Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:47:15.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modified Frontal Leucotomy: A Review of 106 Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

J. L. T. Birley
J. L. T. Birley*
Affiliation:
Maudsley Hospital, London, S.E.5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Frontal leucotomy has been used in the treatment of psychiatric illness for over twenty years. Its popularity has undergone the usual fluctuations of a newly-introduced form of empirical therapy, and at present there are many different opinions about its value (Lancet, 1962; Pippard, 1962). For a critical review of the clinical and psychological literature, see Willett (1960). The standard operation has fallen out of favour, not because it was thought to be ineffective, but because it had undesirable side-effects on the personality. Various “modified” operations have, therefore, been introduced. Using one of these—the “orbital undercutting” technique—Knight (1960) has reported excellent results in 129 cases of long-standing depression. Robin (1958, 1959), however, has reported no difference between the outcome for 198 patients who had a standard leucotomy for functional psychoses, fifty-two of them affective, and an equal number of carefully but retrospectively matched controls.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 110 , Issue 465 , March 1964 , pp. 211 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1964 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Elithorn, A., and Beck, E. (1955). “Prefrontal leucotomy—a clinico-pathological report”. Lancet, i, 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elithorn, A., Glithero, E., and Slater, E. (1958). “Leucotomy for pain.” J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 21, 249–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, A., and Lubin, A. (1952). “The prognosis of the functional psychoses.” Monatsch. Psychiat. Neurol., 124, 126–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, I. M. (1961). “Obsessional illness in mental hospital patients.” J. Merit. Sci., 107, 382–402.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. L., and Jaco, E. G. (1954). “Some prognostic factors in 538 transorbital lobotomy cases.” Amer. J. Psychiat., 111, 353–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Harvey (1954). “Leucotomy—a recent development.” J. Merit. Sci., 100, 62–65.Google Scholar
Knight, G. (1958). In: Discussion on Psychosurgery. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 52, 209–210.Google Scholar
Knight, G. (1960). “330 cases of restricted orbital undercutting.” Ibid., 53, 728–32.Google Scholar
Kramer, M., Goldstein, H., Israel, R. H., and Johnson, N. A. (1956). “Application of life table methodology to the study of mental hospital populations.” Psychiat. Res. Rep., Washington, 5, 77–87.Google Scholar
Lancet (1962). “Leucotomy today”, ii, 1037–38.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. J. (1936). “Problems of obsessional illness.” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 29, 325–36.Google Scholar
Lewin, W. (1960). “Selective leucotomy.” Ibid., 53, 732–34.Google Scholar
Lundquist, G. (1945). “Prognosis and course in manic-depressive psychoses. A follow-up study of 319 first admissions.” Acta Psychiat. Neurol. Scand. Supp. 35.Google Scholar
McKissock, W. (1951). “Rostral leucotomy.” Lancet, ii, 91–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKissock, W. (1958). In: Discussion on Psychosurgery. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 52, 206–9.Google Scholar
Muller, C. (1953). “Vorläufige Mitteilung zur langen Katamnese der Zwangskranken.” Nervenarzt., 24, 112–15.Google Scholar
Norris, V. (1959). Mental Illness in London. London: Maudsley Monograph No. 6.Google Scholar
Pippard, J. (1955). “Rostral leucotomy: a report on 240 cases personally followed up after 1-f12 to 5 years.” J. Ment. Sci., 101, 756–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippard, J. (1962). “Leucotomy in Britain today.” Ibid., 108, 249–55.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. D. (1957). “Natural history of obsessional states. A study of 150 cases.” Brit. Med. J., i, 194–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, J. D. (1959). “Obsessional states: a contribution to natural history.” M.D. Thesis. University of London.Google Scholar
Robin, A. A. (1958). “A controlled study of the effects of leucotomy.” J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 21, 262–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robin, A. A. (1959). “The value of leucotomy in relation to diagnosis.” Ibid., 22, 132–6.Google Scholar
Sargant, W. (1951). “Leucotomy in psychosomatic disorders.” Lancet, ii, 87–91.Google Scholar
Sargant, W. and Slater, E. (1963). An Introduction to Physical Methods of Treatment in Psychiatry. 4th Edition. Edinburgh and London: E. & S. Livingstone Ltd.Google Scholar
Scoville, W. B. (1960). “Late results of orbital undercutting.” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 53, 721–8.Google Scholar
Skottowe, I. (1960). “Orbital undercutting and cingulectomy—a psychiatric appraisal.” Ibid., 53, 734–7.Google Scholar
Stengel, E. (1950). “A follow-up investigation of 330 cases treated by pre-frontal leucotomy.” J. Ment. Sci., 96, 633–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooth, G. G., and Newton, M. P. (1961). “Leucotomy in England and Wales. 1942–54.” Ministry of Health. Rep. Publ. Hlth Med. Subj., No. 104. London.Google Scholar
Willett, R. (1960). “The effects of psychosurgical procedures on behaviour.” In: Handbook of Abnormal Psychology. (Ed.: Eysenck, H. J.) London.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.