Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:34:10.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Psychometric Characteristics of an Adult Glass in Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

D. F. Clark
D. F. Clark*
Affiliation:
Towers Hospital, Leicester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The avowed intention of a recent paper by Dann (1964) on psychological disturbance in students of psychology was to encourage others to collect and publish further data. It was suggested by that writer that “the general impression amongst doctors” was that students and ex-students of psychology suffer more from psychiatric disorders than do other members of the population. Taking a sample of students reading psychology at University College, Swansea and comparing it with students reading other subjects at the same College, Dann found a statistically significantly greater proportion of the former to exhibit psychiatric disorder, mostly of a neurotic or psychosomatic sort. The criterion of when a consultation became one for a psychiatric disorder was subjective and “was stretched fairly widely”, and there is no information about whether the consultant was or was not aware of what course the student was on before arriving at the diagnosis.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 111 , Issue 477 , August 1965 , pp. 745 - 753
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1965 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, F. (1952). Psychosomatic Medicine. London: Allen & Unwin, Ltd.Google Scholar
Blackburn, R. (1965). “Denial-admission tendencies and the M.P.I.” Brit. J. soc. clin. Psychol. In the press.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, W. G., and Welsh, G. S., (eds.) (1956). Basic Readings on the M.M.P.I. in Psychology and Medicine. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, W. G. (1960). An M.M.P.I. Handbook. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Dann, T. C. (1964). “The relative incidence of psychiatric disorder in students of psychology and other subjects.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 110, 186–190.Google Scholar
Davidson, M. A., Lee, D., Parnell, R. W., and Spencer, S. J. G. (1955). “The detection of psychological vulnerability in students.” J. ment. Sci., 101, 810–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. L. (1957). The Social Desirability Variable in Personality Assessment and Research. New York: Dryden.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. L. (1959). Revised Manual for the E.P.P.S. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1956). “The questionnaire measurement of neuroticism and extraversion.” Rio. di. Psicologia., 50, 113–140.Google Scholar
Fordyce, W. E. (1956). “Social desirability in the M.M.P.I.” J. consult. Psychol., 20, 171–175.Google Scholar
Hathaway, S. R., and McKinley, J. G. (1951). Manual of the M.M.P.I. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Heim, A. W. (1950). Manual for Group Test of Intelligence. AH4 . London: N.F.E.R.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1958). “The Maudsley Personality Inventory.” Acta psychol., 14, 314–325.Google Scholar
McGuire, R. J., Mowbray, R. M., and Vallance, R. C. (1963). “The Maudsley Personality Inventory used with psychiatric in-patients.” Brit. J. Psychol., 54, 2, 157–166.Google Scholar
Kassebaum, G. G., Couch, A. S., and Slater, P. E. (1959). “The factorial dimensions of the M.M.P.I.” J. consult. Psychol., 23, 226–236.Google Scholar
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in Personality. New York: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.