Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T18:31:28.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Neurology of Psychotic Speech

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Macdonald Critchley*
Affiliation:
National Hospital, Queen Square, London, W.C.1

Extract

Speech has been called a socio-economic device for saving effort in the attainment of objectives (Whitehorn and Zipf, 1943). One of its earliest and most fundamental purposes is to orientate the individual within the community. This socializing effect operates early in childhood, and in a phylogenetic sense it was perhaps one of the greatest factors in the origin of speech in primitive man. As maturity is slowly achieved in the individual as in the genus, the use of language becomes inextricably interwoven within the warp and woof of the organism, as exemplified not only by thinking processes, but also by the complicated structure of personality. The development of speech during the pre-hominoid stage synchronizes with the gradual elaboration of communal life: with cries and calls serving as a “sound-tool”: and with the beginnings of delegation of labour. Thus language is primarily a vocal actualization of the tendency to see reality symbolically (Sapir). The same is true ontogenetically. As the child gradually acquires speech, the organization of his thinking slowly changes; it evolves by intricate steps from ego-centric to socialized activity; and as he begins more and more to employ pronouns of the second and third person, he also utters fewer “action words”. We readily agree with Fillmore Sanford (1942) that “there are many indications that language is a vehicle of personality as well as of thought, for when a person speaks, he tells us not only about the world, but also, through both form and content, about himself”. The same author quoted Ben Jonson: “Language most showeth a man; speak that I may see thee.”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1964 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atvaz, D. (1963). “The poetry of Dylan Thomas”, in: Dylan Thomas (ed.: Jones, T. H.). Edinburgh and London: Oliver & Boyd, pp. 186210.Google Scholar
Allison, R. S. (1962). The Senile Brain, London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Angyal, L. (1933). “Uber den subkortikalen Anteil der schizophrenen Sprachstörungen.” Mtschr. Psychiat. Neur., 86, 137165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angyal, L. (1950). “Aphasia and Categeric Behaviour”, ibid., 119, 4554.Google Scholar
Diamond, A. S. (1959). The History and Origin of Language. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Fleisghacker, , —. (1930). Mntschr. Psych. Neur., 77, 1.Google Scholar
Kleist, K. (1914). “Aphasie und Geistesktankheit”, Münch, med. Wschr., 61, 8.Google Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1919). Dementia Praecox and Paraphrenia (trans: Barclay, ). Edinburgh: Livingstone.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1958). “Brain disorders and language analysis”, Lang, and Speech, 1, 1434.Google Scholar
Pichot, P. (1955). “Language disturbances in cerebral disease”, Arch. Neur. Psych., 74, 9296.Google Scholar
Piro, S. (1958). “Contributo allo studio della dissociazione semantica nel linguaggio schizophrenico”, Acta Neur., 13, 392413.Google Scholar
Rümke, H. C., and Nijam, S. J. (1958). “Aphasia and delusion.” Folia psych, neur. neurochir. Neerl., 61, 623629.Google Scholar
Sanford, Fillmore H. (1942). “Speech and personality”, Psychol. Bull., 39, 811845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, A. (1927). Zbl. Neur., 108, 491.Google Scholar
Shakow, D., Dolkart, M. B., and Goldman, R. (1941). “The memory function in psychoses”, Dis. Nerv. Syst., 2, 4348.Google Scholar
Stengel, E. (1947). “A clinical and psychological study of echo-reactions”, J. Merit. Sci., 93, 598612.Google Scholar
Teulié, G. (1931). Ann. méd.-psych., 1, 113.Google Scholar
Tindall, Wm. York (1962). A Reader's Guide to Dylan Thomas. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Treece, H. (1949). Dylan Thomas. “Dog among the Fairies”. London: Lindsay Drummond.Google Scholar
Whitehorn, J. C., and Zipf, G. K. (1943). “Schizophrenic language”, Arch. neur. psych., 49, 831851.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.