Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:35:52.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of thioproperazine administered by a continuous method on long-term schizophrenic patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. W. Affleck
Affiliation:
The Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Morningside, Edinburgh, 10
J. C. D. Booth
Affiliation:
The Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Morningside, Edinburgh, 10
A. D. Forrest
Affiliation:
The Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Morningside, Edinburgh, 10
K. J. Mackay
Affiliation:
The Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Morningside, Edinburgh, 10

Extract

Thioproperazine is a phenothiazine compound with a piperazine nucleus in the side chain. The pharmacological investigations of Courvoisier et al. (1958) indicate that it is much less sedative than other phenothiazines and that it has weak anti-adrenaline, anti-histamine and anti-serotonin activity. Clinical reports by Delay et al. (1958), Perrin et al. (1958), Denber et al. (1959), Levy and Maarek (1960) and Perret et al. (1961) indicate improvement in schizophrenic patients, but their papers described trials of this drug in which both recent and long-term cases or other diagnostic groups were included. Denham and Carrick (1961) reported the total remission of symptoms in 32 of 58 chronic schizophrenics treated by the discontinuous method with significant improvement in a further 25. Their acceptance of the view that improvement was correlated with the occurrence of hypertonic syndromes and that failure of treatment was likely if anti-parkinsonism drugs were used to suppress the hypertonicity, excludes the possibility of the type of continuous treatment employed with other phenothiazines. Denber et al., however, advocated the suppression of these drug effects and Perret et al. reported 47% improvement using the continuous method in another mixed group of chronic patients.

Type
Clinical Trials
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1962 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Courvoisier, S., Ducrot, R., Fournel, J. and Julou, L. (1958). Report to Congr. Psychiat. Neurol., Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Cramond, W. (1962). Lancet, i, 592.Google Scholar
Delay, J., Deniker, P., Ropert, R., Barander, R. and Eurieult, M. (1958). Report to Congr. Psychiat. Neurol., Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Denber, H. C. B., Rajotte, P. and Kauffman, D. (1959). Amer. J. Psychiat., 115, 1116.Google Scholar
Denham, J. and Carrick, D. J. E. L. (1961). J. Ment. Sci., 107, 326.Google Scholar
Levy, L. and Maarek, T. (1960). Tunisie Médicale, 7, 513.Google Scholar
Ollendorff, R. H. V. (1962). Brit. Med. J., i, 1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perret, A., Bastie, Y. and Ormieres, J. (1961). Semaine des Hôpitaux, 37, 638.Google Scholar
Perrin, J., Lambert, P. A., Broussolle, P., Balvet, P., Beauford, M., Revol, L., Achaintre, A., Bertnier, C., and Requet, A. (1958). Report to Congr. Psychiat. Neurol. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Subra, G. and Auge, J. (1960). Encéphale, 49, 233.Google Scholar
Vallade, L., Hauser, F., Bouckson, G. and Corsetti, R. (1961). Presse Medicate, 69, 562.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.