Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T11:12:13.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behaviour Therapy, Extinction and Relapse in Neurosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

H. J. Eysenck
H. J. Eysenck*
Affiliation:
University of London Institute of Psychiatry, London, S.E.5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Behaviour therapy is defined as the application of the principles of modern learning theory to the treatment of neurotic disorders (Eysenck, 1960a, 1963). It defines neurotic “symptoms” as unadaptive conditioned autonomic responses, or the skeletal and muscular activities instrumental in moderating these conditioned autonomic responses. Treatment consists essentially in the extinction of autonomic, skeletal and muscular responses of this type. This extinction may be produced in a great variety of ways, but experience has shown that the most useful and important is probably the method of counterconditioning or “reciprocal inhibition” (Wolpe, 1958). This method takes two forms, according to the nature of the symptom. (1) When the symptom is of a dysthymic character (anxieties, phobias, depression, obsessive-compulsive reactions, etc.) it is assumed that the disorder consists of conditioned sympathetic reactions, and the treatment consists of reconditioning the stimulus (or stimuli) to produce parasympathetic reactions which, being antagonistic to the sympathetic ones, will weaken and finally extinguish them. These disorders we will here call “disorders of the first kind”. (2) When the symptom is of a socially disapproved type in which the conditioned stimulus evokes parasympathetic responses (alcoholism, fetishism, homosexuality), or where there is an entire absence of an appropriate conditioned response (enuresis, psychopathic behaviour), treatment (aversion therapy) consists of the pairing of the stimulus in question with strong aversive stimuli producing sympathetic reactions. These disorders we will call “disorders of the second kind”. (In putting the distinction between these two types of treatment in this very abbreviated form, we have used the terms “sympathetic” and “parasympathetic” in a rather inexact shorthand notation to refer to hedonically positive and negative experiences respectively; the reader familiar with the complexities of autonomic reactions will no doubt be able to translate these blanket statements into more precise language appropriate to each individual case. We have retained this use of the terms here because it aids in the general description given, and indicates the physiological basis assumed to exist for the hedonic reactions.)

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 109 , Issue 458 , January 1963 , pp. 12 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1963 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Denker, R. (1946). “Results of treatment of psychoneuroses by general practitioners”, New York State J. Med., 46, 2164–2166.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1960a). Behaviour Therapy and Neuroses. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1960b). Handbook of Abnormal Psychology. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1962). “Behaviour therapy, spontaneous remissions and transference in neurotics”, Amer. J. Psychiat., to appear.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1963). Experiments in Behaviour Therapy. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Freund, K. (1960). “Some problems in the treatment of homosexuality”. In: Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), Behaviour Therapy and the Neuroses. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 312–326.Google Scholar
Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of Behaviour. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Gwynne Jones, H. (1960). “The behavioural treatment of enuresis nocturna”. In: Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), Behaviour Therapy and the Neuroses. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 377–403.Google Scholar
Kimble, A. A. (1961). In: Hilgard and Marquis' Conditioning and Learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Lovibond, S. H. (1961). “The theory and method of conditioning in relation to enuresis and its treatment”. Adelaide: Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Mowrer, O. H. (1950). Learning Theory and Personality Dynamics. New York: Ronald.Google Scholar
Oswald, I. (1962). “Induction of illusory and hallucinatory voices with consideration of behaviour therapy”, J. ment. Sci., 108, 196–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spearman, C. (1927). Abilities of Man. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wolpe, J. (1958). Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolpe, J. (1961). “The prognosis in unpsychoanalysed recovery from neurosis”, Amer. J. Psychiat., 117, 35–39.Google Scholar
Yates, A. (1958). “Symptoms and symptom substitution”, Psychol. Rev., 65, 371–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.