J., in: Report of the Royal Commission on Capital Punishment (1949–1953), 1953. H.M.S.O., p. 330.Google Scholar
54 East, W. N., Medical Aspects of Crime, 1936. London: J. ' A. Churchill. p. 364.Google Scholar
55 Brierley, H. C., Homicide in the United States, 1932. Chapel Hill. Google Scholar
56 Gray, J. P., “Responsibility of the Insane: Homicide in Insanity”, Amer. J. Insanity, 1875, 32, 1 and 153.Google Scholar
57 Sullivan, W. C., “The Relation of Alcoholism to Insanity and Crime”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1924, 17, 37.Google Scholar
58 Hopwood, J. S., and Milner, K., “Alcoholism and Criminal Insanity”, Brit. J. Ineb., 1940, 38, 51.Google Scholar
59 Mowat, R. R., “Incidence of Morbid Jealousy in Murderers”, Dissertation for the University of London Diploma of Psychological Medicine, 1956 (unpublished).Google Scholar
60 East, W. N., Forensic Psychiatry, 1927. London: J. A. Churchill. p. 198.Google Scholar
61 Myer, A. F., Apfelberger, B., and Sugar, C., “Men who kill Women”, J. Clin. Psychopathol., 1947, 8, (No. 3), 481.Google Scholar
62 Karpman, B., Case Studies in the Psychopathology of Crime, 1948. Vol. III. Washington, D.C.: Med. Sci. Press.Google Scholar
63 J. Ment. Sci., 1864, 9, 591; 1865, 10, 21; 1865, 11, 66.Google Scholar
64 Tuke, D. H., “Monomania”, in: Dictionary of Psychological Medicine, 1892. London: J. ' A. Churchill. p. 82.Google Scholar
65 Maudsley, H., Responsibility in Mental Disease, 1897. New York: Appleton ' Co. p. 213.Google Scholar
66 Claude, H., Psychiatrie Médico-Légale, 1932. Paris: G. Doin et Cie. p. 135.Google Scholar
67 Edwards, J. W. J., “Provocation and the Reasonable Man: another View”, Criminal Law Review, 1954. London: Sweet ' Maxwell Ltd. p. 898.Google Scholar
68 Devlin, P., “Criminal Responsibility and Punishment: Functions of Judge and Jury”, ibid., 1954. London: Sweet ' Maxwell. p. 661.Google Scholar
69 Gooderson, R. N., “The Charge was Murder”, The Listener, 1959, 61, 549.Google Scholar
70 de Greeff, E., Introduction a la Criminologie, 1946. Vol. I. Brussels: Joseph Vandenplas. p. 366.Google Scholar
71 Report of the Royal Commission on Marriage and Divorce, 1956. London: H.M.S.O. p. 39.Google Scholar
72 The Law Reports (Probate), Palmer v. Palmer, 1955, p. 4.Google Scholar
73 O'Neill, W., “A Case of Jealousy”, Lancet, 1898, i, 223.Google Scholar
74 Brunswick, R., “A Case of Paranoia (Delusions of Jealousy)”, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1929, 70, 1 and 155.Google Scholar
75 Wendt, C. F., “Die ‘Eifersuchtsparanoia’ im psychotherapeutischen Aspekt”, Arch. Psychiat. Nervenkr., 1951, 186, 496.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.