Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T08:16:19.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Chlorpromazine and Chlordiazepoxide on Cognitive Functioning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

A. Brimer
Affiliation:
Department of Education, University of Bristol
H. Schnieden
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
A. Simon
Affiliation:
West of England College of Arts, Bristol 8

Extract

Whilst it is well known that drugs can cause behavioural changes (Trouton and Eysenck, 1960) relatively little attention has been given to the effects of drugs on complex cognitive functions. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of two drugs frequently used in psychiatric treatment (chlorpromazine and chlordiazepoxide) on performance in problem solving situations as well as in tests involving speed and accuracy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1964 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloom, B. S., and Broder, L. J. (1950). “Problem solving processes of college students.” Supplementary Educational Monogr. No. 73. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Buswell, G. T. (1956). Patterns of Thanking in Problem Solving. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Duncker, K. (1945). “On problem solving.” Psychol. Monogr. No. 270, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1942). The Design of Experiments. London.Google Scholar
Kornetsky, C., Humphries, O., and Evarts, E. V. (1957). “Comparison of psychological effects of certain centrally acting drugs in man.” Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 77, 318323.Google Scholar
Kornetsky, C., Humphries, O. (1958). “Psychological effects of centrally acting drugs in man.” J. Ment. Sci., 104, 10931099.Google Scholar
Lehmann, H. E., and Hanrahan, G. E. (1954). “Chlorpromazine.” Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 71, 227237.Google Scholar
Lindquist, E. F. (1953) Design and Analysis of Experiments in Psychology and Education. Boston.Google Scholar
Miller, J. G. (1962). “Objective measurements of the effects of drugs on driver behaviour.” J. Amer. Med. Ass., 179, 940943.Google Scholar
Morrisby, J. R. (1956). Differential Test Battery. London: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Primac, D. W., Mirsky, A. F., and Rosveld, H. E. (1957). “Effect of centrally acting drugs on two tests of brain damage.” Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 77, 328331.Google Scholar
Sandler, G. (1955). “A test of the significance of the difference between the means of correlated measures based on a simplification of student's t.” Brit. J. Psychol., 46, 225226.Google Scholar
Schwartzberg, A. Z., and Van der Castle, R. W. (1961). “A controlled clinical study of chlordiazepoxide.” Amer. J. Psychiat., 117, 922923.Google Scholar
Simon, A. (1958). “Studies in Concept Formation.” Ph.D. Thesis. Cardiff: University of Wales.Google Scholar
Trouton, D., and Eysenck, H. J. (1961): “The effect of drugs on behaviour.” In: Handbook of Abnormal Psychology (Ed.: Eysenck, H. J.). London.Google Scholar
Vinacke, W. E. (1952). The Psychology of Thinking. New York.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive Thinking. New York.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.