Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T00:32:55.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression with Medical In-Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

John J. Schwab ,
Martin R. Bialow ,
Roy S. Clemmons  and
Charles E. Holzer
John J. Schwab
Affiliation:
College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
Martin R. Bialow
Affiliation:
Maimonides Hospital, Brooklyn, New York
Roy S. Clemmons
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
Charles E. Holzer
Affiliation:
College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This report evaluates the use of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRS) (5) in a general medical in-patient population; it is one part of a comprehensive study of depression in these patients (10, 11). The Hamilton Rating Scale was designed to measure the severity of depression in patients already diagnosed as having depressive illness. Hamilton (5) states, “the scale quantifies the results of an interview and is of practical value in assessing the results of treatment.” Recently, the HRS has been used for measuring psychiatric patients' responses to antidepressant medications (7, 9, 12), but there are no reports of its use with medical patients.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 113 , Issue 494 , January 1967 , pp. 83 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1967 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., and Erbaugh, J. (1961). “An inventory for measuring depression.” Arch. gen. Psych., 4, 561–571.Google Scholar
2. Beck, A. T. Personal communication.Google Scholar
3. Brodman, K., Erdmann, A., Lorge, I., Gershenson, C., and Wolff, H. (1952). “The Cornell Medical Index—health questionnaire IV. The recognition of emotional disturbances in a general hospital.” J. clin. Psychol., 8, 289–293.Google Scholar
4. Gutheil, E. A. (1959). “Reactive depression.” In: American Handbook of Psychiatry (ed. Arieti, ). New York, p. 346.Google Scholar
5. Hamilton, M. (1960). “A rating scale for depression.” J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 23, 56–62.Google Scholar
6. Hamilton, M. Personal communication.Google Scholar
7. Le Gassicke, J., Boyd, W., and McPherson, F. (1964). “A controlled out-patient evaluation with fencamfamin.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 110, 267–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Redlich, F. C., and Freedman, D. X. (1966). The Theory and Practice of Psychiatry. New York, pp. 533–534.Google Scholar
9. Rose, J. T., Leaky, M. R., Martin, I. C. A., and Westhead, T. T. (1965). “A comparison of nortriptyline and amitriptyline in depression.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 111, 1101–1103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Schwab, J. J., Clemmons, R. S., Bialow, M. R., Duggan, V., and Davis, B. (1965). “A study of the somatic symptomatology of depression in medical in-patients.” Psychosomatics, 6, 273–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Schwab, J. J., Bialow, M. R., Clemmons, R. S., and Holzer, C. E. (1966). “The affective symptomatology of depression in medical in-patients.” Psychosomatics, 7, 214–217.Google Scholar
12. Waldron, J., and Bates, T. J. N. (1965). “The management of depression in hospital.” Brit. J. Psychiat, 111, 511–516.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.